Skip to main content

Clinical Trial Design—Industry Perspective

  • Chapter
  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

It is now well recognized that the elderly, defined as individuals over 65 years of age, are growing in numbers and as a proportion of the total population. It is also recognized that this group disproportionately uses medicines. At the present time, for example, the elderly represent about 11% of the U.S. population and are estimated to consume 20–25% of all medications.’ Based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau,2 it is predicted that by 2030 the elderly will increase to about 21% of the U.S. population and consume more than 40% of all drugs. Equally important, the percentage growth of the “old elderly,” those 75 and over, will be even greater.3 The high prevalence of disabilities in the very old increases the chances for therapeutic misadventures. Indeed, it is widely perceived that adverse drug reactions and drug interactions are more common in the elderly than in younger patients. A recent report of the Royal College of Physicians on Adverse Drug Reactions in the Elderly4 identified inappropriate practices by treating physicians as central to this problem. On the other hand, a review by Klein et al. 5 suggests that the incidence of adverse drung reactions may not be greater in elderly patients but the opportunity for such events certainly is. Despite the extensive use of drugs by the elderly, guidance to physicians relative to this population is not widely available; i.e., dosage and precautions specific to the elderly are not commonly found in drung package inserts, therapeutic texts, or

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vestal RE, Dawson GW: Pharmacology and aging, in Finch CE, Schneider EL (eds): Handbook of the Biology of Aging, ed 2., New York, Van Nostrand, 1985, p 744.

    Google Scholar 

  2. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1970 Census of the Population.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coe RM: Comprehensive care of the elderly, in Cape RDT, Coe RM, Rossman I (eds): Fundamentals of Geriatric Medicine. New York, Raven Press, 1983, p 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Report of the Royal College of Physicians: Medication for the elderly. J Roy Coll Physicians London 1984; 18:7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klein LE, German PS, Levine DM: Adverse drug reactions among the elderly: A reassessment. J Am Geriatr Soc 1981; 29:525–530.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shock NW: Aging of regulatory mechanisms, in Cape RDT, Coe RM, Rossman I (eds): Fundamentals of Geriatric Medicine. New York, Raven Press, 1983, p 51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fleg JL, Gerstenblith G, Lakatta, EG: Pathophysiology of the aging heart and circulation, in Messerlie FH (ed): Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly. Boston, Martinus Nijhoff, 1984, p 11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abrams WB: Introducing a new drug into clinical practice. Anesthesiology 1971; 35:176–192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leber P: Establishing the efficacy of drugs with psychogeriatric indications, in Crook T, Ferris S, Bartus, R (eds): Assessment in Geriatric Psychopharmacology. New Canaan, CT, Mark Powley Associates, 1983, p 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anello C: FDA principles on clinical investigations. FDA Papers 1970; 4:14–15; 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  11. FDA Guidelines: General considerations for the clinical evaluation of drugs. US Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, September 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman LM, Furberg C, DeMets DL (eds): Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. Boston, John Wright, PSG Inc, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abrams WB: The development of clinical protocols, in Finkel MJ (ed): Factors Influencing Clinical Research Success. Mount Kisco, NY, Futura Publishing Co., 1976, p 7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Williams ME, Retchin SM: Clinical geriatric research: Still in adolescence. J Am Geriatr Soc 1984; 32:851–857.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. FDA Discussion Paper on Testing of Drugs in the Elderly, Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration. Memorandum from Temple R, September 30, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Workshop on Proposed FDA Guidelines for Clinical Evaluation of Drugs Being Developed for Use in the Elderly, sponsored by the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics and Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, Sept. 13–14, 1984, cochairmen: Reidenberg MJ, Abrams WB.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Crooks, J: Report prepared for the Committee on Safety of Medicines, England.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rotenberg KS (Food and Drug Administration): IND/NDA Guidelines for Bioavailability Submission. Presented at 20th Annual International Industrial Pharmacy Conf., Austin, Texas, Feb. 24, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lindeman RD, Klingler EL, Jr: Fluid, electrolyte, trace mineral and renal problems in the elderly: With emphasis directed at the effects of renal impairment on drug pharmacology, in Vestal RE (ed): Drug Treatment in the Elderly. Australia, ADIS Health Sc. Press, 1984, p 116.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bjornsson TD: Use of serum creatinine concentrations to determine renal function. Clin Pharmacokin 1979; 4:220–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodda RE, Davis RL: Determining the probability of an important difference in bioavailability. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980; 28:247–252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kane RA, Kane RL: Assessing the Elderly: A Practical Guide to Measurement. Lexington, MA, Lexington Books, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Crook T, Ferris S, Bartus R (eds): Assessment in Geriatric Psychopharmacology. New Canaan, CT, Mark Powley Associates, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vestal RE, Wood AJJ, Shand DG: Reduced beta-adrenoceptor sensitivity in the elderly. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1979; 26:181–186.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Castleden CM, George, CF: The effect of ageing on the hepatic clearance of propranolol. BrJ Clin Pharmacol 1979; 7:49–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Friedman JA, Chalmers TC, Smith H, et al.: The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. N Engl J Med 1978; 299:690–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. National Center for Health Statistics: Chronic Conditions and Limitations of Activity and Mobility: United States, July 1967 Vital and Health Statistics, PHS Pub. No. 1000-Series 10-No. 61. Washington, DC, Public Health Service, US Government Printing Office, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Box GED, Tian GC: Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis, Reading, MA, Addison Wesley Publishing Co, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Katz S, Branch LG, Branson MH, Papsidero JA, Beck JC, Greer DS: Active life expectancy. N Engl J Med 1983; 309:1218–1224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Katz S, Akpom CA: A measure of primary sociobiological functions. Int J Health Sery 1976; 6:493–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. The Norwegian Multicentre Study Group: Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. N EnglJ Med 1981; 304:801–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT) Research Group Report: A randomized trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction: I. Mortality results.JAMA 1982; 247:1707–1717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lipid Research Clinics Program. The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results: 1. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease, and 2. The relationship of reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease to cholesterol lowering. JAMA 1984; 251:351–364, 365–374.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Plenum Publishing Corporation

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abrams, W.B., Rodda, B.E. (1986). Clinical Trial Design—Industry Perspective. In: Cutler, N.R., Narang, P.K. (eds) Drug Studies in the Elderly. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1253-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1253-6_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1255-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1253-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics