Process Theories: Form or Substance? A Discussion of the Papers by Butterfield, Das and Jarman
The most general common assumption underlying the papers by Butterfield, Das and Jarman—and many others presented at this Conference—implies a sharp distinction between process and performance. More specifically, competent performance is seen as the result of an interaction between task demands and various cognitive options the individual may or may not have at his disposal. Das presented one view of what those options might be; Jarman demonstrated the effect that stimulus demands have upon the range of options, differentially for high and low ability groups; and Butterfield outlined a research strategy that promises to integrate task demands and cognitive availability, not only with respect to the concerns of the other two speakers, but over a very broad front indeed.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Block, J.H. (Ed.) Mastery Learning: Theory and Practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.Google Scholar
- Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. and Austin, G. A. A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley, 1956.Google Scholar
- Case, R. The underlying mechanism of intellectual development. In J. Biggs and J. R. Kirby (Eds.) Instructional Processes and Individual Differences in Learning. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
- Das, J. P., Cummins, J., Kirby, J. R., and Jarman, R. F. Simultaneous and successive processes, language and mental abilities. Canadian Psychological Review, 1979, 20, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, M Children’s Minds. T London: Macmillan, 1978.Google Scholar
- Jensen, A. R. Genetics and Education. London: Methuen, 1972.Google Scholar
- Krywaniuk, L. W. and Das, J. P. Cognitive strategies in native children: analysis and intervention. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1976, 22, 271–280.Google Scholar
- Siegel, L. and Brainerd, C. (Eds.) Alternatives to Piaget. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
- Tyler, L. E. Individuality. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1978.Google Scholar
- Zeaman, D, and House, B. J. The role of attention in retardate discrimination. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.) Handbook of Mental Deficiency. New York: McGraw Hill, 1963.Google Scholar
Section 1: Reference Notes
- 1.Biggs, J., and Kirby, J. R. Processing styles, study strategies and school performance. Project funded by the Australian Research Grants Committee, 1979.Google Scholar