Advertisement

Training and Logic: Comment on Magali Bovet’s Paper

  • P. E. Bryant
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 14)

Abstract

Magali Bovet’s main point is that people take to training experiments for a variety of reasons and with a number of different aims. She argues that we ought to classify these experiments into different types and she surely is right.

Keywords

Training Experiment Causal Hypothesis Transitive Inference Logical Mechanism Causal Question 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borke, H. (1978) Piaget’s view of social interaction and the theoretical construction of empathy. In (Eds) Siegel, L. and Brainerd, C. Alternatives to Piaget. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brainerd, C. (1978a) Learning research and Piagetian theory. In (Eds) Siegel, L. and Brainerd, C. Alternatives to Piaget. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brainerd, C. (1978b) Piaget’s Theory of Intelligence. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bryant, P. E. (1974) Perception and Understanding in Young Children. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, P. E. and Trabasso, T. (1971) Transitive inferences and memory in young children. Nature, 232, 456–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryant, P. E. and Kopytynska, H. (1976) Spontaneous measurement by young children. Nature, 260, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donaldson, M. (1978) Children’s Minds. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
  8. Elkind, D. (1967) Piaget’s conservation problems. Child Development, 15–27.Google Scholar
  9. Gelman, R. (1969) Conservation acquisition: a problem of learning to attend to relevant attributes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7, 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inhelder, B., Sinclair, H. and Bovet, M. (1974.) Learning and the Development of Cognition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Lefebre, M. and Pinard, A. (1972) Apprentissage de la conservation des quantites par une methode de conflit cognitif. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 4, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McGarrigle, J. and Donaldson, M. (1978) Conservation accidents. Cognition.Google Scholar
  13. Sinclair-de Zwart, H. (1967) Acquisition du language et Developpement de la Pensee. Pans: Dunod.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. Bryant
    • 1
  1. 1.Oxford UniversityOxfordEngland

Personalised recommendations