Advertisement

Tele-existence (I): Design and Evaluation of a Visual Display with Sensation of Presence

  • S. Tachi
  • K. Tanie
  • K. Komoriya
  • M. Kaneko

Summary

The tele-existence system is a teleoperator system that enables a human operator at the controls to perform remote manipulation tasks dexterously with the feeling that s/he exists in the slave anthropomorphic robot in the remote environment. The Mechanical Engineering Laboratory has started an 8-year national project of advanced robotics to realize this tele-existence system. In this paper the project goal is described first. Next, the visual display system that measures the operator’s head movement, controls the slave robot’s vision system according to the movement, and displays the acquired two visual images to both the operator’s eyes through head-mounted CRT displays, whose images in turn fuse to give the visual sensation (which is very natural), when designed and constructed. Evaluation of the system has been carried out by measuring the metric of binocular visual space of a human operator with or without the display device. The experiment reveals that the metric of the binocular visual space viewed with the naked eye can be reserved in tele-existence system by servoing the focal length of the display lenses and the angle of the convergence of the two CRTs appropriately.

Keywords

Visual Space Convergence Angle Remote Environment Slave Robot Robot Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Johnsen E G & Corliss W R (1967) Teleoperators and Human Augmentation NASA SP 5047Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Orton A (1971) A system for stereo viewing. Computer Journal, 14 (2), 140–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Sutherland I E (1968) A Head-mounted Three Dimensional Display Fall Joint Computer Conf., 757–764Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Köhler G W (1978) Status of Remote Systems Technology Proc. 8th Int. Symp. On Industrial Robots, 805–828Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Charles J & Vertut J (1977) Cable controlled deep submergence teleoperator system. J. Mech. Mach. Theory, 12, 481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Hightower J D & Smith D C (1983) Teleoperator Technology Development 12th Meeting of UJNR/MFP, 43–47Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Julesz B (1971) Foundations of Cyclopean Perception University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Tachi S et al (1981) Guide Dog Robot — Feasibility Experiments with MELDOG MARK III Proc. 11th Int. Symp. on Industrial Robots, 95–102Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Tachi S & Komoriya K (1982) The 3rd generation robot. J. Soc. Instrument Control Eng. 21,1140–1146Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Luneburg R K (1950) The metric of binocular visual space. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 40 (10), 627–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Helmholtz H V Treatise on Psychological Optics vol. 3, ed.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Zajaczkowska A (1956) Experimental test of Luneburg’s theory. Horopter and alley experiments. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 46 (7), 514–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RoManSy and contributors 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Tachi
    • 1
  • K. Tanie
    • 1
  • K. Komoriya
    • 1
  • M. Kaneko
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering LaboratoryMITI Tsukuba Science CityIbaraki, 305Japan

Personalised recommendations