Some Polytypes of Germanium and a Tight Binding Model for the Electronic Structure of Amorphous Solids

  • Douglas Henderson
  • Irene B. Ortenburger
Conference paper
Part of the The IBM Research Symposia Series book series (IRSS)


There is now considerable evidence1–3 that a useful, although idealized, model of amorphous silicon and germanium is the random tetrahedral network (RTN). In this model, each atom is bonded to four nearest-neighbors at very nearly the nearest-neighbor distance R0, of the crystal. The tetrahedral bonding is very nearly preserved in the RTN with the rms deviation in angle being about 10°–15° and a maximum deviation in angle of about twice this amount Thus, on a local scale, the atomic arrangements in the RTN are much like those of the diamond lattice of crystalline Si and Ge. However, on a larger scale significant differences between the diamond lattice and the RTN become apparent. For example, the diamond lattice consists entirely of “staggered” arrangements of bonds on nearest-neighbors whereas the dihedral angle in the RTN is random. In addition, the RTN contains five-, six-, and seven-member rings whereas the diamond lattice contains only six-member rings.


Dihedral Angle Radial Distribution Function Amorphous Solid Tight Binding Model Diamond Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. E. Polk, J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 5, 365 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Henderson, Computational Solid State Physics, (Edited by F. Herman, N. W. Dalton, and T. R. Koehler) Plenum Publishing Co., New York, 1972, p. 175; D. Henderson and F. Herman, J. Non-Crystalline Solids 8-10, 359 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. J. Shevchik and W. Paul, J. Non-Crystalline Solids (in press).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Weaire and A. R. Williams, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 49, 619 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Weaire, this volume.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Phys. Rev. 94, 1498 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Weaire, Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 1541 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Herman, R. L. Kortum, C. D. Kuglin, and R. A. Short, in Quantum Theory of Atoms, Molecules, and the Solid State (Edited by P. O. Lowden) Academic Press Inc., New York, 1966, p. 381.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. D. Joannopoulos and M. L. Cohen, preprint.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. B. Ortenburger and D. Henderson, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Semiconductors (in press).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. M. Donovan and W. E. Spicer, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 1572 (1968); T. M. Donovan, W. E. Spicer, J. M. Bennett, and E. J. Ashley, Phys. Rev. B2, 397 (1970); T. M. Donovan, E. J. Ashley, and W. E. Spicer, Phys. Letters 32A, 85 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Henderson
    • 1
  • Irene B. Ortenburger
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Research LaboratorySan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations