Active Perceiving and the Reflection-Impulsivity Dimension
Zelniker and Jeffrey (1976, 1979) have proposed that performance differences on the MFFT, used to index reflection-impul-sivity, stem from preferences for either detail or global information processing. Our studies, however, indicate that differences in performance reflect the tendency to make use of active perceptual search.
KeywordsExposure Condition Cognitive Style Accuracy Score Prefer Strategy Active Perceiving
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Kagan, J. Impulsive and reflective Children: Significance of conceptual tempo. In J. D. Krumboltz (Ed.), Learning and the educational process. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.Google Scholar
- Kagan, J., Rosman, B. L., Day, D., Albert, J., and Phillips, W. Information processing in the Child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 1964, (1, whole no. 578).Google Scholar
- Weiner, A. S. and Bergonsky, M. D. Development of selective attention in reflective and impulsive Children. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D. C., 1975.Google Scholar
- Wright, J. C., and Vliestra, A. G. Reflection-impulsivity and information processing from three to nine years of age. In M. Fine (Ed.), Intervention with hyperactivity. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1977.Google Scholar
- Zelniker, T. and Jeffrey, W. E. Reflective and impulsive Children: Strategies of information processing underlying differences in problem solving. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1976, 41 (5, Serial No. 168).Google Scholar
- Zelniker, T. and Jeffrey, E. Attention and cognitive style in Children. In G. Hale and M. Lewis (Eds.), Attention and the development of attentional skills. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.Google Scholar