Abstract
This paper will be concerned with compound-nucleus reactions that lead to residual nuclei excited into the continuum. Thus, not only will direct processes be ignored, but scant attention will be given to compound-nucleus reactions leading directly to discrete states of residual nuclei.
Work supported by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A.C. Douglas and M. MacDonald, Nucl. Phys. 13, 382 (1959).
T.D. Thomas, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci., 18, 343 (1968).
G. Ligett and D. Sperber, Phys. Rev. C3, 167 (1971).
R. Reedy, M. Fluss, G. Herzon, L. Kowalski, and J.M. Miller, Phys. Rev. 188, 1771 (1969).
J.R. Grover and J. Gilat, Phys. Rev. 157, 802 (1967).
I. Dostrovsky, Z. Fraenkel, and G. Friedlander, Phys. Rev., 116, 683 (1959).
S.N. Ghoshal, Phys. Rev.,80, 939 (1950).
F.S. Houck and J.M. Miller, Phys. Rev. 123, 231 (1961).
E.V. Verdieck and J.M. Miller, Phys. Rev. 153, 1253 (1967).
See, for example: Theodore J. Krieger, Ann. Rev. Phys. (N.Y.) 31, 88 (1965) and the references quoted therein.
Figure taken from E.G. Moorhead, Nuclear Reactions of 10–20 MeV Deuteron with 61-Nickel, Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University (1964).
J. Robb Grover and Richard J. Nagle, Phys. Rev. 134, B1248 (1964),
J.M. D’Auria and M.J. Fluss, G. Herzog, L. Kowalski, J.M. Miller, and R.C. Reedy, Phys. Rev., 174, 1409 (1968).
R.C. Reedy, M.J. Fluss, G.F. Herzog, L. Kowalski and J.M. Miller, Phys. Rev., 188, 1771 (1969).
Jacob Gilat and J. Robb Grover, Phys. Rev. C3, 734 (1971).
See for example: A.M. Lane and R.G. Thomas, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 344 (1958).
M.J. Fluss, J.M. Miller, J.M. D’Auria, N. Dudey, Bruce M., Foreman, Jr., L. Kowalski and R.C. Reedy, Phys. Rev., 187, 1449 (1969).
N. Dudey, M. Fluss, B. Foreman, L. Kowalski and J. Miller, International Nuclear Physics Conference, pp. 803–806, Academic Press, New York (1967).
Enhancement here is defined as σ(p, p′) σ(α,α’) /σ(p,α) σ(α,p′).
S.M. Grimes, J.D. Anderson, A.K. Kerman, and C. Wong, UCRL-72759 (1970).
C. C. Lu, J.R. Huizenga, C.J. Stephan, and A.J. Gorski, Nucl. Phys., A164, 225 (1971).
G. Jaffe and M. Fluss, personal communication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1972 Plenum Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miller, J.M. (1972). The Role of Angular Momentum and Isobaric Spin in Tests of the Independence Hypothesis. In: Garg, J.B. (eds) Statistical Properties of Nuclei. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8666-1_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8666-1_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-8668-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-8666-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive