Advertisement

New Experimental Approaches to the Inter-Animal Transfer of Acquired Information

  • G. F. Domagk
  • E. Schonne
  • G. Thines

Abstract

Experiments have been performed with chicks, mice and goldfish in order to find a procedure for the preparation of larger amounts of “trained brains”, which will allow a chemical transfer of information from donor animals into naive recipients.

Keywords

Brain Homogenate Taste Aversion Brain Extract Anthranilic Acid Conditioned Avoidance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Cherkin, A.: Failure to transfer memory by feeding trained brains to naive chicks. J. biol. Psychol. 12, 83–85 (1970).Google Scholar
  2. Garcia, J., and D. J. Kimelsdorf: Some factors which influence radiation-conditioned behavior of rats. Radiation Res. 12, 719–727 (1960b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kimelsdorf, D. J., J. Garcia, and D. O. Rubadeau: Radiation-induced conditioned avoidance behavior in rats, mice, and cats. Radiation Res. 12, 710–718 (1960a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Levan, H., D. L. Hebron, W. S. Moos, and H. C. Mason: Induction of post-irradiation conditioned avoidance behavior by intraperitoneal injection of brain. Experientia 26, 648–649 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Levan, H.: Transferabi1ity of radiation-induced behavior by injection of various organ extracts, paper presented at the 139th Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Chicago, Dec. 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Rosenthal, E., and S. B. Sparber: Transfer of a learned response by chick brain homogenate fed to naive chicks. Pharmacologist 10, 168 (1968).Google Scholar
  7. Sparber, S. B., and E. Rosenthal: An apparent transfer effect in chickens fed brain homogenates from donors trained in a detour task. In: Chemical Transfer of Learned Information (E. J. Fjerdingstad, ed.), pp. 165–180, North Holland Publ., Amsterdam (1971).Google Scholar
  8. Ungar, G., D. M. Desiderio, and W. Parr: Isolation, identification and synthesis of a specific-behavior-inducing brain peptide. Nature 238, 198–202 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wijffels, H. J. C.: Group learning versus individual learning as observed in fish learning a maze (Barbus conchonius and Carrassius auratus). Psychol. Belg. 9, 141–165 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. Zippel, H. P., and G. F. Domagk: Versuche zur chemischen Gedächtnisübertragung von farbdressierten Goldfischen auf undressierte Tiere. Experientia 25, 938–940 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zippel, H. P., and G. F. Domagk: Transfer of a taste preference from trained goldfish (Carassius auratus) into untrained recipients. Pflügers Arch. 323, 258–264 (1971a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zippel, H. P., and G. F. Domagk: Experiments concerning the transfer specificity of brain extracts in the taste discrimination of goldfish. Pflügers. Arch. 323, 265–272 (1971b).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. F. Domagk
    • 1
  • E. Schonne
    • 1
  • G. Thines
    • 1
  1. 1.Unité de BiochimieUniversité de LouvainBelgium

Personalised recommendations