Skip to main content

Talent and Technique in Theatre: A Semiotics of Performing

  • Chapter
Semiotics 1981
  • 371 Accesses

Abstract

The ability to perform in theatre depends upon a certain vitality or movement as well as the distinct articulation or delimiting of that movement. The way movement is limited in theatre is a question of a pattern or style that correlates the limits of movement according to a precise logic. In this paper, I consider both an analog and a digital logic of performing. First, I describe the analog logic of performing as talent, where talent defines a bodily capability for performing that everyone shares, though not all to the same degree. Second, I describe the digital logic of performing as technique that defines a bodily ability which can be developed as a craft which an individual either possesses or not. In a final section, I interpret the relation of bodily capability and ability in the embodiment of a meaningful gesture. Talent and technique suggest a semiotics of performing that patterns bodily capability and ability in the living gesture of theatre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Eco, U., 1976, “A Theory of Semiotics,” Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielgud, J., 1939, “Early Stages,” Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gielgud, J., 1963, “Stage Directions,” Random, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotowski, J., 1968, “Towards a Poor Theatre,” Simon and Shuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, R. L., 1979, A Semiotic Metatheory of Human Communication, Semiotica 27, 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M., 1962, “Phenomenology of Perception,” C. Smith, trans., Routledge and Kegan-Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M., 1964, “The Primacy of Perception,” J. M. Edie, ed., Northwestern University Press, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolin, U., 1963, “Improvisation for Theatre,” Northwestern University Press, Evanston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talma, F. J., 1825, “Reflections on the Actor’s Art,” Also in (1970) “Actors on Acting,” T. Cole and H. K. Chinoy, eds., 180–187, Crown, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peterson, E.E. (1983). Talent and Technique in Theatre: A Semiotics of Performing. In: Deely, J.N., Lenhart, M.D. (eds) Semiotics 1981. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9328-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9328-7_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9330-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9328-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics