Skip to main content

Multidimensional Analysis in the Study of Environmental Behavior and Environmental Design

  • Chapter
Human Behavior and Environment

Abstract

The literature on environmental knowing is largely problem-oriented (though see Moore and Golledge, 1976, for statements of current theory), and finding solutions to these problems has occupied the greatest part of the total research effort in this area. So intent has this search been on collecting and representing cognitive information that the equally important task of determining how to analyze results has been relegated to the background. An inevitable result of this neglect can be the selection of inappropriate analytical methods for the level of data collected. To help overcome this problem, I present in this paper a variety of multivariate and multidimensional analytical techniques. The selection is not exhaustive; rather, it attempts to illustrate some of the relationships between data type or representational form and a subset of appropriate analytical methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelson, R. P. A. A technique and a model for multidimensional attitude scaling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1954, 15, 405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, D. Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and Behavior, 1970, 2, 100–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, D. & Mair, J. M. The Evaluation of Personal Constructs. London: Academic Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R., & Wood, D. Comparative developmental analysis of individual and aggregated cognitive maps of London. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, R. Cognitive distance in urban space. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Geography, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadwallader, M. T. Cognitive distance in intraurban space. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 316–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Stephen. The city of the mind, reprinted in H. M. Proshansky, W. A. Ittelson, and L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental Psychology, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. 1970. Pp. 518–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S., & Schissler, D. The city as a trip: perceptual selection and memory in the view from the road. Environment and Behavior, 1969, I, 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. Categorical conjoint measurement. Paper presented at Mathematical Psychology Meetings, Ann Arbor, Mich., August 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. Non-parametric multidimensional analysis of paired- comparison data. Paper presented at joint meeting of Psychometric and Psychon- omic Societies, Niagara Falls, N.Y., October 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. & Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 283–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. J., & Carroll, J. D. How to use PROFIT, a computer program for property fitting by optimizing nonlinear or linear conditions. Murray Hill, N.Y.: Bell Laboratories, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. V., & Cadwallader, M. Locational stress and residential mobility. Environment and Behavior, 1973, 5, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. H. The comprehension of the everyday physical environment. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1968,34, 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desbarats, J. Semantic structure and perceived environment. Geographical Analysis, 1976, 2(4), 453–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R. The cognitive structure of an urban shopping center,” Environment and Behavior, 1970, 2, 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R. Personal constructions of personal construct theory. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R., & Stea, D. Image and environment. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, G., & Bratfisch, D. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: A psychological mechanism. Acta Psychologica, 1965, 24, 446–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, G. O. Environmental and spatial preference of interstate migrants in the United States.In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 249–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, N., & Berry, B. J. Atlas of economic development. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golant, S., & Burton, I. A semantic differential experiment in the interpretation and grouping of environmental hazards, Geographical Analysis, 2(2), 1970, 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G. Methods and methodological issues in environmental cognition research. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Strouds-burg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 300–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G., & Rayner, J. N. Analysis of cognitive maps using spectral analysis. Paper presented at Psychometric Society Meetings, Iowa City, Iowa, April 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G., & Rayner, J. N. Cognitive configurations of a city. vol. 2. Columbus: Ohio State University Research Foundation and Department of Geography, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G., & Rushton, G. Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G., Rivizzigno, V. L., & Spector, A. Learning about a city: Analysis by M.D.S.In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, P. Problems of space preference measures and relationships. Geographical Analysis, 1969, I, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, P., & White, R. Mental maps. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1974.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. Applied multidimensional scaling. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L, A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, R. The structuring of sociological spaces. Transactions of the Fourth World Congress of Sociology, 1961, 3, 315–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, E. J., and J. F. Betak, Some preliminary findings on the cognitive meaning of external privacy in housing.In Honikman, Basil (Ed.), Proceedings, E.D.R.A. 5 (#11), 1974. Pp. 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • HaiTison, J., & Sarre, P. Personal construct theory in the measurement of environmental images, I: Problem.s and methods. Environment and Behavior, 1971, 3, 351–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., & Sarre, P. Personal construct theory and the measurement of environmental images; II: Applications. Environment and Behavior, 1974, 6, 3–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honikman, B. Personal construct theory and environmental evaluation. In W. F. E. Preiser (Ed.), Environmental design research. Vol. 1. Stroudsburg, Pa. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973. Pp. 242–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honikman, B. Personal construct theory and environmental meaning: Applications to urban design. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, F. E., & Reynolds, D. R. Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behavior. Economic Geography, 1971, 47(4), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R, Images of the retailing environment: An example of the use of the repertory grid methodology. Environment and Behavior, 1974, 6, 470–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indow, T., & Uchizono, T. Multidimensional mapping of Munsell colors varying in hue and chroma. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 59, 321–329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 241–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. Further contributions to the theory of paired comparisons. Biometrics, 1955 11 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York, W. W. Norton, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemmer, E. T., & Shrimpton, N. W. Preference scaling via a modification of Shepard’s proximity analysis method. Human Factors, 1963, 5, 163–168.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. L., & Menchik, M. D. Conjoint preference estimation for residential land use policy evaluations. In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.) Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio University Press, 1976. Pp. 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1964a, 29, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychome- trika, 1964b, 29, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data. The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B, methodological), 1965, 27, 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. Linear transformation of multivariate data to reveal clustering. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972. Pp. 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J., Young, K., & Seery, J. How to use KYST, a Very Flexible Program to do Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding, Unpublished ms. Murray Hill, N.J.: Bell Laboratories, (undated).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C. New computer developments in pattern analysis and nonmetric techniques. In Proceedings, I.B.M. symposium: Computers in psychological research. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C. An IBM 7090 program for Guttman-Lingoes conjoint measurement, I. Behavioral Science 1967, 12, 501–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J. J. Information processing theory and functional form in spatial behavior. In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 211–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueck, V. Cognitive and affective components of residential preferences for cities: A pilot study. In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 273–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, R. An analysis of migrant’s distance and preference spaces in Canada, 1949–1968. Paper read at annual meeting. Western Regional Science Association, San Diego, February 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. The image of the city. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. Foreword. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. v-viii.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, R. C. Relations between factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81(8), 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, V. The multidimensional analysis of “elastic” distances. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966, 19, 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. J. An empirical evaluation of multidimensional successive intervals. Psy- chometrika, 1956, 21, 367–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. T. Spatial relations ability and developmental levels of urban cognitive mapping.Man-Environment Systems, 1975, 5, 247–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. T. Theory and research in the development of environmental knowing. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 137–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. T., & Golledge, R. G. Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napior, D. Nonmetric multidimensional techniques for summated ratings. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972. Pp. 158–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, D. Metric for comparison of multidimensional scalings. Unpublished ms., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostendorp, A., & Berlyne, D. E. Dimensions in the perception of architecture (unpublished manuscript). Department of Psychology, University of Toronto (no date).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peay, E. R. Nonmetric grouping: Clusters and cliques, Psychometrika, 1975, 40(3), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivizzigno, V. L. Brief explanations and apphcations of KYST. TORSCA-9, HICLUST, INDSCAL and CONGRU using control group data. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Cognitive configurations of a city. Vol. 1. Columbus: Ohio State University Research Foundation and Department of Geography, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivizzigno, V. L. Cognitive representations of an urban area. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Geography, Ohio State Univerisity, Columbus, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, G. Preferences and choice in different environments. Proceedings, 1971, Association of American Geographers, 3, 146–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwind, P. J. Spatial preferences of migrants for regions: The example of Maine, Proceedings, Association of American Geographers, 1971, 3, 150–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, I. Psychometrika, 1962a, 27, 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, II. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. Metric structures in ordinal data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966, 3, 287–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. Introduction to Volume 1. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972. Pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects. Psychometrika, 1974, 39, 373–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Carroll, J. D. Parametric representation of nonlinear data structure. Multivariate Analysis, 1966, A.F. 33 (615). 3016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Kruskal, J. Nonmetric methods for scaling and factor analysis. American Psychologist, 1964, 19, 557–558 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K., & Nerlove, S. B. Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972 (2 vols.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. Non-parametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. The analysis of personal preference. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1960,13, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. Notes on INGRID, 67. London: Biometrics Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. The principal components of a repertory grid. Privately published under a grant from the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom, 1969a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, P. Theory and technique of the repertory grid. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1969b, 115, 1287–1296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A. Evaluation of clustering methods. In A. J. Cole (Ed.), Numerical Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R., & Sneath, P. H. A. Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, L, & Domoney, D. Single subject incomplete designs for nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 1974, 39, 469–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, A. An analysis of variations in the representations of cognitive images of an urban environment. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Geography, Ohio State University, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, Y., Young, F., & de Leeuw, T. How to use ALSCAL. Unpublished ms. Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 1927, 34, 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. The geometry of mental maps. In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgerson, W.S. Multidimensional scaling, I: Theory and methods. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, R. C., & Bailey, D. E. The B.C. Try computer system of cluster and factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 1966, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. Relations between multidimensional scaling and three-mode factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1972, 37, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R., & Messick, S. An individual difference model for multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 333–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. A general theory of polynomial conjoint measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1967, 4, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H., Jr. Hierarchical groupings to optimize an objective function.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1963,58, 236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wish, M. Notes on the variety, appropriateness, and choice of proximity measures. Unpublished paper. Bell Laboratory Workshop on M.D.S., Murray Hill, N.J., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wish, M., Deutsch, M., & Biener, L. Differences in perceived similarity of nations. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove, (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. Vol. 2. New York: Seminar Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill, J. Searching for the environment in environmental cognition research: A commentary on research strategy. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 385–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, F. W. A model for polynomial conjoint analysis algorithms. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972a. Pp. 69–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, F. W. POLYCON users manual. Report 104. Chapel Hill, N.C.: L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Labs., 1972b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, F. W. An asymmetric Euclidean model.for multi-process asymmetric data. Paper prepared for U.S.-Japan seminar on Theory, Methods and Applications of M.D.S. and Related Techniques, San Diego, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, F. W., & Torgerson, W. S. TORSCA: A Fortram IV program for Shepard-Kruskal M.D.S. analysis. Behavioral Science, 1967, 12, 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., & Householder, A. S. Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances. Psychometrika, 1938, 3, 19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zannaras, G. An analysis of cognitive and objective characteristics of the city: Their influence on movements to the city center. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Geography, Ohio state University, Columbus, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, R., & Rivizzigno, V. L. Mapping cognitive structure of urban areas with M.D.S.: A prehminary report. Columbus, Ohio State University, Department of Geography Discussion Paper 42, 1974

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Golledge, R.G. (1977). Multidimensional Analysis in the Study of Environmental Behavior and Environmental Design. In: Altman, I., Wohlwill, J.F. (eds) Human Behavior and Environment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0808-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0808-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0810-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0808-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics