Multiple Pulse Chirping in Self-Induced Transparency

  • Ljubomir Matulic
  • Joseph H. Eberly
Conference paper


The interest in phase modulation of short optical pulses has continually increased in the last few years[1]. In this note we will restrict ourselves to the first order theory of steady-state pulses. That is to say, we will work in the common “slowly varying” approximation according to which the envelope and the phase of the pulse vary very little within an optical cycle[la,c,d]. This approach leads to the prediction that the single optical pulses (solitons) propagating in linear absorbers must show no phase modulation[2]. It predicts also the possible existence of a variety of non-chirped as well as chirped pulse trains[3]. Here we will present a unified view of this problem.


Carrier Frequency Nonlinear Absorber Bloch Vector Resonant Medium Resonant Atom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.(a)
    S. L. McCall and E. L. Hahn, Phys. Rev. Letters 18, 908 (1967); Phys. Rev. 183, 457 (1969);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (b).
    Recent experimental work has been reported by H. M. Gibbs and R. E. Slusher, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 638 (1970); Appl. Phys. Letters 18, 505 (1971) and Phys. Rev. A5, 1634 (1972);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (c).
    A review of ultrashort pulse phenomena, and many other references, are given by G. L. Lamb, Jr., in Rev. Mod. Phys. 43, 99 (1971);MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (d).
    D. Dialetis, Phys. Rev. A2, 249 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    L. Matulic, Optics Comm. 2, 249 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 3.
    L. Matulic and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A69 822 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    R. A. Marth and J. H. Eberly (unpublished); R. A. Marth, Ph.D. thesis (Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, 1972)(unpublished); J. H. Eberly, this volume, p. 649.Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    J.H. Eberly and L. Matulic, Optics Comm. 13 241 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 6.
    L. Matulic, P. W. Milonni and J. H. Eberly, Optics. Comm. 4 181 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 7.(a)
    J. H. Eberly, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (unpublished);Google Scholar
  11. (b).
    S. R. Barone, Phys. Letters 32A, 8 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 8.(a)
    F. T. Arecchi, V. DeGiorgio and C. G. Someda, Phys. Letters 27A, 588 (1968);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (b).
    M. D. Crisp, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 820 (1969);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (c).
    J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 760 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 9.
    F. A. Hopf and M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. 179, 399 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. F. A. Hopf, G. L. Lamb, Jr., C. K. Rhodes and M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. A3, 758 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 10.
    Note that it is not as simple as just a matter of choice. If one prefers to talk about periodically negative envelopes and thereby avoid having to introduce explicit ± π phase jumps, then one is left without insight into the wide variety of cases in which the phase jumps are not equal to ± π. An interesting example of such a situation is shown in Fig. 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ljubomir Matulic
    • 1
  • Joseph H. Eberly
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.St. John Fisher CollegeRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations