Advertisement

The Korean writing system: An alphabet? A syllabary? a logography?

  • Insup Taylor
Part of the Nato Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 13)

Abstract

The Korean writing system, Hangul, is an “alphabetic syllabary” which employs many of the good and few of the bad features of an alphabet, a syllabary, and a logography. An alphabet can represent any word in the language, one phoneme at a time, but the phoneme-grapheme correspondence may be imperfect, and a single word may require a long array of letters. A syllable is a more stable unit of language than a phoneme, but a simple syllabary is practical only for a language with few different syllables. A logography, with a unique symbol for each morpheme, requires more complex and more numerous symbols. Korean text uses Hangul mixed with Chinese characters in a manner which aids reading.

Keywords

Target Letter Chinese Character Test Word Rhyme Word Alphabetic System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. 1.
    Kinney, G. C., Marsetta, M., & Showman, D. J. Studies in display symbol legibility. Part XII. The legibility of alphanumeric symbols for digitized television. Bedford, Mass.: The Mitre Corporation, ESD-TR-66,117, 1966.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sakamoto, T. On reading skills of vertical versus horizontal sentences. Paper read at the 3rd Annual Congress of the Japanese Association of Educational Psychology, Nagoya, 1961.Google Scholar

References

  1. Brooks, L. Visual pattern in fluent word identification. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. Diringer, D. The alphabet. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. Detection errors on “the” and “and”: Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory & Cognition, 1977, 5, 636–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelb, I.J. A study of writing (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  5. Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P. Teaching reading by use of a syllabary. Reading Research Quarterly, 1973, 8, 447–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gray, W. S. The teaching of reading and writing. Paris: UNESCO, 1956.Google Scholar
  7. Hatta, T. Recognition of Japanese Kanji and Hirakana in the left and right visual Avoids. Japanese Psychological Research, 1978, 20, 51–59.Google Scholar
  8. Jensen, H. Sign, symbol and script. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Karlgren, B. Sound and symbol in Chinese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  10. Kitao, N., Hatta, T., Ishida, M., & Babazono, Y. Concreteness, hieroglyphicity and familiarity of Kanji. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 1977, 48, 105–111 (in Japanese with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kolers, P. A. Three stages of reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic: studies on reading. New York: Basic Books, 1970.Google Scholar
  12. Kuo, W. F. A preliminary study of reading disabilities in the Republic of China. Collection of papers by National Taiwan University, 1978, 20, 57–78.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, J.-H. Hun-minjeoung eum [Correct pronunciation of lettersfor teaching people]: An explanation and translation. Seoul, Korea: Korean Library Science Research Institute, 1972 (in English and Korean).Google Scholar
  14. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fisher, F. W., & Carter, B. Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974, 18, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Makita, K. The rarity of reading disability in Japanese children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1968, 38, 599–614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin, S. E. Nonalphabetic writing systems: Some observations. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  17. O’Regan, K. Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 1979, 25, 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park, S., & Arbuckle, T. Y. Ideograms versus alphabets: Effects of script on memory in “biscriptual” Korean subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977, 3, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rayner, K. Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes. Memory & Cognition, 1977, 5, 443–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sasanuma, S. Kana and Kanji processing in Japanese aphasics. Brain and Language, 1975, 2, 369–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schindler, R. M. The effect of prose content on visual search for letter. Memory & Cognition, 1978, 2, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Taylor, I. Writing systems and reading. In T. G. Waller &G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. II). New York: Academic Press (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Insup Taylor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations