Stability of Polyvinyl Chloride Latices

  • A. A. Bibeau
  • E. Matijevic
Conference paper


Among the important contributions to polymer technology, the invention of the emulsion polymerization process has been recognized to be of outstanding value. The salient feature of this process is that the reaction exists, almost exclusively, in small particles, generally less than one micron in diameter, which are dispersed in water. This reaction results in rapid polymerization rates coupled with the attainment of usefully high molecular weights in the final product. Another characteristic property of the emulsion polymerization process is the utilization of surfactants, which serve a dual purpose. As has been shown by Harkins (1), the surfactant micelles serve as the loci of the polymerization, while simultaneously preventing the flocculation of the particles which have been produced. The degree to which the surfactant stabilizes a latex is a direct function of the surfactant’s chemical composition, its adsorptivity on the particle surface, its degree of ionization at the surface, and the kind and concentration of the salts present in the bulk solution. It is the objective of this work to establish latex colloidal stability as a function of surfactant concentration, and electrolyte environment, and to interpret the results with the use of current theories.


Methylene Blue Electric Double Layer DLVO Theory Critical Coagulation Concentration Rapid Coagulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Harkins, W. D., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 69, 1428 (1947).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lazor, J., J. Appl. Poly. Sci., 1, 11 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark, R. J., Applied Polymer Symposia, 8, 207 (1969).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark, R. J., private communication.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones, J. H., J. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 28, #2, 398 (1945).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mark, H., E. J. W. Verwey, (ed.) Advances in Colloid Science, Vol. III, Interscience, (1950), pg. 101.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henery, D. C., Proc. Soc. London, A-133, 106 (1931).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van der Hoff, J. W., H. J. van der Hul, presented at the symposium “Clean Surfaces”, Raleigh, N.C. (April 8–11, 1968).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lauzon, R., private communication.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schenkel, J. H., J. A. Kitchener, Trans. Faraday Soc., 56, 161 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Watillon, A., A. M. Joseph-Petit, Disc. Faraday Soc. 42, 143 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ottewill, R. H., J. N. Shaw, Disc. Faraday Soc., 42, 154 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Derjaquin, B., L. P. Landau, Acta Physico Chim., 14, 633 (1941).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Verwey, J. W., J. Th.G. Overbeck, Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids, Elsevier (1948).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamaker, H. C., Physica, 4, 1058 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adamson, A. W., Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, Interscience (1967), pg. 214.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Force, C. G., E. Matijevic, Colloid-Z.U.Z. Polymere, 224, 51 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Bibeau
    • 1
  • E. Matijevic
    • 2
  1. 1.Monsanto CompanyIndian OrchardUSA
  2. 2.Clarkson College of TechnologyPotsdamUSA

Personalised recommendations