Skip to main content
  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

Stuttering is routinely described as a difficulty in saying words or sounds. Although stuttering obviously does involve sounds and words, characterizing the disorder in either of these terms misleads in opposite directions. Stuttering is most appropriately identified as a syllabic phenomenon, an intra-syllabic event—essentially because it is expressed at the level of the syllable. The denouement of the analyses presented in Chapter 5 was the isolation of syllable-initial position and linguistic stress as the focal “language factors” associated with stuttering. Syllable-initial position and linguistic stress are syllabic phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Footnotes

  1. These, and other, important distinctions between consonants and vowels will be incorporated in the discussion in Chapter 9_.

    Google Scholar 

  2. One implication of coarticulation is that, contrary to long-standing belief, stutters cannot be associated with phones as invariant entities because phones are produced as part of a sequence. Evidently this is particularly true of syllable-initial phones—which are the phones that are involved in stutters.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Even though, holistically, the initial consonant(s) have a perceptually and psychologically real independent identity.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For instance, MacKay used “initial consonant group” and “vocalic group.”

    Google Scholar 

  5. The following terms have been used to specify sequential parts of Hockett’s “all that follows:” peak or vowel nucleus; coda or final consonant (or cluster); and appendix or inflectional suffix. See MacKay (1972); Halle and Vergnaud (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Justifiable on, among other grounds, the fact of the frequency with which monosyllabic words occur in ordinary discourse.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, for example, Fromkin (1973b, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hockett’s example: “Let us flee, said the fly, so they flew through the flaw in the flue.”

    Google Scholar 

  9. Partly different, yet evidently partially duplicating.

    Google Scholar 

  10. This characterization of a “fault line” is borrowed from the field of geology where it refers to a crack in the earth’s crust, not always evident at the surface, that penetrates deep into the underlying structure.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Marcel E. Wingate

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wingate, M.E. (1988). The Fault Line. In: The Structure of Stuttering. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9664-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9664-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9666-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9664-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics