Abstract
The two conventional Hamiltonians of quantum electrodynamics, namely, the minimal-coupling (P⃗·A⃗) and the multipolar (µ⃗·E⃗) Hamiltonians are known to yield the same rates of resonance transitions (absorption or emission) for stationary atoms. These two Hamiltonians, related by the Power-Zienau canonical transformation, are shown to produce identical rates for moving dipoles, in the nonrelativistic limit (v/c≪l) only if the magnetic moment associated with the moving dipole is included in the multipolar interaction. The effect of the motion is then, regardless of the chosen Hamiltonian, a reduction of the dipole-field coupling constant by a factor of 1-v⃗ q̂/c, where q̂ is the unit vector in the direction of the emitted or absorbed radiation. In the case of dipoles associated with relativistic spin −1/2 particles (e.g. electrons or positrons channeled in crystals), the coupling constant obtained from the Dirac Hamiltonian differs from that of the nonrelativistic limit by a factor of 2γ/(γ+1), where γ=(1-v2/c2)−1/2. The wave equation and generalized N-particle Bloch equations are written in terms of electric-field and polarization operators of the active modes, with the motionally-reduced field-dipole coupling constants, thus providing the framework for the analysis of spontaneous emission, superfluorescence and lasing from ensembles of fast-moving dipoles. The first-order perturbative result for the γ-dependence of gain obtainable by single-mode field stimulation of channeling radiation from relativistic electrons is retrieved from this analysis in the small — T2, steady-state, small-signal regime. Substantial modifications of this γ-dependence are predicted in other regimes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. U. Andersen and E. Bonderup, in “Annual Review of Nuclear Particle Science”, J. B. Jackson, H, E. Gove and R. Y. Schwitters, eds. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto (1983).
V. V. Beloshitsky and F. F. Komarov, Phys. Rep. 93:117 (1982).
E. A. Power “Introductory Quantum Electrodynamics”, Longmans, London (1964).
W. P. Healy “Nonrelativistic Quantum Electrodynamics”, Academic Press, London and New York (1982).
B. U. Felderhof and D. Adu-Gyamfi, Physica 71:399 (1974).
W. P. Healy, J. Phys. A 10:279 (1977).
The limitations of this picture are discussed by G. Kurizki and J.K. McIver, in Phys. Rev. B 32:4358 (1985), where a unified quantal treatment of all types of radiation from fast particles in crystals is presented.
M. S. Feld and J. C. MacGillivray, in “Coherent Nonlinear Optics”, M. S. Feld and V. S. Letokhov, eds., Springer, Berlin (1981).
H. Haken “Laser Theory”, Springer, Berlin (1983).
V. V. Beloshitskii and M. A. Kumakhov, Sov. Phys. JETP 47:652 (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kurizki, G., Strauss, M., Oreg, J., Ben-Reuven, A. (1986). Electromagnetic Field Interaction with Fast-Moving Dipoles. In: Prior, Y., Ben-Reuven, A., Rosenbluh, M. (eds) Methods of Laser Spectroscopy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9459-8_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9459-8_45
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9461-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9459-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive