Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

Despite laws in every state mandating universal free instruction for children entering public school, millions of students who require special education have been excluded from the programs they need. Although formal special education classes began almost eighty years ago, they were often of little value to their intended beneficiaries. Classified as “feebleminded,” “imbeciles,” or worse, mentally and physically handicapped children were segregated in rooms apart from the rest of the school population, received inferior educational services, and were very often institutionalized. Other such children were denied access to educational programs entirely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 347 U.S. 483 (1954) and extensive discussion cited therein.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Id. at 493.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F. Supp. 1257 (F.D. Pa. 1971) and 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa. 1972). The testimony of Dr. I. Ignacy Goldberg detailing the history and requirements of special education programs is especially relevant here.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 22 Pennsylvania Code, Chapter 13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Catherine D. v. Pittenger, Civil No. 74-2435 (E.D. Pa., Order, June 27, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 419 F. Supp. 960 (E.D. Pa. 1976), aff’d, 557 F.2d 374 (3rd Cir. 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Examples of early litigation brought to define and develop the rights of children include Fial-kowski v. Shapp, 405 F. Supp. 946 (E.D. Pa. 1973); Panitch v. Wisconsin, 371 F. Supp. 935 (E.D. Wis. 1974); Harrison v. Michigan, 350 F. Supp. 846 (E.D. Mich. 1972); Lebanks v. Spears, 60 F.R.D. 135 (E.D. La. 1973); Maryland Association for Retarded Children v. Maryland, Equity No. 100-182-77676 (Cir. Ct. 1974). For additional early cases see The Right of Handicapped Children to an Education: The Phoenix of Rodriguez, 59 CORNELL L. REV. 519 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401, et seq.; 34 C.F.R. Part 300.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Section 504 is cited as 20 U.S.C. § 794; for its implementing regulations see 34 C.F.R. Part 104 (formerly 45 C.F.R. Part 84). Title IX is 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq.,—for regulations see 34 C.F.R. Part 106; Title VI is 42 U.S.C. § 2000(d).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 20 U.S.C. § § 3311 et seq. See Central York School District v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 349 A.2d 167 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1979); see also Irwin v. McHenry Community Consolidated School District, as cited in Education Daily, May 4, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goldberg, S.S. (1982). Introduction. In: Special Education Law. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9245-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9245-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9247-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9245-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics