Application of Thermodynamic and Kinetic Parameters of the V-O-Na System to the Sodium Corrosion of Vanadium-Base Alloys

  • D. L. Smith
  • T. F. Kassner


The compatibility problem with liquid sodium is the primary limitation for the use of vanadium-base alloys as a fuel cladding in a sodium-cooled fast-breeder reactor. While there is considerable disagreement in the reported corrosion behavior of candidate alloys,(1–4) the importance of nonmetallic impurities (O, N, H, and C) in sodium on the predominant corrosion processes is generally recognized. Much of the disagreement can be attributed to the inability to measure these impurities with the required degree of accuracy. The oxygen concentrations in sodium frequently encountered in experimental systems that are used in corrosion studies are too low to be measured accurately by present chemical methods (e.g., mercury amalgamation and vacuum distillation). Furthermore, oxygen concentrations determined from Na2O solubility data at cold-trap temperatures are often inaccurate because of 1) oxide depletion from the cold trap to a value below the equilibrium solubility, 2) insufficient rate of supply of oxygen to the main loop from a bypass cold trap, and 3) a nonequilibrium oxygen concentration in sodium with respect to Na2O saturation at the temperature of the cold trap.


Oxygen Concentration Distribution Coefficient Cold Trap Oxide Film Formation Oxygen Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Greenberg, S., Ruther, W. E., and Levin, H. A., Symposium on Alkali Metal Coolants, IAEA, Vienna (1966), pp. 63–84.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Ruther, W. E., USAEC Report ANL-7505 (1969).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Borgstedt, H. U. and Frees, G., Proceedings 4th International Congress of Metallic Corrosion, Amsterdam (1969).Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Whitlow, G. A., Hornak, R. J., Shrock, S. L., and Bishop, E. C., Proceedings TMS-AIME Symposium on Corrosion by Liquid Metals, Philadelphia, October 13–15, (1969).Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Kassner, T. F. and Smith, D. L., USAEC Report ANL-7335 (1967).Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Rutkauskas, V. J., USAEC Report LA-3524-MS (1966).Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Noden, J. D. and Bagley, K. A., UKAEA Report TN-80 (1958).Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Szkopiak, Z. C., UKAEA Report TRG-Report-1157 (C/X) (1965).Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Powers, R. M. and Doyle, M. V., Acta. Met. 2, 604–607 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Powers, R. M. and Doyle, M. V., Acta. Met. 4, 233–237 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Monroe, F. M. and Cost, J. R., TMS-AIME 245, 1079–1082 (1969).Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Kassner, T. E., Trans. Met. Soc. AIME 239, 1643–1651 (1967).Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Kassner, T. F., J. Electrochem. Soc. 114, No. 7, 689–694 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. L. Smith
    • 1
  • T. F. Kassner
    • 1
  1. 1.Metallurgy DivisionArgonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA

Personalised recommendations