Theories of Animal Spacing: the Role of Flight, Fight and Social Distance

  • Glen McBride


The field of animal spacing is a difficult one, with little agreement on the interpretation of field data, and no single theoretical framework which is universally accepted. There is no lack of theory, and the contribution of any speaker is influenced by his own views on the whole subject. Because of this, it seems desirable to give a brief outline of my own interpretation of spacing phenomena, incorporating the specific topics at the appropriate points.


Home Range Social Distance Dominance Hierarchy Flight Distance Alpha Male 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Allee, W.C.: Dominance and hierarchy in societies of vertebrates. In P.P. Grasse, ed., Structure et Physiologie des Societes Animales, Collegues Internationaux, 34. Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 1952.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castoro, P.L. and Guhl, A.M.: Pairing behavior of pigeons related to aggressiveness and territory. Wilson Bull., 70: 57–69, 1958.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, D.E.: The role of density in aggressive behavior of house mice. Anim. Behay., 6: 207–210, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Darling, F.F.. Social behavior and survival. Auk, 183–191, 1952.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hediger, H.: Wild Animals in Captivity. Butterworth, London, 1950.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The evolution of territorial behavior. In Washburn, S.L., ed., The Social Life of Early Man. Methuen, London, 1963.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leyhausen, P. Symp. The communal organization of solitary mammals. Zool. Soc. Lond., 14: 249–264, 1965.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McBride, G.: Anim.The teat order and communication in young pigs. Behay., 11: 53–56, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McBride, G.: A general theory of social organization and behaUniv. of Qld. Vet. Sci. Pap. 1: 75–110, 1964.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McBride, G.:Society evolution. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust., 1: 1–13, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    McBride, G.:Society evolution. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust., 1: 1–13, 1966.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McBride, G.:and Foenander, F.: Territorial behavior in the do- mestic hen. Nature, 194: 102, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McBride, G.:, James, J.W., and Shoffner, R.N.: Social forces de- termining spacing and head orientation in domestic hens. Nature, 197: 1272–1273, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Orians, G.H., and Wilson, M.F.: Interspecific territories in birds. Ecology, 45: 736–745, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schneírla, T.C.: Aspects of stimulation and organization in approach/withdrawal processes underlying vertebrate behavior development. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 1: 1–74, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shoemaker, H.H.: Social hierarchies in flocks of canary. Auk, 56: 381–405, 1939.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glen McBride

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations