Response Functions for Strongly Driven Systems

  • B. R. Mollow


The coupling of an atom to the quantized electromagnetic field, in the electric dipole approximation, may be described in terms of the correlation or “response” function
$$\left\langle {\mu \left( t \right)\mu \left( {t'} \right)} \right\rangle $$
where μ is the atomic electric dipole moment operator.


Stationary Part Resonant Transition Signal Field Pump Field High Pump Intensity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R.J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963); L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 231 (1965).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. 188, 1969 (1969); Phys. Rev. A2, 76 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. W. Ross, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 36, 458 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. R. Mollow and M. M. Miller, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 52, 464 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. A5, 1522 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. A5, 2217 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    See M. Lax, Phys. Rev. 172, 350 (1968) and related references.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Karplus and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 73, 1020 (1948).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The emission spectrum has been discussed for the case of strong collisional relaxation by M. Newstein, Phys. Rev. 167, 89 (1968), who finds results in agreement with ours in the limit of strong applied fields.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. R. Stroud, Jr., Phys. Rev. A3, 1044 (1971) has obtained spectra which roughly resemble the ones we have found in Ref. (2a) in the limit of strong applied fields, though differing even in that limit from our results in certain important respects.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    An interesting extension of the methods of Ref. 2 which allows for the possibility of “unimolecular decay” has been made by M. F. Goodman and E. Thiele, Phys. Rev. A5, 1355 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    For the case ν ≈ ω, slowly varying time-dependent components oscillating at the frequency 2(ν-ω) are present in the absorption spectrum in addition to the d. c. components found in Ref. 6, and in addition to the oscillating components in Eq. (22).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The nonstationary processes will be treated in greater detail by the author in a subsequent publication.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    See for example N. Bloembergen, Nonlinear Optics, (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., N. Y., 1965 ).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    An excellent review of this subject is given by G. W. Series in Quantum Optics, Proceedings of the Tenth Session of the Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics, 1969, edited by S.M. Kay and A. Maitland ( Academic Press, London and New York, 1970 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. R. Mollow
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of MassachusettsBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations