Methods for Analyzing the Contributions of C3 and C3 CM to Military Force Capabilities



The objective of the work that is presented here is to develop methods for the assessment of C3 and C3CM in terms of military operational parameters. The assessment clearly cannot be independent of the force structures and applications of those forces and must be directed toward specific equipments and planned operational uses. The methods to be used are to be based on techniques that have been demonstrated to be workable and on data inputs that are obtainable.


Command Post Mission Success Command Staff Constant Quest Blue Flag 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Joint Tactical Communications Office, Cost Effectiveness Program Plan for Joint Tactical Communications, Vol. II, System Effectiveness, April 1974 (Unclassified).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    USAF Tactical Air Forces Interoperability Group, CONSTANT QUEST, Phase 1, Final Report, June 1979 (Unclassified). Supporting volumes: Operational Methodology Group, Exercise Methodology Group, and Modeling Group.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robert L. Brandenburg, The Warfare Environment Simulator (WES), Naval Ocean Systems Center (presented at the CORS-TIMS-ORSA), May 1981 (Unclassified).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Department of the Army, U.S. Army TRADOC Systems Analysis Agency, Command, Control, Communications, and Combat Effectiveness Model Documentation, Vol. I, Design Report, Vol. II, Technical Report, TRASANA Technical Memorandum 3-78, October 1978 (Unclassified).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    General Research Corporation for USAF Studies and Analyses, TAC ASSESSOR Methodology Manual and TAC ASSESSOR Programmers Manual, CR-2-792 and CR-3-792, October 1979 (Unclassified).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Defense AnalysesAlexandriaUSA
  2. 2.Joint Chiefs of Staff/C3 SystemsEvaluation GroupPentagonUSA

Personalised recommendations