Measurement of Nitric Oxide Formation within a Multi-Fueled Turbine Combustor

  • C. W. LaPointe
  • W. L. Schultz

Abstract

Factors affecting the nitric oxide (NO) emission level of a regenerative turbine combustor are reviewed. Differences attributable to fuel type are discussed. Temperature and composition measurements obtained with a water-cooled choked sampling probe are presented for a turbine combustor operating on two different fuels: #2 diesel oil and methanol. Methods of averaging the discrete data are developed. Temperature is computed from measurement of the choked sample flow rate. Methanol displays lower NO emission because of decreased high temperature residence duration, lower flame temperature and diminished oxygen and nitrogen availability. It is found that the combustion and NO formation zones occupy a small portion of the regenerative combustor while the CO oxidation zone occupies roughly half of the combustor under investigation. Nitric oxide never reaches equilibrium values, whereas carbon monoxide exceeds equilibrium values throughout most of the combustor.

Keywords

Combustion Methane Convection Enthalpy Hexane 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ya. B. Zeldovich, P. Ya. Sadovnikov, and D.A. Frank-Kamenetskii, Oxidation of Nitrogen in Combustion, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences, USSR, Moscow, 1947. (Translated by M. Shelef, Scientific Research Staff, Ford Motor Company. Copies are available from the translator).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Blumberg and J.T. Kummer, “Prediction of NO Formation in Spark-Ignited Engines — An Analysis of Method of Control,” Combustion Sciency and Technology, 4, 1971, p. 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.R. Marshall, “Atomization of Spray Drying,” Chem. Eng. Prog. Series No. 2, Vol. 5, AIChE, New York, 1954.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delavan Mfg. Co., Des Moines, Iowa, private communication with R. Slezak.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Way, “Combustion in the Turbojet Engine”, Selected Combustion Problems II, AGARD, Butterworths, London, 1956.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.A. Ranger and J. A. Nicholls, “Aerodynamic Shattering of Liquid Drops,” AIAA Journal, 7, 2, Feb. 1969.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.S. Penner, Chemistry Problems in Jet Propulsion, Pergamon Press, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N.D. Ingebo, “Vaporization Rates and Heat Transfer Coefficients for Pure Liquid Drops,” NAC A TN 2368, July, 1951.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.G. Parikh, R.F. Sawyer, and A.L. London, “Pollutants from Methane Fueled Gas Turbine Combustion,” Univ. of California, College of Engineering Report No. TS-70–15, Berkeley, January, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Caretto, R.F. Sawyer, and E.S. Starkman, “Formation of Nitric Oxide in Combustion Processes,” College of Engineering Report No. TS-68–1 Univ. of California, Berkeley, March, 1968.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.M. Keuthe and J.D. Schetzer, Foundations of Aerodynamics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Niki, A. Warnick, and R.R. Lord, “An Ozone — NO Chemiluminescence Method for NO Analysis in Piston and Turbine Engines,”SAE Paper No. 710072.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.G. Piken and C.H. Rouf, “Chemical Composition of Automobile Exhaust and A/F Ratio,” Scientific Research Staff, Ford Motor Company, June, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. W. LaPointe
    • 1
  • W. L. Schultz
    • 1
  1. 1.Ford Motor CompanyDearbornUSA

Personalised recommendations