Advertisement

Photoreceptors pp 159-175 | Cite as

Recovery from Light-Desensitization in Toad Rods

  • L. Cervetto
  • V. Torre
  • E. Pasino
  • P. Marroni
  • M. Capovilla
Part of the NATO Asi Series book series (NSSA, volume 75)

Abstract

The visual system of vertebrates possesses a remarkable property whereby a fairly good discrimination of light changes occurs over a wide range of ambient intensities (about 8 log units). Much of this adaptability is attributed to the existance within the same retina of two receptor types (rods and cones) with distinct functional properties and sensitivities (see Gouras, 1972).

Keywords

Dark Adaptation Voltage Response Repetitive Stimulation Background Illumination Test Flash 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bastian, B.L. & Fain, G.L. (1979). Light adaptation in toad rods: requirement for an internal messenger which is not calcium. J. Physiol. 297, 493–520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baylor, D.A. & Fuortes, M.G.F. (1970). Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle. J. Physiol. 207, 77–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baylor, D.A. & Hodgkin, A.L. (1974). Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors. J. Physiol. 242, 729–758.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baylor, D.A., Hodgkin, A.L. & Lamb, T.D. (1974 a). The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J. Physiol. 242, 685–727.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baylor, D.A., Hodgkin, A.L. & Lamb, T.D. (1974 b). Reconstruction of electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light. J. Physiol. 242, 759–791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boynton, R.M. & Whitten, D.N. (1970). Visual adaptation in monkey cones: recordings of late receptor potentials. Science, 170, 1423–1426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capovilla, M., Cervetto, L. & Torre, V. (1980). Effects of changing external potassium and chloride concentrations on photoresponses of Bufo bufo rods. J. Physiol. 307, 529–551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Capovilla, M., Cervetto, L., Pasino, E. & Torre, V. (1981). The sodium current underlying the responses to light of toad rods. J. Physiol. 317, 223–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cervetto, L., Pasino, E. & Torre, V. (1977). Electrical responses of rods in the retina of Bufo marinus. J. Physiol. 267, 17–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Coles, J.A. & Yamane, S. (1975). Effects of adapting lights on the time course of the receptor potential of the anuran retinal rod. J. Physiol. 247, 189–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cone, R.A. (1973). The internal transmitter model for visual excitation: some quantitative inqjlications, in: “Biochemistry and Physiology of Visual Pigments”, ed. Langer, H. pp. 275–282. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Copenhagen, D.R. & Owen, W.G. (1976). Functional characteristics of lateral interaction between rods in the retina of the snapping turtle. J. Physiol. 259, 251–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Donner, K.O. & Hemila, S. (1978). Excitation and adaptation in the vertebrate rod photoreceptors. Medical Biology, 56, 52–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fain, G.L. (1976). Sensitivity of toad rods: dependence on wavelength and background illumination. J. Physiol., 261, 71–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fain, G.L., Quandt, F.N., Bastian, B.L. & Gerschenfeld, H.M. (1978). Contribution of a cesium sensitive conductance increase in the rod photoresponse. Nature, Lond. 272, 467–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuortes, M.G.F. & Hodgkin, A.L. (1964). Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia of Limulus. J. Physiol. 172, 239–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldstein, E.B. & Williams, T.P. (1966). Calculated effects of “screening pigments”. Vision Res. 6, 39–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gouras, P. (1972). Light and dark adaptation, Handbook of Sensory physiology, vol. VII/2, Physiology of Photoreceptor Organs ed. Fuortes, M.G.F., pp. 610–634. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Grabowski, S.R. & Pak, W.L. (1975). Intracellular recordings of rod responses during dark-adaptation. J. Physiol. 247, 363–391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleinschmidt, J. & Dowling, J.E. (1975). Intracellular recordings from gecko photoreceptors during light and dark adaptation. J. Physiol. 66, 617–648.Google Scholar
  21. Lamb, T.D., Maughton, P.A. & Yau, K.-W. (1981). Spatial spread of activation and background desensitization in rod outer segments. J. Physiol. 319, 463–496.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liebman, P.A. & Entine, G. (1968). Visual pigments of frog and tadpole (Rana pipiens). Vision Res. 8, 761–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Normann, R.A. & Perlman, I. (1979). The effects of background illumination on the photoresponses of red and green cones. Physiol. 286, 491–507.Google Scholar
  24. Normann, R.A. & Werblin, F.S. (1974). Control of retinal sensitivity: I. Light and dark adaptation of vertebrate rods and cones. J. gen. Physiol. 63, 37–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Owen, W.G. & Sillman, A.J. (1973). The suppression-recovery effect in the frog photoreceptor. Vision Res. 13, 2591–2594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwartz, E.A. (1975). Cone excite rods in the retina of the turtle. J. Physiol. 246, 639–651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Werblin, F.S. (1971). Adaptation in a vertebrate retina: intracellular recording in Necturus. J. Neurophysiol. 34, 228–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Cervetto
    • 1
  • V. Torre
    • 1
  • E. Pasino
    • 1
  • P. Marroni
    • 1
  • M. Capovilla
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Neurofisiologia del C.N.R., Pisa, Istituto di Anatomia e Istologia Veterinaria, PisaIstituto di Scienze FisicheGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations