Skip to main content

What is Science?

  • Chapter
The Primordial Bond

Abstract

Thales bridged the gap between natural philosophy and science because he began the search for proof. But Thaïes didn’t always find proof—and neither does science. Indeed, science is in large part the very search for proof. Albert Einstein, certainly one of our greatest contemporary scientists, was a man who had a wealth of scientific knowledge. When asked how long it would take to confirm his theory of relativity, he is reputed to have said that while no number of experiments could prove him right, one could prove him wrong. If science isn’t strictly the “knowledge of facts” or the “exact observation” of Nature that the dictionary makes it out to be, what is it?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Notes

  1. Funk and Wagnall’s Standard College Dictionary, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York, 1963, p. 1203.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Manheim, Ralph, and John Willett, editors, Brecht: The Collected Plays, Vol. 5, Vintage Books, New York, 1972, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bronowski, Jacob, Science and Human Values, Perennial Library, New York, 1965, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For an alternative view of the proper role of the scientist in governing society, see Joel Primack and Frank von Hippel, Advice and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena, Basic Books, New York, 1974, 299 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bronowski, op. cit., p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frazer, Sir James George, The Golden Bough, Macmillan, New York, 1972, pp. 824, 825.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagel, Ernest, The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rose, H. J., A Handbook of Greek Mythology, Dutton, New York, 1959, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagel, op. cit., p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The “holists” believe that there are structures in nature that are fundamental characteristics of the whole and not merely “the sum of its parts,” as reductionists believe. One example, the “Gaia hypothesis” is explored in Chapter 7. Briefly, in the words of James E. Lovelock (author of Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979, p. 1), “the quest for Gaia is an attempt to find the largest living creature on Earth,” which the author believes could be all of life combined. In the philosophical literature, holism is also debated. For example, see Chapter 4 of Gregory Bateson, Mind and Nature, A Necessary Unity, Dutton, New York, 1979;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis J. Perelman, The Global Mind: Beyond the Limits to Growth, Mason Charter, New York, 1976, p. 41;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arthur Koestler and J. R. Smythies, editors, Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences, Beacon Press, Boston, 1969, 438 pp.;

    Google Scholar 

  16. and Ervin Laszlo, Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Toward a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought, Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1972, 328 pp. For a highly mathematical treatment of the issue of “self-organization” in physics,

    Google Scholar 

  17. see G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine, Self-Organization Non-equilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations, Wiley, New York, 1977, 491 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Culler, J., Structural Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1975, pp. 24–30.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. For an interesting view of science and the scientific method, see M. Goldstein and I. F. Goldstein, How We Know: An Exploration of the Scientific Process, Plenum, New York, 1978, 357 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frisinger, H. H., The History of Meteorology: To 1800, Science History Publications, New York, 1977, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  22. This passage is from Aristotle’s work “On Generation and Corruption.” We used Richard P. McKeon, editor, The Basic Works of Aristotle, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1941, pp. 522–523.

    Google Scholar 

  23. This passage from Aristotle’s Meteorologica is found in Frisinger, op. cit., pp. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Stephen H. Schneider and Lynne Morton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneider, S.H., Morton, L. (1981). What is Science?. In: The Primordial Bond. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1057-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1057-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1057-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics