Advertisement

Action of Various Drugs on the Formation and Fixation of Long Term Information in the Goldfish (Carassius Auratus)

  • H. P. Zippel
  • I. Gremmels
  • H. Abdel Ghaffar

Abstract

Pyrithioxine (40 mg/kg; 2 mg/kg) not only causes an increase in general activity, but also has a marked positive effect on the learning behavior of goldfish. Amphetamine (2 mg/kg) causes a similar enhancement of learning but has less pronounced effects on the overall activity. With Fencamphamine (2 mg/kg) there is no increase in activation, although some improvement in learning is manifested.

Keywords

Training Session General Activity Differentiation Training Carassius Auratus Color Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Bianchi, C., and E. Marazzi-Uberti: Acquisition and retention of a conditioned avoidance response in mice as influenced by pemoline, by some of its derivatives and by some CNS stimulants. Psychopharmacologia No. 1, 9–18 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Doty, B. A., and L. A. Doty: Facilitative effects of amphetamine on avoidance conditioning in relation to age and problem difficulty. Psychopharmacologia 9, 3, 234–241 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hotovy, R., H. J. Enenkel, J. Guussen, U. Jahn, H.-G. Kraft, H. Müller-Calgan, P. Mürmann, S. Sommer, and R. Struller: Zur Pharmakologie des Vitamin Bg und seiner Derivate. Arzneimittel-Forsch. (Drug-Res.) 14, 26–29 (1964).Google Scholar
  4. Hotovy, R., H. J. Enenkel, J. Gillissen, A. Hoffmann, U. Jahn, H.-G. Kraft, H. Müller-Calgan, and R. Struller: Pharmakologische Eigenschaften des 2-Äthylamino-3- pheny1-norcamphan. Arzneimittel-Forsch. 11, 20–24 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. Ilyuchenok, R. Y.: The action of drugs on memory and learning. Farmakol. Toksikol. (Novosibirsk, USSR) 33, No. 2, 237–246 (1970).Google Scholar
  6. Krivanek, J. A., and J. L. Mcgauch: Facilitating effects of pre- and posttrial amphetamine administration on discrimination learning in mice. Agents and Actions 1, 36–42 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kulkarni, A. S.: Facilitation of instrumental avoidance learning by amphetamine: an analysis. Psychopharmacologia 13, 418–125 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lal, H.: Control of learned conditioned-avoidance responses (CAR) by amphetamine and chlorpromazine. Psychopharmacologia 14, 33–37 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lal, H., and R. M. Brown: Interaction of amphetamine with social and other environmental stimuli in increasing inter-trial operant responding. Proc. Int. Union Physiol. Sci. XXIV Congress, Washington, Vol. V II (1968).Google Scholar
  10. Sommer, S., and R. Hotovy: Zur Differenzierung der zentral-erregenden Wirkung von 2-Äthylamino-3-phenyl-norcamphan. Arzneimittel-Forsch. 11, 969–972 (1961).Google Scholar
  11. Zippel, H. P., and G. F. Domagk: Spontaneous behavior and color differentiation in the goldfish (Carassius auratus) after a shock-free training procedure. J. biol. psychol. 12, 2, 3–7 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. Zippel, H. P., A. Burt, R. Schäfer, I. Gremmels and H. Abdel Ghaffar: Spontanverhalten und straffreie Dressur beim Goldfisch (Carassius auratus) bei verschiedenen Farbreizen, in prep.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. P. Zippel
    • 1
  • I. Gremmels
    • 1
  • H. Abdel Ghaffar
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiologisches Institut Lehrstuhl II der Universität34 GöttingenW-Germany

Personalised recommendations