Skip to main content

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to designate major impediments to effective nutrition program evaluation, and to suggest methods of overcoming these obstacles in order to satisfy the information requirements of evaluation users. We perceive five major impediments: user designation, technical and financial constraints, psychological resistance, political factors and the literacy barrier. Each of these will be described and means of removing or minimizing them will be presented. After this analysis of individual impediments and requirements, we will discuss one particular area of evaluation that we believe has been inadequately explored and yet holds considerable potential for enriching the utility and meaningfulness of evaluation. This area is community participation in evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Austin, J.E. (1978). The Perilous Journey of Nutrition Evaluation. Am. J. Clin. Nut. (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habicht, J.P. (1973). Standardization Procedures for Quantitative Epidemiological Field Methods. Manual of Internationally Comparable Growth Studies in Latin America and the Caribbean, Ch. 7, PAHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrata, L. (1976). “Manual for Community Based Under-Fives Weighing Program”. Yayasan Indonesia Sejahtera, Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, A. et al. (undated). “An Evalution Guide for Adult Basic Education Programs”. Center for Adult Education, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappe, F.M. and J. Collins. (1977). “Food First:Beyond the Myth of Scarcity”. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortorell, R., J.P. Habicht, C. Yarbrough, G. Guzman, and R.E. Klein. (1974). The Identification and Evaluation of Measurement Variability in the Anthropometry of Preschool Children (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. (1970). The Modifications of Attitudes and behavior. In: “Malnutrition is a Problem of Ecology”. Bibl. Nutr. Diet. 14. Karger. Basel/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. (1976). Building the Evaluation of Communication Activities into Family Planning Programmes. In: “Evaluation Research on Family Planning Communication”, E. Rogers and R. Agarwala Rogers, eds. UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. and E.J. Baker (1976). Guidelines for Evaluation Research on Family Planning Communication. E. Rogers and R.A.W. Rogers, eds. UNESCO Monograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, J.E. (1977). Preparing for the Next Round: Convalescent Care after Acute Infection. A position paper for the National Academy of Sciences Food and Nutrition Board. Workshop on Effective Interventions to Reduce Infection in Malnourished Populations (13-16 June, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakir, A. and D. Morley, (1974). Measuring Malnutrition. The Lancet, April 20, 758–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, S. (1978). Whence-We-Come and Where-We-Go: Research, Experimentation, and Evaluation in Adult Education. Under publication in forthcoming book on adult education in Africa. Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, M.F. (1977a). Directions for the evaluation of Nutrition Education. In: “Teaching Nutrition in Developing Countries”, K.W. Shack, (eds.) Meals for Millions Foundation, Santa Monica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, M.F. (1977b). Breast Feeding and Growth Status in Two Preschool Child Publication; Reference Standards for Maximum Thigh Circumference from 0-5 Years: Thigh Circumference-an Age-Independent Screening Index for Preschool Nutrition Interventions. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, M.F. (1978). Weaning Food Development in Yako, Upper Volta: A Case Study. In: “Nutrition Intervention Manual”, J. Austin et al. (eds.). Under preparation, HIID, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, M.F. (1979). The Derivation of a Reference Standard for Maximum Thigh Circumference of Preschool Children, Aged 0-5 Years. Human Biol. (forthcoming in Feb. issue).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zeitlin, M.F., Austin, J.E. (1980). Impediments and Requirements of Nutrition Evaluation. In: Santos, W., Lopes, N., Barbosa, J.J., Chaves, D., Valente, J.C. (eds) Nutrition and Food Science: Present Knowledge and Utilization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1030-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1030-3_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1032-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1030-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics