Advertisement

Accelerated removal of pesticides from domestic animals

  • B. J. Liska
  • W. J. Stadelman
Conference paper
Part of the Residue Reviews book series (RERERU, volume 29)

Abstract

Domestic animals may be exposed to pesticides in a variety of ways. They may consume feed with residues present. These residues in or on feed are absorbed in the intestinal tract. Some of the residues are de-toxified and excreted in feces and urine. In the case of the chlorinated insecticides a portion of the residues are deposited in lipid tissues in the body. A second means of contamination is when animals are treated directly for control of pests with insecticides. If animals are present when spraying for pests is done in buildings or out in the open they may become contaminated by inhaling the spray material or having sprays come in contact with the skin. Another possible method of contamination is for animals to come in contact with surfaces which have been sprayed with chlorinated pesticides and absorb these residues through the skin.

Keywords

Pesticide Residue Chlorinate Pesticide Chlorinate Hydrocarbon Insecticide Ration Ration Ration Chlorinate Pesticide Residue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer, T. E., and D. G. Crosby: Annual progress report, Regional Research Project W-45, CSRA, U.S. Department of Agriculture (1967)Google Scholar
  2. Brown, W. H., J. M. Witt, F. M. Whiting, and J. W. Stull: Secretion of DDT in milk by fresh cows. Bull. Environ. Contamination and Toxicol. 1, 21 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Laben, R. C.: DDT contamination of feed and residues in milk. J. Animal Sei. (Inpress) (1968)Google Scholar
  4. —, T. E. Archer, D. G. Crosby, and S. A. Peoples: Milk contamination from low levels of DDT in dairy rations. J. Dairy Sei. 49, 1488 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Liska, B. J., G. C. Mostert, B. E. Langlois, and W. J. Stadelman: Problems resulting from the misuse of lindane for chigger control on turkey ranges as related to residue in edible tissues. J. Econ. Entomol. 57, 682 (1964 a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. —, B. E. Langlois, G. C. Mostert, and W. J. Stadelman: Residues in eggs and tissues of chickens on rations containing low levels of DDT. Poultry Sei. 43,982 (1964 b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marth, E. H.: Residues and some effects of chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides n biological material. Residue Reviews 9, 1 (1965)Google Scholar
  8. Miller, D. D.: Effects of thyroprotein and a low energy ration on removal of DDT from lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sei. 50, 1444 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stadelman, W. J.: Management practices for removal of residues from domestic animals. Proc. 25th Semi-annual Meeting Amer. Feed Manufacturers Assoc. Nutr. Council, p. 35 (1965)Google Scholar
  10. —, B. J. Liska, B. E. Langlois, G. C. Mostert, and A. R. Stemp: Persistenceof chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticide residues in chicken tissues and eggs. Poultry Sei. 44, 435 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Street, J. C.: Methods of removal of pesticide residues. J. Can. Med. Assoc. (In press) (1968)Google Scholar
  12. Stull, J. W., W. H. Brown, F. M. Whiting, and J. M. Witt: Variability of DDT in milk. J. Dairy Sei. 49, 945 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. — — — — An epidemiological study of pesticide contamination in milk on an operating dairy farm. Bull. Environ. Contamination and Toxicol. (In press) (1968 a)Google Scholar
  14. — — — L. M. Sullivan, Mary Milbrath, and J. M. Witt: Secretion of DDT by lactating cows fed thyroprotein. J. Dairy Sei. 51, 56 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vessey, D. A., L. S. Maynard, W. H. Brown, and J. W. Stull: The subcellular partition and metabolism of orally administered l,l,l-trichloro-2,2-bis(p- chlorophenyl) ethane by rat liver cells. Biochem. pharmacol. 17, 171 (1968)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Washington state poultry council: summer forced molting of hens for commercial egg production. poultry pointer no. 21, agr. extension bull. 323 (1947)Google Scholar
  17. Wesley, R. L., A. R. Stemp, B. J. Liska, and W. J. Stadelman: Depletion of DDT from commercial layers. Poultry Sei. 45, 321 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. — —,R. B. Harrington, B. J. Liska, R. L. Adams, and W. J. Stadelman: Further studies on depletion of DDT residues from laying hens. Poultry Sci. 47. In press (1969)Google Scholar
  19. Wilson, K. A., R. M. Cook, and R. S. Emery: Effects of charcoal feeding on dieldrin excretion in ruminants. Fed. Proc. 27, abstr. #1924 (1968)Google Scholar
  20. Witt, J. M., F. M. Whiting, W. H. Brown, and J. W. Stull: Contamination of milk from different routes of animal exposure to DDT. J. Dairy Sci. 49, 370 (1966 a)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. — — — Respiratory exposure of dairy animals to pesticides. Adv. Chem. Series 60, 99 (1966 b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. —, W. H. Brown, G. I. Shaw, L. S. Maynard, L. M. Sullivan, F. M. Whiting, and J. W. Stull: Rate of transfer of DDT from the blood compartment. Bull. Environ. Contamination Toxicol. 1, 187 (1966 c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. J. Liska
    • 1
  • W. J. Stadelman
    • 1
  1. 1.Food Sciences InstitutePurdue UniversityLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations