Advertisement

The Context and Strategies for Tissue Culture of Date, African Oil and Coconut Palms

  • Abraham D. Krikorian

Abstract

The benefits that can accrue from the application of aseptic culture techniques to palms such as African oil palm, date palm, coconut palm, etc. are considerable. Here, the challenge is, as in other instances, in developing methods to such a degree that they reflect a high level of reliability. In addition to effective tissue and cell culture methods, this means that sooner or later, in vitro derived or manipulated materials must be grown to maturity under field conditions, evaluated agronomically or horticulturally and shown to be acceptable. From that point on, predominantly economic considerations will determine the implementation of production programs. Information from preliminary field trials is just beginning to emerge. It is unclear where the subject now stands and will remain so until more data accrue. An attempt is made to provide a brief overview of the range of available tissue culture techniques for palms and their potential for production. Special emphasis has been placed on culture strategies as they reflect cell biological principles. Suggestions are made for a rethinking of approaches towards achieving the required reliability.

Keywords

Tissue Culture Somatic Embryo Somatic Embryogenesis Plant Tissue Culture Date Palm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, A., Ninan, C.A. and Gopinath, P., 1965, Cytology of development of abnormal endosperm in Philippine-makapuno coconuts, Cmyologia, 18: 395–408.Google Scholar
  2. Addae-Kagyah, K.A., Osafo, D.M., Olympic), N.S. and Atubra, O.K., 1988, Effect of seed storage, heat pretreatment and its duration on germination and growth of nursery stock of the idolatrica palm, Elaeis guineensis var. idolatrica (Chevalier), Trop. Agric. (Trinidad), 65: 77–83.Google Scholar
  3. Ahee, J. et al., 1981, La multiplication vegetative in vitro du palmier a huile par embryogenese somatique, Oleagincux, 36: 113–118.Google Scholar
  4. Ammar, S., Benbadis, A. and Tripathi, B.K., 1987, Floral induction in date palm seedlings (Phoenix dactvlifera var. Deglet Hour) cultured in vitro, Can. J. Bot., 65: 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anonymous, 1914, The sex of date palm seedlings, Kew Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information, pp. 159–162.Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous, 1987, La culture in vitro du palmier a huile (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Bibliographic analytique, Oleagineux 42: 101–112.Google Scholar
  7. Apavatjrut, P. and Blake, J., 1977, Tissue culture of stem explants of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.), Oleagineux, 32: 267–271.Google Scholar
  8. Arias, M.O. and Huete, F., 1983, Propagacion vegetativa in vitro de pejibaye (Bacois gasipaes HBK), Turrialba, 38: 102–108.Google Scholar
  9. Assef, G.M., Assari, K. and Vincent, E.J., 1986, Occurrence of an anti-fungal principle in the root extract of a Bayoud-resistant date palm cultivar, Netlz. J. Plant Pathos., 92: 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Assy Bah, B., 1986, Culture in vitro d’embryons zygotiques de cocotiers, Oleagineux, 41: 321–328.Google Scholar
  11. Balaga, H.Y., 1975, Induction of branching in coconut, Kalikasan, Philip. J. Biol., 4: 135–140.Google Scholar
  12. Balaga, H.Y. and de Guzman, E.V., 1971, The growth and development of coconut Makapuno embryos in vitro. II. Increased root incidence and growth in response to media composition and to sequential culture from liquid to solid medium, Philip. Agric., 53: 551–565.Google Scholar
  13. Ball, E., 1941, The development of the shoot apex and of the primary thickening meristem in Phoenix canariensis Chaub., with comparisons to Washingtonia filifera Wats. and Trachvcarpus cxcelsa Wendl. Am. J. Bot., 28: 820–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bass, A. and Huges, W., 1984, Conditions for isolation and regeneration of viable protoplasts of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis), Plant Cell Rep., 3: 169–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baudouin, L., and Noiret, J.M., 1987, Importance of environmental factors in the choice of oil palm ortets, Oleagineux, 42: 268–269.Google Scholar
  16. Belarbi-Hall, R. and Mangenot, F., 1986, Bayoud disease of date palm: Ultrastructure of root infection through nematodes, Can. J. Bot., 64: 1703–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bernard, G., 1964, Palmier a huile: Selection en pepiniere, Oleagineux, 19: 243–246.Google Scholar
  18. Blake, J., 1983, Tissue culture propagation of coconut, date and oil palm. In: Tissue Culture of Trees ( J.H. Dodds, ed.), pp. 29–50, AVI Publishing, Westport.Google Scholar
  19. Bonga, J.M., 1987, Tree tissue culture applications, Adv. in Cell Cult., 5: 209–239.Google Scholar
  20. Bornman, Ch., 1987, Picea abies. In: Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry Vol. 3 (J.M. Bonga and D. J. Durzan, eds.) pp. 2–29, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  21. Bouguedoura, N., 1980, Morphologic et ontogenese des productions axillaires du palmier-dattier, Phoenix dactvlifera L., C. R. A. Sci. (Set. D), 291: 857–860.Google Scholar
  22. Bryant, J.A. and Francis, D. (eds.), 1985. The Cell Division Svcle in Plants, Society for Experimental Biology 26. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Chandra Sekhar, K.N. and DeMason, D., 1988, Quantitative ultrastructure and protein composition of date palm (Phoenix dacndifera) seeds: A comparative study of endosperm vs. embryo, Am. J. Bot., 75: 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Compton, M.E. and Preece, J.E., 1988, Response of tobacco callus to shoot tip exudation from five species, Hortic. Sci., 23: 208–210.Google Scholar
  25. Corley, R.H.V., 1976, Sex differentiation in oil palm: Effects of growth regulators, J. Exp. Bot., 27: 553–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Corley, R.H.V., Barrett, J.N. and Jones, L.H., 1977, Vegetative propagation of the oil palm via tissue culture. In: International Developments in Oil Palm ( DA. Earp and W. Newall, eds.), pp. 1–8, Proc. Malaysian Int. Agric. Oil Palm Conf., The Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  27. Corley, R.H.V., Lee, C.H., Law, J.H. and Wong, C.Y., 1986, Abnormal flower development in oil palm clones, Planter, 62: 233–240.Google Scholar
  28. Courtois, G., 1968, Arbres anormaux chez Elaeis bainecnsis, Oleagineux, 23: 641–644.Google Scholar
  29. Cronauer-Mitra, S.S. and Krikorian, A.D., 1988a, Adventitious shoot production from calloid cultures of banana, Plant Cell Rep., 6: 443–445.Google Scholar
  30. Cronauer-Mitra, S.S. and Krikorian, A.D., 1988b, Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in the seeded diploid banana Musa ornato Roxb., Plant Cell Rep., 7: 23–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davis, T.A., 1967, Foliation of coconut spadices and flowers, Oleagineux, 22: 19–23.Google Scholar
  32. Davis, T.A., 1969, Clonal propagation of the coconut, World Crops, 21: 253–255.Google Scholar
  33. Davis, T.A. and Basu, K., 1969, Two cases of bulbil-bearing Rorassus Jlabellifcr Linn., J. India, Rol. Soc., 48: 198–201.Google Scholar
  34. Davis, T.A., Sudasrip, H. and Azio, H., 1981, Bulbil-shoot production from clonally propagated coconuts, Principes, 25: 124–129.Google Scholar
  35. de Guzman, E.V., 1969, The growth and development of coconut Makapuno embryo in vitro, 1. Induction of rooting, Philip. Agaic., 53: 65–78.Google Scholar
  36. de Guzman, E.V. and Del Rosario, A.G., 1964, The growth and development of Cocos nucifera L. Makapuno embryo in vitro, Philip. Agric., 48: 82–94.Google Scholar
  37. de Guzman, E.V. and Del Rosario, A.G., 1974, The growth and development in soil of Makapuno seedlings cultures in vino, National Research Council of the Philippines, Res. Bull., 29: 116.Google Scholar
  38. dc Guzman, E.V. and Manuel, G.C., 1977, Improved root growth in embryo and seedling cultures of coconut Makapuno by the incorporation of charcoal in the growth medium, Philip. J. Coconut Studies, 2: 35–39.Google Scholar
  39. de Guzman, E.V., Del Rosario, A.G. and Eusebio, E.C., 1971, The growth and development of coconut Makapuno embryo in vitro 3. Resumption of root growth in high sugar media, Philip. Agric., 53: 566–579.Google Scholar
  40. de Guzman, E.V., Rafols, A.G. and Del Rosario, A.G., 1983, Preliminary observations on floral biology and fruiting of in vino coconut palms. In: Coconut Research and Development ( N.M. Nayar, ed.), pp. 316–321, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Coconut Research and Development, Wiley Eastern, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  41. Del Rosario, A.G. and de Guzman, E.V., 1978, The growth of coconut Makapuno embryos in vitro as affected by mineral composition and sugar levels of the medium during the liquid and solid cultures, Philip. J. Sci., 105: 215–222.Google Scholar
  42. DeMason, D.A., 1985, Histochemical and ultrastructural changes in the haustorium of date (Phoenix dactvlifera L.), Protoplasma, 126: 168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. DeMason, D.A. and Thomson, W.W., 1981, Structure and ultrastructure of the cotyledon of date palm (Phoenix dactslifera L.), Bot. Ga., 142: 320–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. DeMason, D.A. and Tisserat, B., 1980, The occurrence and structure of apparently bisexual flowers in the date palm, Phoenix dactvlifera L. (Arecaceae), Bor. J. Linnean Soc. 81: 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. DeMason, D.A., Stolte, K.W. and Tisserat, B., 1982, Floral development in Phoenix dacttlifera, Can. J. Bot., 60: 1437–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. DeMason, D.A., Sexton, R., Gorman, M. and Reid,.I.S.G., 1985, Structure and biochemistry of endosperm breakdown in date palm (Phoenix dacnlaira L.) seeds, Protoplasma, 126: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dhawan, V. and Bhojwani, S.S., 1985, In vino vegetative propagation of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit, Plant Cell Rep., 4: 315–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Djerbi, M., 1982, Bayoud disease in North Africa: History, distribution, diagnosis and control. Baghdad, Iraq: (FAO Regional Project for Palm and Dates Research Centre in the Near East and North Africa). Date Palm J., 1: 153–198.Google Scholar
  49. Dowson, V.H.W., 1976, Bibliography of The Date Palm (H. Field and W.T. Gillis, eds.), Field Research Projects, Coconut Grove, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  50. Drira, N. and Benbadis, A., 1985, Multiplication vegetative du palmier dattier (Phoenixdactvlifera L.) par reversion, en culture in vitro, de’ehauches Ilorales de pieds femelles, J. Plant Physiol., 119: 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. D’Souza, L., 1980, Hypocotyl budding in cultured coconut embryos. In: Proceedings of a National Symposium on Plant Tissue Culture, Genetic Manipulation and Somatic hybridization of Plant Cells ( P.S. Rao, M.R. Heble and M.S. Chadha, eds.), pp. 190–294, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Bombay.Google Scholar
  52. D’Souza, L., 1982, Organogenesis in coconut embryo callus. In: Plant Tissue Culture 1982 ( A. Fujiwara, ed.), pp. 179–180, Jpn. Assoc. Plant Tissue Cult., Tokyo.Google Scholar
  53. Eeuwens, C.J. and Blake, J., 1978, Culture of coconut and date palm tissue with a view to vegetative propagation, Acta Hortic., 78: 277–286.Google Scholar
  54. Elmer, H.S., Carpenter, J.B. and Klotz, L.J., 1968, Pests and diseases of the date palm, FAO Plant Protection Bull., 16: 1–32.Google Scholar
  55. Fisher, J. and Tsai, J.H., 1979, A branched coconut seedling in tissue culture, Principes, 23: 128–131.Google Scholar
  56. Fitter, M.S. and Krikorian, A.D., 1982, Plant protoplasts: Some guidelines for their preparation and manipulation in culture, CalBiochem Behring, Division of American Hoechst Corporation, La Jolla.Google Scholar
  57. Fitter, M.S. and Krikorian, A.D., 1988, Variation among plants regenerated from protoplasts of diploid day lily. In: Progress and Prospects in Forest and Crop Biotechnology (F.A. Valentine, ed.), pp. 242–256, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Fridborg, G. and Eriksson, T., 1975, Effects of activated charcoal un growth and morphogenesis in cell cultures, Phvsiol. Plant., 34: 306–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Fridborg, G., Pederson, P., Landstrom, L.E. and Eriksson, T., 1978, The effect of activated charcoal on tissue culture; adsorption of metabolite inhibiting morphogenesis, Physiol. Plant., 43: 104–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Furtado, C.X., 1926–29, Abnormalities in coconut palms, Gardens’ Bulletin Straits Settlements, Singapore (Ser. 3, 4 ): 78–84.Google Scholar
  61. Gabr, M.F. and Tisseras, B., 1985, Propagating palms in vitro with special emphasis on the date palm (Phoeniv dactylifera L.), Sci. Horde., 25: 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Gatin, C.L., 1906, Recherches sur la germination des palmiers, Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique. (Ser. 9, 3 ): 191–314.Google Scholar
  63. Gautheret, R.J., 1942, Hetero-auxines et cultures de tissue vegetaux, Bull. de la Soc. dc ChimieBiol., 24: 13–46.Google Scholar
  64. Gautheret, R.J., 1959, La culture des tissus vegetaux, Masson et Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
  65. Gray, J.W. and Darrynkiewicz, Z., (eds.), 1987, Techniques in Cell Svcic Analysis, Humana Press, Clifton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  66. Grout, B.W.W., Shelton, K. and Pritchard, H.W., 1983, Orthodox behaviour of oil palm seed and cryopreservation of the excised embryo for genetic conservation, Ann. Bot. (Lond), 52: 381–384.Google Scholar
  67. Guerin, H.P., 1949, Contribution of l’elude du fruit et de la graine des palmiers, Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique, (Ser. 2, 10 ): 21–69.Google Scholar
  68. Gupta, P.K., Kendurkar, S.V., Kulkarni, V.M., Shirgurkar, M.V. and Mascarenhas, A.F., 1984, Somatic embryogenesis and plants from zygotic embryos of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) in vitro, Plant Cell Rep., 3: 222–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Haccius, B. and Philip, V.J., 1979, Embryo development in Cocos nucifera L.: A critical contribution to a general understanding of palm embryogenesis, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 132: 91–106.Google Scholar
  70. Haibou, T.K. and Kovoor, A., 1981, Regeneration of callus from coconut protoplasts. In: Tissue Culture of Economically Important Plants ( A.N. Rao, ed.), pp. 149–151, COSTED and ANBS Natn. Univ. Singapore.Google Scholar
  71. Hanower, J. and Hanower, P., 1984, Inhibition et stimulaiton, en culture in vitro, de l’embryogencse des souches issues de’explants foliaires dc Palmier a Huile, C. R. A. Sci., Ser. D, 298: 45–48.Google Scholar
  72. Hardon, J.J., Rao, V. and Rajanaidu, W., 1985, A review of oil-palm breeding. In: Progress in Plant Breeding ( G.E. Russell, ed.), pp. 139–163, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  73. Harries, H.C., 1977, Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). In: Plant Health and Quarantine in Imernational Transfer of Genetic Resources ( W.B. Hewitt and L. Chiarappa, eds.), pp. 125–136. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  74. Hartley, C.W.S., 1977, The oil palm, 2nd ed., Longman, London.Google Scholar
  75. Haseloff, J., Mohamed, N.A. and Symons, R.H., 1982, Viroid RNAs of cadang-cadang disease of coconuts, Nature (Load.), 299: 316–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Henry, P., 1955, Sur le development des feuilles chez la palmier a huile, Rev. Gen. Bot., 62: 231–237.Google Scholar
  77. Henry, P., 1957, Recherches sur la croissance et le développement chez Elacisguincensis.lacy. et chez Cocos nucifera L. comparaison avec d’autres palmiers, Universite dc Paris.Google Scholar
  78. Henry, P., 1961, Recherches cytologiques sur l’appareil floral et la graine chez Elacisguineensis et Cocos nucifera. II, Les fleurs et la graine, Rev. Gen. Bot., 68: 164–198.Google Scholar
  79. Hilgeman, R.H., 1951, The differentiation, growth and anatomy of the axis, leaf, axillary bud, inflorescence and offshoot in Phoenix dacn’lifera L., Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  80. Hilgeman, R.H., 1954, The differentiation, development and anatomy of the axillary bud, inflorescence and offshoot in the date palm, pp. 6–10. In: 31st Ann. Rep. Date Growes’Institute, Indio, California.Google Scholar
  81. Hodel, D., 1977, Notes on embryo culture of palms, Principes, 21: 103–108.Google Scholar
  82. Hunault, G., 1979, Rescherches sur le comportement des fragments d’organes et des tissus de monocotyledones cultivees in vitro, Rev. Crtoi., Biol. Vegetale Bot., 2: 259–287.Google Scholar
  83. Hussain, A.A., 1974, Date Palms and Dates and their Pests, Baghdad.Google Scholar
  84. Ibrahim, R.K., 1987, Regulation of synthesis of phenolics. In: Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Cell Culture and Phvtochemisry, Vol. 4 ( I.K. Vasil, ed.), pp. 77–95, Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  85. Imam, M.M., 1982, Mitosis in Elam guineensis Jacq. race Deli Dura, Palme Oil Res. Insu. of Malaysia (PORLhi) Bull., 5: 18–27.Google Scholar
  86. Iyer, R.D., 1981, Embryo and tissue culture for crop improvement, especially of perennials, germplasm conservation and exchange. In: Tissue Culture of Economically Important Plants ( A.N. Rao, ed.), pp. 229–230, COSTED and ANBS, Natn. Univ. Singapore.Google Scholar
  87. Johansson, L., 1983, Effects of activated charcoal in anther culture, Phvsiol. Plant., 59: 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Johnson, D., 1983, A bibliography of graduate theses on palms, Principes, 27: 85–88.Google Scholar
  89. Jones, L.H., 1974a, Plant cell culture and biochemistry: Studies for improved vegetable oil production. In: Industrial Aspects ofBiochemistrs, Vol. 30 (II) ( Jones, L.H., ed.), pp. 813–833, North Holland/American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  90. Jones, L.H., 1974b, Propagation of clonal oil palms by tissue culture, Oil Palm News, 17: 1–8.Google Scholar
  91. Jones, L.H., 1980, Clonal oil palm propagation by tissue culture, Unilever Research, Colworth Laboratory, Sharnbrook.Google Scholar
  92. Jones, L.H., 1984, Novel palm oils from cloned palms, J. An,. Oil Chem. Soc., 61: 648.Google Scholar
  93. Jones, L.H., Barfield, D., Barrett, J., Flook, A., Pollock, R. and Robinson, P., 1982, Cytology of oil palma cultures and regenerant plants. In: Plant Tissue Culture 1982 (A. Fujiwara, cd.), pp. 727–728, The Jpn. Assoc. Plant Tissue Cult., Tokyo.Google Scholar
  94. Kohlenbach, H.W. and Wernicke, W., 1977, Investigation of the inhibitory effect of agar and the function of activated carbon in anther culture, Physiol. Plant., 86: 463–472.Google Scholar
  95. Kovoor, A., 1981, Palm Tissue Culture: State of the Art and its Application to the Coconut, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  96. Krikorian, A.D., 1982, Cloning higher plants from aseptically cultured tissues and cells, Biol. Rey., 57: 151–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Krikorian, A.D., 1982, Cloning higher plants from aseptically cultured tissues and cells, Biol. Rey., 57: 151–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Krikorian, A.D. and Kann, R.P., 1986, Oil palm improvement via tissue culture, Plant Breed. Rev., 4: 175–202.Google Scholar
  99. WKrikorian, A.D., Kelly, K. and Smith, D.C., 1987, Hormones in tissue culture and micropropagation. In: Plant Hormones and their Role in Plant Growth and Development ( P.J. Davies, ed.), pp. 593–613, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Krikorian, A.D., O’Connor, S.A. and Fitter, M.S., 1983, Chromosomal stability in cultured plant cells and tissues. In: Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Techniques for propagation and breeding Vol. 1 ( W.R. Sharp, D.A. Evans, P.V. Ammirato and Y. Yamada, eds.), pp. 541–581, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
  101. Krikorian, A.D., Kann, R.P., O’Connor, S.A. and Fitter, M.S. 1986, Totipotent suspension as a means of multiplication. In: Tissue Culture as a Plant Production System for Horticultural Crops, ( R. Zimmerman et al., eds.), pp. 61–72, Martinus Nijhoff/Dr.W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  102. Kumar, P.P., Raju, C.R., Chandramohan, M. and Iyer, R.D., 1985, Induction and maintenance of friable callus from the cellular endosperm of Cocos nucifera L., Plant Sci., 40: 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Lawrence, J.B., Villnave, C.A. and Singer, R.H., 1988, Sensitive, high-resolution chromatin and chromosome mapping in situ: Presence and orientation of two closely integrated copies of EBV in a lymphoma line, Cell, 52: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Le Saint, J.P. and de Nuce de Lamothe, M., 1987, Dwarf coconut hybrids: Performance and value, Oléagineux, 42: 360–362.Google Scholar
  105. Lioret, C. and Ollagnier, M., 1981, La culture in vino de tissus chez le palmier a huile, Oléagineux, 36: 111–112.Google Scholar
  106. Llyod, F.E., 1910, Development and nutrition of the embryo, seed and carpel in the date, Phoenix dactylifera L. Missouri Bot. Garden Rep, 21: 103–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Loomis, W.D., 1974, Overcoming problems of phenolics and quinones in the isolation of plant enzymes and organelles, Methods in Enzymology, 31A: 528–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Malaurie, B., 1987, L’embryogenese somatique en milieu liquide du palmier a huile: Elaeis guineensis Jacq. et E. guineensis x E. melanococca, premier resultats, Oleagineux, 42: 217–222.Google Scholar
  109. Maramorosch, K., 1988, Non-chemical control of plant mycoplasma diseases. In: Mvcoplasma Diseases in Crops (K. Maramorosch and S.P. Raychaudhuri), pp. 431–449, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Maramorosch, K. and Hunt, P., 1981, Lethal yellowing disease of coconut and other palms. In: Mvcoplasna Disease of Coconut and other Palms ( K. Maramorosch and S.P. Raychaudhuri, eds.), pp. 185–210, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  111. Martin, J.P. and Rabechault, H., 1978, Demande de brevet d’invention No. 7628361 Procede de multiplication vegetative et plantes ainsi obtenus, (See also Patent Specification 1584854, The Patent Office, London Feb. 18, 1981 ).Google Scholar
  112. Mason, S.C., 1925, The minimum temperature for growth of the date palm and the absence of a resting period, J. Agri. Res., 31: 415–453.Google Scholar
  113. McClintock, B., 1978, Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome, Stadler Genetics Sytnposium, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, 10: 25–47.Google Scholar
  114. Meunier, J., 1975, Le Palmier a huile americain Elaeis ntelanococca, Oleagineux, 30: 51–62.Google Scholar
  115. Meunier, J., Vallejo, G. and Boutin, D., 1976 L’hybride E. melanococca x E. guineensis et son amelioration, Oleagineux, 31: 519–528.Google Scholar
  116. Mohammed, S., 1985, Effects of gibberellin on fruit of date palm: A review, Principes, 29: 23–30.Google Scholar
  117. Murashige, T. and Skoog, F., 1962, A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures, Phvsiol. Plant., 15: 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Nevers, P., Shepherd, N.S. and Saedler, H., 1986, Plant transposable elements, Adv. Bot. Res., 12: 103–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Ninan, C.A. and Raveendranath, T.G., 1965, A naturally occurring haploid embryo in the coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L.), Canologia, 18: 619–623.Google Scholar
  120. Nixon, R.W., 1966, Growing dates in the United States, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 207, ARS, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  121. Nwankwo, B.A., 1981, Facilitated germination of Elaeis guineensis var. pisifera seeds, Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 48: 251–254.Google Scholar
  122. Nwankwo, B.A. and Krikorian, A.D., 1982, Water as a storage medium for Elaeis guineensis var. pisifera seeds under aseptic conditions, Ann. Bot. (Land.), 50: 793–798.Google Scholar
  123. Nwankwo, B.A. and Krikorian A.D., 1983a, Aseptic storage of Elaeis guineensis var. pisifera seeds, Principes, 27: 34–37.Google Scholar
  124. Nwankwo, B.A. and Krikorian, A.D., 1983b, Morphogenctic potential of embryo and seedling derived callus of Elaeis guineensis Jacq. var. pisifera Becc., Ann. Bot. (Load.), 51: 65–76.Google Scholar
  125. Obendorf, R.L. and Wettlaufer, S.H., 1984, Precocious germination during in vitro growth of soybean seeds, Plant Phvsiol., 76: 1023–1028.Google Scholar
  126. Oppenheimer, Ch. and Reuveni, O., 1972, Development ofa method for quick propagation of new and superior date varieties, Agricultural Research Organization, The Vulcani Center, Final Report of Research Conducted under grants authorized by U.S. Public Law 480, Bet Dagan, Israel, pp. 92.Google Scholar
  127. Padmanabham, D., 1976, Rare axillary shoots in Phoenix, Principes, 20: 91–97.Google Scholar
  128. Pannetier, C. and Buffard-Morel, J., 1982, Production of somatic embryos from leaf tissues of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.). In: Plant Tissue Culture 1982 ( A. Fujiwara, ed.), pp. 755–756, The Jpn. Assoc. Plant Tissue Cult., Tokyo.Google Scholar
  129. Pannetier, C. and Buffard-Morel, J., 1985, Coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L.). Lt: Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestr, Vol. I, Trees 1 (Y.P.S. Bajaj, ed.), pp. 430–450, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  130. Paranjothy, K., 1982, A review of tissue culture of oil palm and other palms, Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, ( PORIM) Occasional Paper, No. 3.Google Scholar
  131. Paranjothy, K., 1984, Oil palm. In: Handbook of Plana Cell Culture, Vol. 3 ( P.V. Ammirato, D.A. Evans, W.R. Sharp and Y. Yamada, eds.), pp. 591–605, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
  132. Paranjothy, K., 1987, Recent developments in cell and tissue culture of oil palm. In: Proceedings of a Symposium on Agricultural Applications of Biotechnolog ( A.N. Rao and H.Y. Mohan Ram, eds.), pp. 83–95, COSTED and ANBS, Natn. Univ. Singapore.Google Scholar
  133. Pesce, C., 1985, Oil Palms and other Oilseeds of the Amazon, Translated and edited from the original 1941 Portuguese, (D.V. Johnson, ed.), Reference Publications, Algonac, Michigan. Popenoe, P., 1973, The Date Palm (H. Field, ed.), Field Research Projects, Coconut Grove, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
  134. Poulain, C., Rhiss, A. and Beauchesne, G., 1979, Multiplication vegetative en culture in vitro du palmier-dattier (Phoenirdactplifera L.), Academic d’Agriculture de France, C. R. Seances, 65: 1151–1154.Google Scholar
  135. Purvis, C., 1956, The root system of the oil palm: Its distribution, morphology and anatomy, West African Inst. Oil Palm Res. J., 1: 60–82.Google Scholar
  136. Rabechault, H., 1962, Recherches sur la culture in vitro des embryos de palmier a huile (Elaeis guineensisJacq.), 1. Effets de l’acide indolyl-acetique, Oleaginous, 17: 757–764.Google Scholar
  137. Rabechault, H. and Martin, J.P., 1976, Multiplication vegetative du Palmier a huile (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) a l’aide de cultures de tissus foliaires, C. R. Acad. Sci. (Ser. D), 283: 1735–1737.Google Scholar
  138. Rabechault, H., Ahee, J. and Guenin, G., 1970, Colonies cellulaires et formes embryoides obtenues in vitro a partir de cultures de’embryons de palmier a huile (E. guineensis Jacq. var. dura Becc.), C. R. Acad. Sci., (Ser. D), 270: 3067–3070.Google Scholar
  139. Rabechault, H., Martin, J.P. and Cas, S., 1972, Recherches sur la culture des tissus dc palmier a huile (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.), Oleagincux, 27: 531–534.Google Scholar
  140. Rajanaidu, 1980, Variation in the natural population of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) from Nigeria, Doctoral Thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  141. Raman, K., Walden, D.B. and Greyson, R.I., 1980, Propagation of Zea mays L. by shoot tip culture: A feasibility study, Ann. Bot. (Land.), 45: 183–189.Google Scholar
  142. Raveendranath, T.G. and Ninan, C.A., 1974, A study of somatic chromosome complements of tall and dwarf coconuts (Cocos nucifera L.) and its bearing on intervarietal variation and evolution in coconuts, J. Plant. Crops, 1: 17–22.Google Scholar
  143. Rees, A.R., 1962, High temperature pre-treatment and the germination of seeds of the oil palm, (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.), Ann. Bot. (Load.), 26: 569–581.Google Scholar
  144. Rcuveni, O., Adato, Y. and Lilien-Kipnis, H., 1972, A study of new and rapid methods for the vegetative propagation of date palms, pp. 17–24, In: 49th Ann. Rep. Date Growers’ Institute, Indio, California.Google Scholar
  145. Reynolds, J.F., 1982, Vegetative propagation of palm trees, In: Tissue Culture in Forestry ( J.M. Bonga and D.J. Durian, eds.), pp. 102–107, Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  146. Reynolds, J.F. and Murashige, T., 1979, Asexual embryogenesis in callus cultures of palms, In Vitro, 15: 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Rhiss, M.A., 1980, Palmier dattier, Multiplication vegetative en culture in vino, Doctoral Thesis, pp. 160, Universite de Paris-Sud Centre D’Orsay.Google Scholar
  148. Ruer, P., 1968, Contribution a l’etude du systeme racinaire du palmier a huile, Universite de Paris.Google Scholar
  149. Saaidi, M., Toutain, G., Bannerot, H. and Louvet, J., 1981, La selection du palmier-dattier (Phoenix dacrylifera L.) pour la resistance au bayoud, Fruits de’outre Mer (Paris), 36: 241–249.Google Scholar
  150. Sajise, J.U. and de Guzman, E.V., 1972, Formation of adventitious roots in coconut moka puno seedlings grown in medium supplemented with naphthaleneacetic acid, Kalikasan, Philip. J. Biol., 1: 197–206.Google Scholar
  151. Sarkar, S.K., 1957, Sex chromosomes in palms, Genetica Iberica, 9: 133–142.Google Scholar
  152. Sato, D., 1946, Karyotype alteration and phylogeny, VI. Karyotype analysis in Pahnae, Cetologia, 14: 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Schlichting, C.D., 1986., The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants, Ann. Rev. Ecology Systematics, 17: 667–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Schroeder, C.A., 1970, Tissue culture of date shoots and seedlings pp. 25–27, Date Growers’ Institute (Indio, California), In: 47th Ann. Rep. Date Growers Institute Indio, Califonia.Google Scholar
  155. Scoria, R., 1982, In vitro flowering, Horde. Rev., 4: 106–127.Google Scholar
  156. Scowcroft, W.R., 1985, Somaclonal variation: The myth of clonal uniformity. In: Genetic Flux in Plants ( B. Hohn and E.S. Dennis, eds.) pp. 217–245, Springer-Verlag, Vienna.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Selvaratnam, E.M., 1952, Embryo of the coconut, Nature (Load.), 169: 714–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Sento, T., 1972, Studies on seed germination of palms, V. On Chrysalidocorprts lutescens, Mascarena verschaffeltii, and Phoenix dacrylifera, J. Jpn. Soc. Ironic. Sci., 41: 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Sento, T., 1974, Studies on seed germination of palms, VI. On Cocos,utcijera L., Phoenix Iuunilis Royle var. ha nceana Becc. and Phoenix sylvestris Roxb., J. Jpn. Soc. Ilortic. Sci., 42: 350–358.Google Scholar
  160. Sharma, D.R., Kumari, R. and Chowdhury, J.B., 1980, In vitro culture of female date palm (Phoenix dacrylifera L.) tissues, Euphytica, 29: 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Smith, W.K. and Jones, L.H., 1970, Plant propagation through cell culture, Cheer. and Ind. 44: 1399–1401.Google Scholar
  162. Smith, W.K. and Thomas, J.A., 1973, The isolation and in vitro cultivation of cells of Elaeisguineensis, Oleagineux, 28: 123–127.Google Scholar
  163. Srinivasan, C., Litz, R.E., Barker, J. and Norstog, K., 1985, Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet formation from Christmas palm callus, Hortscience, 20: 278–280.Google Scholar
  164. Staritsky, G., 1970, Tissue culture of oil palm (Elaeisguineensis Jacq.) as a tool for its vegetative propagation, Euphvtica, 19: 288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Sudasrip, H., Kaat, H. and Davis, T.A., 1978, Clonal propagation of the coconut via the bulbils, Philip. J. Coconut Stud. 3: 5–14.Google Scholar
  166. Tahardi, S. and Warda-Dalem, K., 1982, Kulture embrio kelapa kopyor in vitro, Menara l’erkebunan, 50: 127–130.Google Scholar
  167. Thanh-Tuyen, N.T. and de Guzman, E.V., 1983, Formation of pollen embryos in cultured anthers of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.), Plant Sci. Lett., 29: 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Tisserat, B., 1979, Propagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) in vino, J. Exp. Bot., 90: 1275–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Tisserat, B., 1981, Date palm tissue culture: Advances in Agricultural Technology, ATT-W-17, United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, pp.50.Google Scholar
  170. Tisserat, B., 1983, Tissue culture of date palms–A new method to propagate an ancient crop–and a short discussion of the California date industry, Principes, 27: 105–117.Google Scholar
  171. Tisserat, B., 1984a, Propagation of date palms by shoot tip cultures, Ilortscience, 19: 230–231.Google Scholar
  172. Tisserat, B., 1984b, Date palm. In: Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, Vol. 2, Crop Species, ( W.R. Sharp, D.A. Evans, P.V. Ammirato and Y. Yamada, eds.), pp. 505–545, Macmillan Publishing Conn pany, New York.Google Scholar
  173. Tisserat, B., 1984e, Clonal propagation: Palms. In: Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics, Vol. 1 Laboratory Procedures and their Applications ( I.K. Vasil, ed.), pp. 74–81, Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
  174. Tisserat, B., 1987, Palms. In: Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry Vol. 3, Cast histories: Gymnosperms, Angiosperms and Palms ( J.M. Bonga and D.J. Duman, eds.), pp. 338–356, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  175. Tisserat, B. and De Mason, D.A., 1985, Occurrence and histological structure of off-shoots and inflorescences produced from Phoenix dacrvlifera L. plant let s in vitro, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 112: 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Tomlinson, P.B., 1970, Monocotyledons–towards an understanding of their morphology and anatomy, Adv. Bot. Res., 3: 207–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Torres, A.M. and Tisserat, B., 1980, Leaf isozymes as genetic markers in date palms, Am. J. Bot., 67: 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Trabut, L., 1921, La multiplication du dattier par semis, C. R. Acad. Agric. Sci., 33: 718–722.Google Scholar
  179. Tsai, J.H., 1980, Lethal yellowing of coconut palms–Search for a vector. In: Hectors of Plant Pathogens ( K.F. Harris and K. Maramorosch, eds.), pp. 177–200, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  180. Tsai, J.H. and Maramorosch, K., 1988, Lethal yellowing, Rev. Trop. Plant l’arhol., 4 (In Press).Google Scholar
  181. Tsai, J.H. and Thomas, D.L., 1981, Transmission of lethal mycoplasma by Mandas crudes. In: Mvcoplasma Diseases of Trees and Shrubs (K. Maramorosch and S.P. Raychaudhuri, eds.), pp. 211–229, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  182. Turner, P.D., 1977, Oil palm (Elacis guineensis.J.). In: Plant health and Quarantine in International Transfer of Genetic Resources ( W.B. Hewitt and L. Chiarappa, eds.), pp. 197–208, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  183. Turner, P.D., 1981, Oil palm diseases and disorders, Incorporated Society of Planters, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  184. Uhl, N.W. and Dransfield, J., 1987, Genera Palmarum, A classification of palms based on the work of Harold E. Moore Jr., The L.H. Bailey Hortorium and the International Palm Society, Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
  185. Vallade, J., 1966a, Aspect morphologique et cytologique de l’embryon quiescent d Eiacisguineensis Jacq., C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. D., 262: 856–859.Google Scholar
  186. Vallade, J., 1966b, L’evolution de l’embryon d’Elacicguincenci.r Jacq. au cours de al germination, C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. D., 262: 989–992.Google Scholar
  187. Vallade J., 1969, Organogenese embryonnaire chez Elacisguineensis Jaeq., Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vegetate, 32: 343–352.Google Scholar
  188. Vouyouklis, G.V., 1981, Une methode de’isolement de protoplastes du Palmier a huile Elacis guincensis Jacq., Phyton (B. Aires), 40: 169–178.Google Scholar
  189. White, P.R., 1949, Growth hormones and tissue growth in plants. In: Survey Progress, Vol. I (G.S. Avery, Jr., ed.), pp. 267–280, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  190. Wicart, G., Mouras, A. and Lutz, A., 1984, Histological study of organogenesis and embryogenesis. in Cyclamen persicun Mill tissue cultures: Evidence for a single organogenetic pattern, Protoplasma, 119: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Wooi, K.C., Wong, C.Y. and Corley, R.H.V., 1982, Tissue Culture of palms- A review. In: Tissue Culture of Economically Important Plants ( A.N. Rao, ed.), pp. 138–144, COSTED and ANBS, Natn. Univ. Singapore.Google Scholar
  192. Yuri, S.J.A., 1987, Propagation of Chilean wine palm Oilmen chilensis) by means of in vitro embryo culture, Principes 31: 183–186.Google Scholar
  193. Zaid, A. and Tisserat, B., 1983, Morphogenetic responses obtained from a variety of somatic explant tissues of date palm, Bot. Mag. Tokyo, 96: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Zaid, A. and Tisserat, B., 1984, Survey of the morphogenetic potential of excised palm embryos in vitro, Hortic. Res., 24: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Zuniga, L.C., 1959, Studies on niakapuno-hearing trees, 1. Segregation of the nut endosperm of artificially pollinated Makapuno-bearing and ordinary coconut trees, Philip. J. Agric., 24: 51–67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abraham D. Krikorian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry, Division of Biological SciencesState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations