Abstract
The literature on environmental knowing is largely problem-oriented (though see Moore and Golledge, 1976, for statements of current theory), and finding solutions to these problems has occupied the greatest part of the total research effort in this area. So intent has this search been on collecting and representing cognitive information that the equally important task of determining how to analyze results has been relegated to the background. An inevitable result of this neglect can be the selection of inappropriate analytical methods for the level of data collected. To help overcome this problem, I present in this paper a variety of multivariate and multidimensional analytical techniques. The selection is not exhaustive; rather, it attempts to illustrate some of the relationships between data type or representational form and a subset of appropriate analytical methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abelson, R. P. A. A technique and a model for multidimensional attitude scaling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1954, 15, 405–418.
Appleyard, D. Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and Behavior, 1970, 2, 100–117.
Bannister, D. & Mair, J. M. The Evaluation of Personal Constructs. London: Academic Press, 1968.
Beck, R., & Wood, D. Comparative developmental analysis of individual and aggregated cognitive maps of London. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 173–184.
Briggs, R. Cognitive distance in urban space. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Geography, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1972.
Cadwallader, M. T. Cognitive distance in intraurban space. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 316–334.
Carr, Stephen. The city of the mind, reprinted in H. M. Proshansky, W. A. Ittelson, and L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental Psychology, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. 1970. Pp. 518–532.
Carr, S., & Schissler, D. The city as a trip: perceptual selection and memory in the view from the road. Environment and Behavior, 1969, I, 7–35.
Carroll, J. D. Categorical conjoint measurement. Paper presented at Mathematical Psychology Meetings, Ann Arbor, Mich., August 1969.
Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. Non-parametric multidimensional analysis of paired- comparison data. Paper presented at joint meeting of Psychometric and Psychon- omic Societies, Niagara Falls, N.Y., October 1964.
Carroll, J. D. & Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 283–319.
Chang, J. J., & Carroll, J. D. How to use PROFIT, a computer program for property fitting by optimizing nonlinear or linear conditions. Murray Hill, N.Y.: Bell Laboratories, 1972.
Clark, W. A. V., & Cadwallader, M. Locational stress and residential mobility. Environment and Behavior, 1973, 5, 29–41.
Craik, K. H. The comprehension of the everyday physical environment. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1968,34, 27–37.
Desbarats, J. Semantic structure and perceived environment. Geographical Analysis, 1976, 2(4), 453–467.
Downs, R. The cognitive structure of an urban shopping center,” Environment and Behavior, 1970, 2, 13–39.
Downs, R. Personal constructions of personal construct theory. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 71–87.
Downs, R., & Stea, D. Image and environment. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.
Ekman, G., & Bratfisch, D. Subjective distance and emotional involvement: A psychological mechanism. Acta Psychologica, 1965, 24, 446–453.
Ewing, G. O. Environmental and spatial preference of interstate migrants in the United States.In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 249–273.
Ginsberg, N., & Berry, B. J. Atlas of economic development. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1969.
Golant, S., & Burton, I. A semantic differential experiment in the interpretation and grouping of environmental hazards, Geographical Analysis, 2(2), 1970, 120–134.
Golledge, R. G. Methods and methodological issues in environmental cognition research. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Strouds-burg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 300–315.
Golledge, R. G., & Rayner, J. N. Analysis of cognitive maps using spectral analysis. Paper presented at Psychometric Society Meetings, Iowa City, Iowa, April 1975.
Golledge, R. G., & Rayner, J. N. Cognitive configurations of a city. vol. 2. Columbus: Ohio State University Research Foundation and Department of Geography, 1977.
Golledge, R. G., & Rushton, G. Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976.
Golledge, R. G., Rivizzigno, V. L., & Spector, A. Learning about a city: Analysis by M.D.S.In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 95–118.
Gould, P. Problems of space preference measures and relationships. Geographical Analysis, 1969, I, 31–44.
Gould, P., & White, R. Mental maps. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1974.
Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. Applied multidimensional scaling. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972.
Guttman, L, A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 469–506.
Guttman, R. The structuring of sociological spaces. Transactions of the Fourth World Congress of Sociology, 1961, 3, 315–355.
Harman, E. J., and J. F. Betak, Some preliminary findings on the cognitive meaning of external privacy in housing.In Honikman, Basil (Ed.), Proceedings, E.D.R.A. 5 (#11), 1974. Pp. 41–56.
Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
HaiTison, J., & Sarre, P. Personal construct theory in the measurement of environmental images, I: Problem.s and methods. Environment and Behavior, 1971, 3, 351–374.
Harrison, J., & Sarre, P. Personal construct theory and the measurement of environmental images; II: Applications. Environment and Behavior, 1974, 6, 3–58.
Honikman, B. Personal construct theory and environmental evaluation. In W. F. E. Preiser (Ed.), Environmental design research. Vol. 1. Stroudsburg, Pa. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1973. Pp. 242–253.
Honikman, B. Personal construct theory and environmental meaning: Applications to urban design. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 88–98.
Horton, F. E., & Reynolds, D. R. Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behavior. Economic Geography, 1971, 47(4), 36–48.
Hudson, R, Images of the retailing environment: An example of the use of the repertory grid methodology. Environment and Behavior, 1974, 6, 470–494.
Indow, T., & Uchizono, T. Multidimensional mapping of Munsell colors varying in hue and chroma. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 59, 321–329.
Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 241–254.
Kendall, M. G. Further contributions to the theory of paired comparisons. Biometrics, 1955 11 43–62.
Kelly, G. A. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York, W. W. Norton, 1955.
Klemmer, E. T., & Shrimpton, N. W. Preference scaling via a modification of Shepard’s proximity analysis method. Human Factors, 1963, 5, 163–168.
Knight, R. L., & Menchik, M. D. Conjoint preference estimation for residential land use policy evaluations. In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.) Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio University Press, 1976. Pp. 135–156.
Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrika, 1964a, 29, 1–27.
Kruskal, J. B. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychome- trika, 1964b, 29, 115–129.
Kruskal, J. B. Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data. The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B, methodological), 1965, 27, 251–263.
Kruskal, J. B. Linear transformation of multivariate data to reveal clustering. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972. Pp. 181–193.
Kruskal, J., Young, K., & Seery, J. How to use KYST, a Very Flexible Program to do Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding, Unpublished ms. Murray Hill, N.J.: Bell Laboratories, (undated).
Lingoes, J. C. New computer developments in pattern analysis and nonmetric techniques. In Proceedings, I.B.M. symposium: Computers in psychological research. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1966.
Lingoes, J. C. An IBM 7090 program for Guttman-Lingoes conjoint measurement, I. Behavioral Science 1967, 12, 501–502.
Louviere, J. J. Information processing theory and functional form in spatial behavior. In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 211–248.
Lueck, V. Cognitive and affective components of residential preferences for cities: A pilot study. In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 273–302.
Lycan, R. An analysis of migrant’s distance and preference spaces in Canada, 1949–1968. Paper read at annual meeting. Western Regional Science Association, San Diego, February 1970.
Lynch, K. The image of the city. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1960.
Lynch, K. Foreword. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. v-viii.
McCallum, R. C. Relations between factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81(8), 505–516.
McGee, V. The multidimensional analysis of “elastic” distances. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966, 19, 181–196.
Messick, S. J. An empirical evaluation of multidimensional successive intervals. Psy- chometrika, 1956, 21, 367–376.
Moore, G. T. Spatial relations ability and developmental levels of urban cognitive mapping.Man-Environment Systems, 1975, 5, 247–248.
Moore, G. T. Theory and research in the development of environmental knowing. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 137–164.
Moore, G. T., & Golledge, R. G. Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976.
Napior, D. Nonmetric multidimensional techniques for summated ratings. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972. Pp. 158–180.
Olivier, D. Metric for comparison of multidimensional scalings. Unpublished ms., 1970.
Oostendorp, A., & Berlyne, D. E. Dimensions in the perception of architecture (unpublished manuscript). Department of Psychology, University of Toronto (no date).
Peay, E. R. Nonmetric grouping: Clusters and cliques, Psychometrika, 1975, 40(3), 297–313.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1956.
Rivizzigno, V. L. Brief explanations and apphcations of KYST. TORSCA-9, HICLUST, INDSCAL and CONGRU using control group data. In R. G. Golledge (Ed.), Cognitive configurations of a city. Vol. 1. Columbus: Ohio State University Research Foundation and Department of Geography, 1975.
Rivizzigno, V. L. Cognitive representations of an urban area. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Geography, Ohio State Univerisity, Columbus, 1976.
Rushton, G. Preferences and choice in different environments. Proceedings, 1971, Association of American Geographers, 3, 146–149.
Schwind, P. J. Spatial preferences of migrants for regions: The example of Maine, Proceedings, Association of American Geographers, 1971, 3, 150–156.
Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, I. Psychometrika, 1962a, 27, 125–140.
Shepard, R. N. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function, II. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 219–246.
Shepard, R. N. Metric structures in ordinal data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966, 3, 287–315.
Shepard, R. N. Introduction to Volume 1. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972. Pp. 1–19.
Shepard, R. N. Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects. Psychometrika, 1974, 39, 373–421.
Shepard, R. N., & Carroll, J. D. Parametric representation of nonlinear data structure. Multivariate Analysis, 1966, A.F. 33 (615). 3016.
Shepard, R. N., & Kruskal, J. Nonmetric methods for scaling and factor analysis. American Psychologist, 1964, 19, 557–558 (abstract).
Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K., & Nerlove, S. B. Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972 (2 vols.).
Siegel, S. Non-parametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
Slater, P. The analysis of personal preference. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1960,13, 119–135.
Slater, P. Notes on INGRID, 67. London: Biometrics Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, 1967.
Slater, P. The principal components of a repertory grid. Privately published under a grant from the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom, 1969a.
Slater, P. Theory and technique of the repertory grid. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1969b, 115, 1287–1296.
Sneath, P. H. A. Evaluation of clustering methods. In A. J. Cole (Ed.), Numerical Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
Sokal, R., & Sneath, P. H. A. Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman, 1963.
Spence, L, & Domoney, D. Single subject incomplete designs for nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 1974, 39, 469–490.
Spector, A. An analysis of variations in the representations of cognitive images of an urban environment. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Geography, Ohio State University, 1977.
Takane, Y., Young, F., & de Leeuw, T. How to use ALSCAL. Unpublished ms. Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1976.
Thurstone, L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 1927, 34, 273–286.
Tobler, W. The geometry of mental maps. In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1976. Pp. 69–82.
Torgerson, W.S. Multidimensional scaling, I: Theory and methods. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 401–419.
Tryon, R. C., & Bailey, D. E. The B.C. Try computer system of cluster and factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 1966, 95–111.
Tucker, L. R. Relations between multidimensional scaling and three-mode factor analysis.Psychometrika, 1972, 37, 3–27.
Tucker, L. R., & Messick, S. An individual difference model for multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 333–367.
Tversky, A. A general theory of polynomial conjoint measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1967, 4, 1–20.
Ward, J. H., Jr. Hierarchical groupings to optimize an objective function.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1963,58, 236–244.
Wish, M. Notes on the variety, appropriateness, and choice of proximity measures. Unpublished paper. Bell Laboratory Workshop on M.D.S., Murray Hill, N.J., 1972.
Wish, M., Deutsch, M., & Biener, L. Differences in perceived similarity of nations. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, & S. B. Nerlove, (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. Vol. 2. New York: Seminar Press, 1972.
Wohlwill, J. Searching for the environment in environmental cognition research: A commentary on research strategy. In G. T. Moore & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Environmental knowing. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1976. Pp. 385–392.
Young, F. W. A model for polynomial conjoint analysis algorithms. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney, S. B. Nerlove (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1972a. Pp. 69–102.
Young, F. W. POLYCON users manual. Report 104. Chapel Hill, N.C.: L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Labs., 1972b.
Young, F. W. An asymmetric Euclidean model.for multi-process asymmetric data. Paper prepared for U.S.-Japan seminar on Theory, Methods and Applications of M.D.S. and Related Techniques, San Diego, 1975.
Young, F. W., & Torgerson, W. S. TORSCA: A Fortram IV program for Shepard-Kruskal M.D.S. analysis. Behavioral Science, 1967, 12, 498.
Young, G., & Householder, A. S. Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances. Psychometrika, 1938, 3, 19–22.
Zannaras, G. An analysis of cognitive and objective characteristics of the city: Their influence on movements to the city center. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Geography, Ohio state University, Columbus, 1973.
Zeller, R., & Rivizzigno, V. L. Mapping cognitive structure of urban areas with M.D.S.: A prehminary report. Columbus, Ohio State University, Department of Geography Discussion Paper 42, 1974
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Golledge, R.G. (1977). Multidimensional Analysis in the Study of Environmental Behavior and Environmental Design. In: Altman, I., Wohlwill, J.F. (eds) Human Behavior and Environment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0808-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0808-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0810-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0808-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive