Cell Interactions in the In Vitro Production of Antibodies to Chemically Defined Antigens

  • S. Segal
  • S. Kunin
  • A. Globerson
  • G. Shearer
  • M. Feldman
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 12)


Antibody production to a number of antigens appears to be determined by a bicellular interaction (1–5).. In mice each of the interacting cells seems to be of a different ontogenetic origin, manifesting distinct functional properties. With regard to RBC antigens one of the cooperating cells was shown to derive from the thymus, the other from the bone marrow. Although both seem to be capable of recognizing antigenic determinants of the immunogen, only the bone marrow cell can produce antibodies (6,7).. Such a bicellular mechanism was inferred also from experiments of the secondary response to hapten protein conjugates (8–11). Cells recognizing antigeneic determinants of the carrier molecule seem to interact with cells recognizing the hapten determinants, and capable of producing anti-hapten antibodies.


Bone Marrow Cell Irradiate Mouse Carrier Molecule Thymus Cell Carrier Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. J. S. Davies, Transpl. Rev. 1:43, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. F. A. P. Miller and G. F. Mitchell, Transpl. Rev. 1:3, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. N. Claman and E. E. Chaperon, Transpl. Rev. 1:92, 1969.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. B. Taylor, Transpl. Rev. 1:114, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Globerson and M. Feldman, in: Mononuclear Phagocytes. Blackwell Scientific Publications. In press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. J. S. Davies, E. Leuchars, V. Wallis, R. Marchant and E. V. Elliot, Transpl. 5:222, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. F. A. P. Miller and G. F. Mitchell, J. Exp. Med. 131:675, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. A. Mitchison, in: Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 32:431, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. Ovary and B. Benacerraf, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 114:72, 1963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. A. Mitchison, Prog. Bioph. and Mol. Biol. 16:3, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Rajewsky, V. Schirrmacher, S. Nase and N. K. Jerne, J. Exp. Med. 123:1311. 1969.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Globerson and R. Auerbach, J. Exp. Med. 124:1001, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Segal., A. Globerson, M. Feldman, J. Haimovich and M. Sela, J. Exp. Med. 131:93, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Haimovich and M. Sela, J. Immunol. 97:338, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. F. Schlossman and H. Levine, J. Immunol. 98:211, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Greenberg-Ramon, Studies on the cellular basis of immunological. tolerance. Ph. D. thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, 1969.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. A. Mitchison, Immunol. 15:509, 1968.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. M. Shearer and G. Cudkowicz, J. Exp. Med. 129:935, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. D. Barbour, C. Gross and A. Novick, J. Mol. Biol. 33:967, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Segal
    • 1
  • S. Kunin
    • 1
  • A. Globerson
    • 1
  • G. Shearer
    • 1
  • M. Feldman
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Cell Biology and Chemical ImmunologyThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations