Advertisement

Emission Characteristics of Continuous Combustion Systems of Vehicular Powerplants — Gas Turbine, Steam, Stirling

  • W. R. Wade
  • W. Cornelius

Abstract

The low emission potential of continuous combustion systems has generated considerable interest in their application to vehicular powerplants. While the prime consideration for a vehicular combustion system is low exhaust emissions, emphasis must also be placed on the usual considerations of performance, reliability, durability and simplicity.

The General Motors Research Laboratories has had experience with three different types of continuous combustion powerplants; namely, gas turbines, steam engines and Stirling engines. Combustors for the steam and Stirling engines were patterned after the can-type burner of the regenerative gas turbine. The sizes and configurations of the burners varied markedly because of the differences in the heat release rates and the thermodynamic cycles of the powerplants which accounted for the widely-different operating ranges of inlet pressure, inlet temperature and fuel-air ratio of the three burners.

Unburned hydrocarbon (HC), carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions were measured from typical combustion systems of the three powerplants. Using these measurements, steady-state emission characteristics of the combustion systems were compared on the bases of exhaust gas concentration (ppm), emission index (gm/kg of fuel burned) and specific emission (gm/bhp-hr). While the emission index is exclusively an indicator of burner performance, the specific emission parameter reflects overall powerplant performance.

These test data indicated the major problem associated with each burner to be high emissions of oxides of nitrogen. The NOX emission indices of the regenerative gas turbine and Stirling engine burners were comparable, reflecting the strong influence of high inlet temperature. The NOX emission index of the steam engine burner was considerably lower due to operation at ambient inlet air temperature, but was still higher than required to meet the 1976 Federal standards. Emissions of unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide from each burner were decidedly low, although operation of the steam engine burner at ambient inlet conditions necessitated considerable burner development to minimize these pollutant emissions. Exhaust smoke and aldehyde emissions of the burners have not constituted serious problems.

Emission control techniques were applied to each burner after reviewing the chemical kinetics of the pollutant species of concern. It was determined that two conflicting requirements must be satisfied for a low emission burner; namely, low temperature — short residence time for low NO emission and high temperature — long residence time for low HC and CO emissions.

The gas turbine type of burner was deemed to be more amenable to the control of NO emissions than the other two types of burners because of the availability of a large quantity of excess air that can be used for emission control and a reasonably-low outlet temperature that precludes continuing chemical reactions. Early quench and primary zone equivalence ratio modification have been effective means for reducing NO emissions from the conventional gas turbine burner. Theoretical studies reveal that other control techniques may be equally or more effective depending on the design and operating characteristics of the particular engine burner.

Vehicle mass emissions are influenced significantly not only by the design and operating conditions of the combustion system but also by the performance of the powerplant and the duty cycle of the vehicle. In seeking a vehicle that will meet the 1976 Federal mass emission requirements, it will be most advantageous to consider the combustion system and other major components of the powerplant as an integrated system. Since vehicle mass emissions (grams per mile) are dependent on the emission index of the burner as well as the fuel economy of the vehicle (miles per gallon of fuel burned), reductions in vehicle mass emissions can be obtained by either separate or preferably combined improvements in burner, engine and vehicle performances.

Keywords

Nitric Oxide Mass Emission Primary Zone Stirling Engine Emission Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. A. Turunen, “Pinwheels or Pistons?” SAE Trans., Vol. 63, pp. 72–83, 1955.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. A. Turunen and J. S. Collman, “The General Motors Research GT-309 Gas Turbine Engine”, SAE Trans., Vol. 74, Sec. 3, Paper No. 650714, pp. 357–377, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. T. Vickers, C. A. Amann, H. R. Mitchell, and W. Cornelius, “The Design Features of the GM SE-101 — A Vapor-Cycle Power plant”, SAE Trans., Vol. 79, Sec. 1, Paper No. 700163, pp. 628–650, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. T. Vickers, J. R. Mondt, W. H. Haverdink, and W. R. Wade, “General Motors’ Steam Powered Passenger Cars — Emissions, Fuel Economy and Performance”, SAE Trans., Vol. 79, Sec. 3, Paper No. 700670, pp. 2099–2126, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Flynn, W. H. Percival, and F. E. Heffner, “GMR Stirling Thermal Engine”, SAE Trans., Vol. 68, pp. 665–684, 1960.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. E. Heffner, “Highlights from 6500 Hours of Stirling Engine Operation”, SAE Trans., Vol. 74, Sec. 2, Paper No. 650254, pp. 33–54, 1966.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. D. Agarwal, R. J. Mooney, and R. R. Toepel, “Stir-Lee I, A Stirling Electric Hybrid Car”, SAE Paper No. 690074, January 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Cornelius and W. R. Wade, “The Formation and Control of Nitric Oxide in a Regenerative Gas Turbine Burner”, SAE Trans., Vol 79, Sec. 4, Paper No. 700708, pp. 2176–2202, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. H. Lienesch and W. R. Wade, “Stirling Engine Progress Report: Smoke, Odor, Noise and Exhaust Emissions”, SAE Trans., Vol. 77, Sec. 1, Paper No. 680081, pp. 292–307, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. H. Lefebvre and E. R. Norster, “The Design of Tubular Gas Turbine Combustion Chambers for Optimum Mixing Performance”, The Institution of Mechanical Engineers Proceedings 1968–1969, Volume 183, Part 3N.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. C. Graves and J. S. Grobman, “Theoretical Analysis of Total Pressure Loss and Airflow Distribution for Tubular Turbojet Combustors with Constant Annulus and Liner Cross Sectional Areas”, NACA Report 1373, September 1956.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. R. Hawthorne and W. T. Olson, “Design and Performance of Gas Turbine Power Plants”, Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. E. Smith, “Combustion in Advanced Gas Turbine Systems”, Proceedings of an International Propulsion Symposium held at the College of Aeronautics, Cranfield, Pergammon Press, April 1967.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    “Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Combustion”, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boston, Massachusetts, June 1955, London, October 1955.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. S. Clarke and S. R. Jackson, “General Considerations in the Design of Combustion Chambers for Aircraft and Industrial Gas Turbines”, SAE Paper 444A, January 1962.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. R. Turner and Donald Bogart, “Constant Pressure Combustion Charts Including Effects of Diluent Addition”, NACA Report 937, March 1948.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. L. Stivender, “Development of a Fuel-Based Mass Emission Measurement Procedure”, SAE Paper No. 710604, June 1971.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. Cornelius, D. L. Stivender, R. E. Sullivan, “A Combustion System for a Vehicular Regenerative Gas Turbine Featuring Low Air Pollutant Emissions”, SAE Trans., Vol. 76, Sec. 4, Paper No. 670936, pp. 3140–3159, 1968.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Federal Department of Health, Education and Welfare, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicle Engines”, Federal Register, Vol. 33, No. 108 (June 1968), Part II.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Environmental Protection Agency, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicle Engines”, Federal Register, Vol. 36, No. 128 (July 2, 1971), Part II.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    State of California Air Resources Board, “California Exhaust Emission Standards, Test and Approval Procedures for Diesel Engines in 1973 and Subsequent Model Year Vehicles Over 6001 Pounds Gross Vehicle Weight.”Adopted Nov. 18, 1970, Amended Feb. 17, 1971.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. G Hammond, Jr., and A. M. Mellor, “Analytical Calculations for the Performance and Pollutant Emissions of Gas Turbine Combustors”, AIAA Paper No. 71–711, June 1971.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. B. Heywood, “Gas Turbine Combustor Modeling for Calculating Nitric Oxide Emissions”, AIAA Paper No. 71–712, June 1971.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. T. Crowe, D. T. Pratt, B. R. Bowman, T. W. Sonnichsen, “Prediction of Nitric Oxide Formation in Turbojet Engines for PSR Analysis”, AIAA Paper No. 71–713, June 1971.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Edelman and C. Economos, “A Mathematical Model for Jet Engine Combustor Pollutant Emissions”, AIAA Paper 71–714, June 1971.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Roberts, L. D. Aceto, and R. H. Kollrack, “An Analytical Model for NO Formation in a Gas Turbine Combustion Chamber”, AIAA Paper 71–715, June 1971.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. B. Heywood, J. A. Fay and L. H. Linden, “Jet Aircraft Air Pollutant Production and Dispersion”, AIAA Paper No. 70–715, January 1970.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. F. Sawyer, D. P. Teixeira, and E. S. Starkman, “Air Pollution Characteristics of Gas Turbine Engines”, Journal of Engineering For Power, Trans. ASME, Series A, Vol 91, No. 4, Oct. 1969, pp. 290–296.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. S. Starkman, Y. Mizutani, R. F. Sawyer, and D. P. Teixeira, “The Role of Chemistry in Gas Turbine Emissions”, ASME Paper No. 70-GT-81, May 1970.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. Eyzat and J. C. Guibet, “A New Look at Nitrogen Oxides Formation in Internal Combustion Engines”, SAE Trans., Vol. 77, Sec. 1, Paper No. 680124, pp. 481–500, 1968.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Camac and R. M. Feinberg, “Formation of NO in Shock Heated Air”, Eleventh Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, 1967, pp. 137–145.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. P. Fenimore, M. B. Hilt, and R. H. Johnson, “Formation and Measurements of Nitrogen Oxides in Gas Turbines”, ASME Paper No. 70-WA/GT-3, December 1970.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zeldovich, Y. B., “The Oxidation of Nitrogen in Combustion Explosions”, ACTA Physi-cochimica U.S.S.R., Vol. 21, pp. 577–628, 1946.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. M. Singer, E. B. Cook, M. E. Harris, V. R. Rowe, J. Grumer, “Flame Characteristics Causing Air Pollution: Production of Oxides of Nitrogen and Carbon Monoxide”, Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations RI 6958, 1967.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R. S. Brokaw and D. A. Bittker, “Carbon Monoxide Oxidation Rates Computed for Automobile Exhaust Manifold Reactor Conditions”, NASA Technical Note D-7024, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, 1970.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    H. K. Newhall, “Control of Nitrogen Oxides by Exhaust Recirculation”, SAE Trans., Vol. 76, Sec. 3, Paper No. 670495, pp. 1820–1836, 1968.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    T. S. Bacon, “Production of Non-Corrosive Inert Gas by the Combustion of Fuel Gas”, Petroleum Engineer, Vol. 11, No. 13, p. 51–56, September 1940.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. W. Bell, N. Bayard de Volvo, and B. P. Breen, “Nitric Oxide Reduction by Controlled Combustion Processes”, Paper presented at Western States Section, Combustion Institute, Spring Meeting, Berkeley, April 1970.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    H. K. Newhall and S. M. Shahed, “Kinetics of Nitric Oxide Formation in High Pressure Flames”, Paper presented at the Thirteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, University of Utah, August 1970.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    G. N. Richter, H. C. Wiese, B. H. Sage, “Oxides of Nitrogen in Combustion, Premixed Flame,” Combustion and Flame, Vol. 6, pp. 1–8, March 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    R. W. Niedywiecki and R. E. Jones, “Combustion Stability of Single Swirl-Can Combustor Modules Using ASTM-A1 Liquid Fuel”, NASA TN D-5436, Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, October 1969.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    A. W. Hussmanand G. W. Maybach, “The Film Vaporization Combustor”, SAE Trans., Vol. 69, pp. 563–574, 1961.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    R. Kamo, P. W. Cooper, B. N. Glicksberg, and J. A. Fitzgerald, “Nonluminous Combustion of Heating Oil Through Recirculation”, 1964 American Petroleum Institute Research Conference on Distillate Fuel Combustion, Conference, Chicago, Illinois. Paper CD 64–8, June 1964.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    I. Reba, “Combustion of Residual Fuel with Massive Recirculation”, IITRI Report M 6120, August 1967.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    R. E. Schreter, L. G. Poe, and E. M. Kuska, “Industrial Burners Today and Tomorrow (State of the Art)”, ASME Paper 69-WA/FU-7, November 1969.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    D. W. Locklin, “Small Oil Burners — A Review of Some Recent Developments”, ASME Paper 69-WA/FU-5, November 1969.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. A. Quader, “Why Intake Charge Dilution Decreases Nitric Oxide Emission from Spark Ignition Engines,” SAE paper No. 710009, January 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    N. R. Dibelius, M. B. Hilt, R. H. Johnson, “Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides from Gas Turbines by Steam Injection”, ASME paper 71-GT-58, March 1971.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    C. A. Amann, W. R. Wade, M. K. Yu, “Some Factors Affecting Gas Turbine Passenger Car Emissions”, SAEpaper No. 720237, January 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    A. H. Lefebvre, Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    D. H. Barnhartand E. K. Diehl, “Control of Nitrogen Oxides in Boiler Flue Gases by Two Stage Combustion”, Air Pollution Control Assoc. J., V. 10, 1960, p. 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    E. D. Brown, “Gas Turbine Combustion Chamber with Variable Area Primary Air Inlet”, U. S. Patent No. 2, 655, 787, Oct. 20, 1953.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    C. Kind, “Automatic Air Regulating Device in Combustion Chambers of Gas Turbine Plants”, U.S. Patent No. 2, 837, 894, June 10, 1958.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    H. Niki, A. Warnick, and R. R. Lord, “An Ozone-NO Chemiluminescence Method for NO Analysis in Piston and Turbine Engines”, SAE Paper 710072, January 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. R. Wade
    • 1
  • W. Cornelius
    • 1
  1. 1.General Motors Research LaboratoriesWarrenUSA

Personalised recommendations