Advertisement

The Primary Mental Ability

  • Lloyd G. Humphreys
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 14)

Abstract

My intent in this paper is to bring up to date a discussion of correlational models in intelligence which I started in the American Psychologist in 1962 to provide data concerning the importance of general intelligence, and in the end to renew my support for the approach to definition and theory of Godfrey Thomson (1919).

Keywords

General Factor Item Type Intelligence Test General Intelligence Order Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkin R., Bray, R., Davison, M., Herzberger, S., Humphreys, L., and Selzer, U., Ability factor differentiation, grades 5–11. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977, 1, 65–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkin, R., Bray, R., Davison, M., Herzberger, S., Humphreys, L, and Selzer, U. Cross lagged panel analysis of 16 cognitive measures. Journal for Research in Child Development, 1977, 48, 944–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cattell, R. Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963, 54, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guilford, J. The nature of intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
  5. Guttman, L. A new approach to factor analysis: the radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. (Ed.), Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. Glencoe, III.: Free Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  6. Horn, J. Organization of abilities and the development of intelligence. Psychological Review, 1968, 75, 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Humphreys, L. The organization of human abilities. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Humphreys, L. The misleading distinction between aptitude and achievement tests. In D. R. Green (Ed.), The aptitude achievement distinction, Monterey, California: CTB/McGraw Hill, 1974, 262–274.Google Scholar
  9. Humphreys, L. The construct of general intelligence. Intelligence, 1979, 3, 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Humphreys, L. and Parsons, C. A simplex process model for describing differences between cross-lagged correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humphreys, L. and Parsons, C. Piagetian tasks measure intelligence and intelligence tests assess cognitive development: A reanalysis. Intelligence, 1979, in press.Google Scholar
  12. Humphreys, L. and Parsons, C., and Park, R., Dimensions involved in differences among school means of cognitive measures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979, 16, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunt, E. Varieties of cognitive power. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. Schmid, J. and Leiman, J. The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 1957, 22, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spearman, C. The theory of two factors. Psychological Review, 1914, 21, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spearman, C. The abilities of man. New York: MacMillan, 1927.Google Scholar
  17. Thomson, G. On the cause of hierarchical order among correlation coefficients. Proceedings of Royal Society, A, 1919, 95.Google Scholar
  18. Thurstone, L. Primary mental abihties. Psychometric Monograph, 1938, (No. 1).Google Scholar
  19. Thurstone, L. Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947, XIX, 515.Google Scholar
  20. Vernon, P. The structure of human abilities. New York: Wiley, 1950.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lloyd G. Humphreys
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations