Coherence and Quantum Optics pp 755-766 | Cite as

# Superradiance from a System of 3-Level Particles

Conference paper

## Abstract

Superradiance, first discussed in 1954 by Dicke [1], has recently re-emerged as one of the central interests in the field of atomic radiation, due in part to experimental developments in the area of short pulse coherent interactions [2],[3].

### Keywords

Coherence Mandel## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- 1.R.H. Dicke, Phys. Rev.
*93*, 99 (1954).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.I.D. Abella, N.A. Kurnit and S.R. Hartmann, Phys. Rev.
*141*, 391 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.S.L. McCall and E.L. Hahn, Phys. Rev.
*183*, 457 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.F.T. Arecchi and E. Courtens, Phys. Rev.
*A2*, 1730 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.F. Bloch, Phys. Rev.
*70*, 460 (1946).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6a.G. Racah, Ergeb. Exakt. Naturw.
*37*, 28 (1965).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - b.E.M. Loebl,
*Group Theory*(Academic Press, 1968 ).MATHGoogle Scholar - c.c. M. Hamermesh,
*Group Theory*(Addison-Wesley Co., 1962 ).MATHGoogle Scholar - d.H.J. Lipkin,
*Lie Groups*(North Holland Pub.Co., Amsterdam, 1966 ).MATHGoogle Scholar - e.R. Gilmore, J. of Math. Phys.
*11*, 513 and 3420 (1970).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.This approach has been suggested by F.T. Arecchi and D.M. Kim, who collaborated with one of us (R.G.) on preliminary investigations. See also L.A. Shelepin, Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz.
*54*, 1463 (1968) (Sov. Phys. JETP*27*, 784 (1968)).Google Scholar - 8.Y.C. Cho, Ph.D. Thesis, M.I.T. (1972) (unpublished).Google Scholar
- 9.We assume here that ω
_{1}, ω_{2}and ω_{3}are different from one another to the limits of the superradiant line breadth so that interference may be avoided.Google Scholar - 10.See p. 187 in Ref. 6(b).Google Scholar
- 11.The classification into irreducible representations is illustrated for four three-level particles in Fig. 4 of the paper by R. Gilmore in this volume, p. 217.Google Scholar
- 12.Eigenvalues of H
_{1}and H_{2}are called weights of the representation of SU(3). In this paper, each weight is subtracted by the lowest weight so that the collective ground state is redefined as zero energy level.Google Scholar - 13.R. Bonifacio, D.M. Kim and M.O. Scully, Phys. Rev.
*187*, 441 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.R. H. Dicke,
*Quantum Electronics III*(N. Bloembergen and P. Grivet, eds., 1964), vol.*1*, p. 35. See also Refs. 1, 15 and 16.Google Scholar - 15.N.E. Rehler and J.H. Eberly, Phys. Rev.
*A3*, 1735 (1971).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.R. Bonifacio and P. Schwendimann, Nuovo Cimento Letters
*3*, 509 (1970). See also R. Bonifacio, P. Schwendimann and F. Haake, Phys. Rev.*A4*, 302 and 854 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.See also R. Friedberg and S.R. Hartmann, Physics Letters
*37A*, 285 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.The permutational invariance of the interaction can be maintained even for low mirror reflectivity by assuming, for example, a traveling wave ring laser cavity with distributed losses.Google Scholar
- 19.See Appendix G in Ref. 2. As discussed here and in Ref. 15, this result pertains to a sample with a large Fresnel number.Google Scholar
- 20.Similar differential equations, but without the constant η which accounts for quantum fluctuations, have been derived by M.D. Crisp and E.T. Jaynes, Phys. Rev.
*179*, 1253 (1969), using a semiclassical treatment.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 21.The proceeding discussions can be extended to the case γ2≠0.Google Scholar
- 22.If (X
_{0}, Y_{0})∼ η, the quantum fluctuation would be so large during spontaneous decay that the semiclassical treatment would result in considerable error.Google Scholar - 23.It must be emphasized that the interference between the γ
_{1}transition and the γ_{2}transition should have been taken into account for λ_{1}= 2λ_{3}(ω_{1}=ω_{2}) if γ_{2}were not assumed to be zero.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973