Semiotic Phenomenology and Peirce

  • Patrick Sullivan


In assessing Ricour’s approach to the “science of language,” Bourgeois (1971:122) presents the conditions that must be met in order to justify Semiotic Phenomenology as a theoretical framework for the study of language. He asserts that,

Semiology places this condition on phenomenology: that phenomenology be able to account for a theory of structures, for the system or semiological model, i.e., for a theory of construction and relation of signs. But phenomenology places a condition on semiology: that it adequately account for meaning.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boon, J. A., 1979, Saussure/Peirce a propos Language, Society, and Culture, Semiotica, 29: 83–101.Google Scholar
  2. Bourgeois, P. L., 1971, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Language, Research in Phenomenology, 1: 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Culler, J., 1976, “Ferdinand de Saussure”, Penguin Books, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Deledalle, G., and Rhéthoré, J., 1979, “Theorie et Pratique du Signe”, Payot, Paris.Google Scholar
  5. De Saussure, F., 1966, “Course in General Linguistics,” W. Baskin, trans., C. Bally and A. Sechehaya with A. Riedlinger, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Eco, U., 1976, “A Theory of Semiotics,” Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  7. Fitzgerald, J., 1966, “Peirce’s Theory of Signs as Foundation for Pragmatism,” Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  8. Freeman, E., 1934, “The Categories of Charles Peirce,” The Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Hardwick, C. S., with the assistance of J. Cook, 1977, “Semiotics and Signifies, The Correspondence Between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady.Welby,” Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  10. Holenstein, E., 1976, “Roman Jakobson’s Approach to Language, Phenomenological Structuralism,” Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  11. Lanigan, R. L., 1979a, A semiotic metatheory of human communication, Semiotica. 27 /4: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lanigan, R.L., 1979b, Communication models in philosophy: review and commentary, in: “Communication Yearbook III,” D. Nimmo, ed., Transaction Books, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  13. Peirce, C.S., 1934, 1958, “Collected Papers,” C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A.W. Burks, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Peirce, C.S., 1976, “The New Elements of Mathematics,” C. Eisele, ed., Mouton, The Hague; Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands.Google Scholar
  15. Ransdell, J., 1978, A misunderstanding of Peirce’s phenomenology, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 /14: 550–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Savan, D., 1952, On the origins of Peirce’s phenomenology in: “Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce,” P.P. Weiner and F.H. Young, eds., Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.DentonUSA

Personalised recommendations