Advertisement

Vision pp 55-79 | Cite as

Television Camera Tubes

  • Albert Rose
Part of the Optical Physics and Engineering book series (OPEG)

Abstract

At the outset, we recognize an obvious difference between the human visual process and the equivalent electronic camera tube. In the retina, all of the elements transmit their optical information simultaneously to the brain. In the camera tube, the elements are scanned serially at a rate sufficiently high that they appear to the eye to be simultaneous. The camera tube could, in principle, be designed to have all of its picture elements transmit their information simultaneously to the receiver. The resulting system would be cumbersome compared with the conventional scanning systems. There is, however, no fundamental difference in sensitivity to be expected between a simultaneous and a properly designed sequentially scanned system. The scanning process only imposes its own set of technical problems without fundamentally limiting the performance of the system.

Keywords

Quantum Efficiency Video Signal Electron Multiplier Scanning Beam Picture Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B-I.
    P.H. Boerse, “Electron Bombardment Induced Conductivity in Lead Monoxide,” in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 22A, pp. 305–314 (1966), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. B-2.
    W.S. Boyle and G.E. Smith, Charge-coupled semiconductor devices, Bell System Tech. J. 49, 587–593 (1970).Google Scholar
  3. C-1.
    J.E. Carnes and W.F. Kosonocky, Noise sources in charge-coupled devices, RCA Rev,33 327–343 (1972). [See also M.F. Tompsett, The quantitative effects of interface states on the performance of charge coupled devices, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-20 45–55 (1973).]Google Scholar
  4. C-2.
    M.H. Crowell, T.M. Buck, E.F. Labuda, J.V. Dalton, and E.J. Walsh, A camera tube with a silicon diode array target, Bell System Tech. J. 46, 491–495 (1967).Google Scholar
  5. F-1.
    P.T. Farnsworth, Television by electron-image scanning, J. Franklin Inst. 218, 411–444 (1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. F-2.
    S.V. Forque, R.R. Goodwich, and A.D. Cope, Properties of some photoconductors, principally antimony trisulphide, RCA Rev. 13, 335–349 (1951).Google Scholar
  7. G-1.
    G.W. Goetz and A.H. Boerio, Secondary electron conduction (SEC) for signal amplification and storage in camera tubes, Proc. IEEE 52, 1007–1012 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. H-1.
    L. Heijne, Photoconductive properties of lead-oxide layers, Philips Res. Repts. Suppl. 4, 1–161 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. I-1.
    H.A. Iams, G.A. Morton, and V.K. Zworykin, The image iconoscope, Proc. IRE 27, 541–547 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. M-1.
    G.A.Morton and J.E. Ruedy, “The Low-Light-Level Performance of the Intensifier Orthicon,” in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 12, pp. 183–193 (1960), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. M-1.
    L. Pensak, Conductivity induced by electron bombardment in thin insulating films, Phys. Rev. 75, 472–478 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. P-2.
    L. Pensak, Electron-bombardment-induced conductivity in selenium, Phys. Rev. 78, 171 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. R-I.
    R.L. Rogers, III, G.S. Briggs, W.N. Henry, P.W. Kaseman, R.E. Simon, and R.L. Van Asselt, Silicon-intensifier target camera tube, Int. Coni. on Solid-State Circuits,February 18–20, 1970, Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  14. R-2.
    A. Rose, Photoconductivity in insulators, RCA Rev. 13, 303–305 (1951).Google Scholar
  15. R-3.
    A. Rose and H.A. Lams, The orthicon, a television pickup tube, RCA Rev. 4, 186–199 (1939).Google Scholar
  16. R-4.
    A. Rose, P.K. Weimer, and H.B. Law, The image orthicon—A sensitive television pick-up tube, Proc. IRE 34, 424–432 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. S-1.
    F.L. J. Sangster and K. Teer, Bucket-brigade electronics—New possibilities for delay, time-axis conversion, and scanning, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits SC-4, 131–136 (1969).Google Scholar
  18. S-2.
    K. Shimizu and Y. Kiuchi, Characteristics of the new vidicon-type camera tube using CdSe as a target material, Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 6, 1089–1095 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. S-3.
    S-3. R.E. Simon, private communication (1966).Google Scholar
  20. W-1.
    P.K. Weimer, The image isocon—An experimental television pickup tube based on the scattering of low-velocity electrons, RCA Rev. 10, 366–386 (1949).Google Scholar
  21. W-2.
    P.K. Weimer, Photoconductivity in amorphous selenium, Phys. Rev. 79, 171 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. W-3.
    P.K. Weimer and A.D. Cope, Photoconductivity in amorphous selenium, RCA Rev. 12, 314–334 (1951).Google Scholar
  23. W-4.
    P.K. Weimer, S.V. Forque, and R.R. Goodrich, The vidicon—photoconductive camera tube, Electronics, May (1950).Google Scholar
  24. W-5.
    P.K. Weimer, W.S. Pike, G. Sadasiv, F.V. Shallcross, and L. Meray-Horvath, Multi-element self-scanned mosaic sensors, IEEE Spectrum 6, 52–65 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Z-1.
    V.K. Zworykin, The iconoscope, Proc. IRE. 22, 16–32 (1934).Google Scholar

General

  1. L.N. Biberman and S. Nudelman, Photoelectronic Imaging Devices, Vols. 1 and 2 (1971), Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. R. Clark Jones, “Quantum Efficiency of Detectors for Visible and Infrared Radiation,” in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 11, pp. 87–183 (1959), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. A. Rose, “Television Pickup Tubes and The Problem of Vision,” in Advances in Electronics, Vol. I, pp. 131–166 (1948), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. O. H. Schade, The resolving-power functions and quantum processes of television camera tubes, RCA Rev. 28, 460–535 (1967).Google Scholar
  5. H.V. Soule, Electrooptical Photography at Low Illumination Levels (1968), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  6. P.K. Weimer, “Television Camera Tubes: A Research Review,” in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 13, pp. 387–437 (1960), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. V.K. Zworykin and G.A. Morton, Television (1954), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Rose
    • 1
  1. 1.David Sarnoff Research CenterRCAPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations