Interaction Energy and Configuration of Ledges on (001) Copper Surfaces

  • P. Wynblatt


A computer model of the surface, consisting of a crystal with (001) terraces and either one or two ledges, has been constructed. Interaction between the atoms of the model has been described by means of a Morse potential. Given this force law and a previously developed zero-force atomic relaxation technique, it has been possible to establish the configuration of an isolated ledge, the attendant displacement field as well as the increase in energy which results upon introduction of a ledge on an otherwise perfect surface.

Consideration of surfaces with two ledges has allowed computation of the interaction between all three types of ledge pairs, as a function of ledge spacing. The results obtained show that the interaction between the displacement fields of a pair of ledges is short range and repulsive in all cases.

Estimates of the anisotropy of surface energy, on the basis of the calculated interaction, are found to agree qualitatively with the trends observed experimentally at high temperatures. When the present results are combined with a suitable high-temperature model, they are found to provide a correction in the proper direction.


Interaction Energy Displacement Field Copper Surface Morse Potential Absolute Zero 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Robertson, W. M., and Shewmon, P. G., Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 224: 804 (1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cabrera, N., Surface Sci., 2, 320 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hirth, J. P.,in “Energetics in Metallurgical Phenomena”, W. M. Mueller (ed.), Vol II, p. 1, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mullins, W. W., ASM Seminar on “Metal Surfaces”, p. 17, ASM, Metals Park, 1962.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blakely, J. M., and Schwoebel, R. L., to be published in Surface Science.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burton, J. J., and Jura, G., J. Phys. Chem., 71, 1937 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonneton, F., and Drechsler, M., Surface Sci., 22, 426 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wynblatt, P., Surface Sci., 22, 125 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ehrlich, G., and Kirk, C. F., J. Chem. Phys., 48, 1465 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wynblatt, P., and Gjostein, N. A., Surface Sci., 12, 109 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Girifalco, L. A., and Weizer, V. G., Phys. Rev., 114, 687 (1959).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hondros, E. D., and McLean, M., “Structure et Proprietes des Surfaces Solides”, p. 219, Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gruber, E. E., and Mullins, W. W., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 28, 875 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 1.
    T. E. Engel and R. Gomer, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 5572 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 2.
    J. L. Domange and J. Oudar, Surface Sci., 11 1244 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Wynblatt
    • 1
  1. 1.Scientific Research StaffFord Motor CompanyDearbornUSA

Personalised recommendations