Advertisement

A Model of Cognitive Development

  • J. A. Keats
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 14)

Abstract

The fact that the intelligence quotient in either of its common forms is an inadequate representation of cognitive development has been widely recognized for many decades. Most longitudinal studies over wide age ranges indicate that with at least a considerable proportion of subjects there are systematic trends in IQ changes. One of the recent studies, McCall (1973), classified subjects in terms of types of changes and was able to relate type of change to type of child raising practice in a number of cases. Such studies indicate that a one parameter representation of cognitive development is inadequate.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayley, N. On the growth of intelligence. American Psychologist, 1955, 10, 805–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. British Ability Scales. Windsor: NFER Publishing Co. Limited, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. Halford, G. S., and Keats, J. A. An integration. In J. A. Keats, K. F. Collis and G. S. Halford (Eds.), Cognitive Development: Research based on a neo-Piagetian approach. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Inhelder, B. The diagnosis of reasoning in the mentally retarded, (translation from French, 1942), 1968.Google Scholar
  5. Keats, J. A. A proposed form for a developmental function. In J. A. Keats, K. F. Collis and G. S. Halford (Eds.), Cognitive development: Research based on a neo-Piagetian approach. Chichester: John Vrtley and Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. McCall, R. B., Appelbaum, M. I., and Hogarty, P. S. Developmental changes in mental performance. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1973, 38 (3, Serial No. 150).Google Scholar
  7. Munsinger, H. The adopted child’s IQ: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 1975, S2, 623–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Piaget, J. The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rasch, G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogoisch Institut, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. Skodak, M., and Skeels, H. M. A final follow-up study of one hundred adopted children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1949, 75, 85–125. ~Google Scholar
  11. Spada, H., and Kluwe, R. Psychometric models of intellectual development and their reference to the theory of Piaget. Draft paper. Institute for Science Education, University of Kiel, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. Keats
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of NewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations