The Relevance of Atomic Processes to Magnetic Confinement and the Concept of a Tokamak Reactor

  • M. F. A. Harrison


The origins of research into controlled nuclear fusion may possibly be traced to the discovery of deuterium, whose existence was postulated (albeit on the basis of incorrect measurements) by Birge and Menzel in 1931, and to the discovery by Oliphant, Harteck and Rutherford in 1934 that new isotopes, T and He3, were produced in disintegration experiments involving D-D reactions. The possibility of using nuclear fusion as a source of energy was explored in many laboratories but the first statement regarding the scale of research into its controlled application appeared in 1958 in the form of concurrent publication in Nature1 of several papers describing the US and UK programmes. This was shortly followed by publication of comparable work in the USSR. The world-wide effort now amounts to over 3000 scientists and engineers but so complex are the scientific and technological problems that it is still not possible to predict with absolute certainty the route that will eventually lead to an economic and reliable fusion reactor.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Nature, 181 (1958).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Glasstone and R.H. Lovberg, Controlled Thermonuclear Reactions (D. van Nostrand Co.Inc., New York, 1960).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.J. Rose and M. Clark, Plasmas and Controlled Fusion (The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1961)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.O. Hagler, M. Kristiansen, An Introduction to Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion (Lexington Books, Lexington, 1977).Google Scholar
  5. Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research in 1978 (Proc. 7th Conf. Innsbruck, 1978) IAEA, Vienna (1979).Google Scholar
  6. Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics (Proc.8th Europ. Conf., Prague, 1977).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lectures from Culham Plasma Physics Summer School, 1978 ed. J.J. Field and P. Reynolds (in course of publication). See also Plasma Physics, Lectures from the Culham Plasma Physics Summer School ed. B.E. Keen (Institute of Physics, Conf.Ser.No.20, 1974).Google Scholar
  8. Physics Reports (Section C of Physics Letters) 37 1978, “Atomic and Molecular Data for Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion” invited papers at IAEA Advisory Meeting, Culham, November 1976.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.W. Drawin, Journal de Physique, Suppl.2, 40, Cl–73 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.W. Drawin, in “Plasma Physics 1978, Lectures given at the IXth Summer School on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, Dubrovnik, 1978, ed. R.K. Janer.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.P. Summers and R.W.P. McWhirter, J.Phys.B: Atom. & Molec. Phys., 12, 2387 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atomic Data for Controlled Fusion Research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 0RNL-5206 and 5207 (1977) ed. C.F. Barnett.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F.L. Ribe, Rev.Mod.Phys., 47, 7, 1975.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fusion Reactor Design Concepts (Proc.Tech.Comm. Meeting and Workshop, Madison 1979) IAEA, Vienna (1978).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Eubank et al. (P.L.T. Group), 7th Int.Conf. on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Innsbruck (1978) Paper IAEA-CN-37-C-3.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.D. Lawson, Proc.Phys.Soc. (London) 106A, Suppl.2, 173 (1959).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A Fusion Reactor Power Plant(Princeton University Plasma Physics Laboratory Report MATT-1050, August 1974) ed. R.G. Mills.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.W. Conn, Proc. 3rd Int.Conf. on Plasma Surface Interactions, Culham 1978, p.103.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    I.E. Tamm, Plasma Physics and the Problem of Controlled Thermonuclear Reactions, M.A. Leontovich 1961 1, 35.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Status and Objectives of Tokamak Systems for Fusion Research, edited by a Review Panel, S.O. Dean et al., WASH-1295 UC-20 (1973).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.T.D. Mitchell, Am.Nucl.Soc. 3rd Topical Meeting on Technology of Controlled Nuclear Fusion, Santa Fe (1978) p.954.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Hancox and J.T.D. Mitchell, Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, Berchesgaden, 1976, III. IAEA, Vienna (1977) p.193.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Pfeiffer and R.E. Waltz, Nuclear Fusion, 19, 51 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Spitzer, Physics of Fully Ionized Gases (John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Spitzer and R. Harm, Phys.Rev. 89, 977 (1953).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D.R. Sweetman, Nucl.Fusion 13, 157 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    T.S. Green, 10th Symp. on Fusion Technology, Padova, Italy (1978).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    T.V. Goffe, M.B. Shah and H.B. Gilbody, J.Phys.B: Atom.Molec. Phys., in course of publication (1979).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Salop and R.E. Olson, Phys.Rev,A 16, 1811 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R.L. Freeman and E.M. Jones, Culham Laboratory Report CLM-R137 (1974).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    A.C. Riviere, Neutral Injection Heating of Toroidal Reactors, Appendix 3 (D.R. Sweetman ed.) Culham Laboratory Report CLM-R112 (1971).Google Scholar
  32. Proceedings of the Symp. on the Production and Neutralisation of Negative Hydrogen Ions and Beams, Brookhaven National Laboratory (1977) BNL 50727 (1977).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    R.W.P. McWhirter, Physics Reports (Section C of Physics Letts.) 37, 165 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 33a Atomic and Molecular Data for Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion, invited papers at IAEA Advisory Meeting, Culham, November 1976.Google Scholar
  35. Equipe TFR, Nuclear Fusion, 17, 1297 (1977).Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    C. Breton, C. de Michelis and M. Mattioli, Nuclear Fusion, 16, 891 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 36.
    J.B. Taylor, Proc. IAEA Workshop on Fusion Reactor Design Problems, Culham 1974. Nuclear Fusion Special Supplement (1974) p.403.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    R.W. Conn and J. Kesner, Proc. 2nd Conf. on Surface Effects in Controlled Fusion Devices, San Francisco (1976) p.I.Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    M.H. Hughes, private communication (1979).Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    R.V. Jenson, D.E. Post, W.H. Grasberger, C.B. Tarter and W.A. Lokke, Nuclear Fusion, 17, 1187 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. G.M. McCracken and P.E. Stott, Culham Laboratory Preprint CLM-P573 (to be published in Nuclear Fusion).Google Scholar
  42. Proc. 3rd Int.Conf. on Plasma Surface Interactions in Controlled Fusion Devices, Culham (1978).Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    M. Keilhacker, reprinted from Tokamak Reactors for Breakeven: A Critical Study of the Near-Term Fusion Reactor Programme. International School of Fusion Reactor Technology, Erice (1976) p.171.Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    P.E. Stott, C.M. Wilson and A. Gibson, Nuclear Fusion, 18, 475 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 44.
    A. Gibson and M.L. Watkins, Proc. of 8th Europ. Conf. on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Prague (1977) Vol.1, p.31.Google Scholar
  46. R.G. Montague, D.A. Hobbis and M.F.A. Harrison, to be published C1979).Google Scholar
  47. Proc. of the Fusion Fuelling Workshop, Princeton 1977, CONF-771129 (1978).Google Scholar
  48. Proc. 2nd Symp. on Ion Sources and Formation of Ion Beams, Berkeley (1974), LBL-3399 (1974).Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    Plasma Diagnostics, R.H. Huddleston and S.L. Leonard (Academic Press, New York, 1965).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. F. A. Harrison
    • 1
  1. 1.Culham LaboratoryUKAEA/Euratom Fusion AssociationAbingdonOxonUK

Personalised recommendations