Abstract
The basic mathematical assumptions underlying classical general relativity and its physical interpretation are reviewed. Those structural features which arise from the non-existence of an a priori, given spacetime metric and associated isometry group are stressed, and it is emphasized that general relativity is not just a Poincare-invariant theory with a complicated gauge group. Then the fundamental assumptions on which special-relativistic quantum field theories have been based are considered and compared with general relativity from a mathematical and physical point of view. Two (old fashioned?) types of attempts to “quantize gravity” are then briefly discussed: (i) perturbation theory starting with linearized, free Einstein gravity, and (ii) canonical quantization starting from the ADM-dynamics. This is done only to illustrate difficulties which arise in “quantizing” gravity and to explain to quantum field theorists the point of view of at least one classically oriented relativist with the aim of improving communication and mutual understanding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosenblum, A. (1990). On the Relation between General Relativity and Quantum Theory: Difficulties as Seen by a Non-Expert. In: Rosenblum, A. (eds) Relativity, Supersymmetry, and Strings. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9504-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9504-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9506-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9504-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive