Some Neurophysiological Considerations Concerning “Memory”

  • O. D. Creutzfeldt

Abstract

It is proposed that memory is an alteration of filter functions of cortical networks. Such alterations may take place at all levels of sensory (input) and motor (output) systems, and may also involve intrinsic systems such as the hypothalamic and limbic structures. As a simple model for such functional alterations of an analysing network, sensory after-effects are suggested. The McCOLLOUGH-effect is demonstrated and interpreted as temporary alteration of inhibitory connections between colour sensitive cells and orientation sensitive cells in a cortical column. Such an interpretation suggests that an alteration of inhibitory connections may play an essential role in “learning”. Local changes in minute neuronal circuitries such as certain cortical “columns” in an otherwise homogeneous neuronal structure may be sufficient to induce an alteration of the filter function of the whole cortical area. The hypothesis that specific memory substances may be responsible for deposition and recall of complex perceptual or behavioural patterns is not necessary for a neurophysiological memory model, and is actually incompatible with many neurophysiological observations.

Keywords

Visual Cortex Sensitive Cell Cortical Network Filter Function Inhibitory Connection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Benevento, L. A., O. D. Creutzfeldt, and U. Kuhnt: Significance of intracortical inhibition in the visual cortex. Nature New Biology 238, 124–126 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Creutzfeldt, O. D., U. Kuhnt, and L. Benevento: An intra-cellular analysis of excitation and inhibition in visual cortex neurones. In prep.Google Scholar
  3. Gouras, P.: Trichromatic mechanisms in single cortical neurons. Science 168, 489–492 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hubel, D. H., and T. N. Wiesel: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160, 106–154 (1962).Google Scholar
  5. Köhler, W., and H. Wallach: Figural aftereffects: an investigation of visual processes. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc. 88, 269–357 (1944).Google Scholar
  6. Mccollough, C.: Color adaptation of edge-detectors in the human visual system. Science 149, 1115–1116 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Murch, G. M., and J. Hirsch: The McCollough effect created by complementary afterimages. Am. J. Psychol. 85, 241–248 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Steiner, F. A.: Neurotransmitter und Neuromodulatoren. Technik und Resultate der Mikroelektrophorese im Nervensystem. Thieme, Stuttgart (Sammlung psychiatrischer und neurologischer Einzeldarstellungen) (1971).Google Scholar
  9. Tauc, L.: Polyphasic synaptic activity. Progr. in Brain Res. 31, 247–257 (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. D. Creutzfeldt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurobiologyMax-Planck-Institute of Biophysical Chemistry34 GöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations