Advertisement

Insect chemosterilants: Their chemistry and application

  • Alexej B. Bořkovec
Conference paper
Part of the Residue Reviews / Rückstands-Berichte book series (RECT, volume 6)

Abstract

Sexual sterilization of insects by ionizing radiation and the practical application of this process to insect control have been adequately reviewed in the literature by Baumhover et al. (1955), Bushland and Hopkins (1951 and 1953), Knipling (1955, 1959, 1960 a, and 1960 b), and Lindquist (1955). It is sufficient here to mention briefly the principles and shortcomings of the radiation-sterilization method which provided the impetus to the search for chemosterilants and thus paved a way for this new and promising insect-control tool.

Keywords

Nitrogen Mustard Methanesulfonic Acid Carbamic Acid Folic Acid Antagonist Piperonyl Butoxide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, P.: Radiation-imitating chemicals. Scient. Amer. 202 (No. 1), 99 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, E., and W. Seaman: Method of assay for ethylenimine derivatives. Anal. Chem. 27, 540 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ascher, K. R. S.: Prevention of oviposition in the house fly through tarsal contact agents. Science 125, 938 (1957).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ascher, K. R. S., and I. Hirsch: Inhibition of oviposition in the house fly by ingestion of acaricides (ovicides). Riv. Malariol. 40, 139 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. Bardos, T. J.: Consideration of chemical reaction mechanisms in relationship to the biological action of “dual antagonists”. Biochem. Pharmacol. 11, 256 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumhover, A. H., A. J. Graham, B. A. Bitter, D. E. Hopkins, W. D. New, F. H. Dudley, and R. C. Bushland: Screw-worm control through release of sterilized flies. J. Econ. Entomol. 48, 462 (1955).Google Scholar
  7. Berenbaum, M. C., and M. Calley: Effect of anti-tumor agents on nondividing cells. Nature 196, 656 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesele, J. J.: Mitotic poisons and the cancer problem. New York: Elsevier 1958.Google Scholar
  9. Biesele, J. J.: Experimental and therapeutic modification of mitosis. Cancer Research 22, 779 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Block, M., And H. Jackson: The action of triethylenemelamine on the fertility of male rats. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 12, 1 (1957).Google Scholar
  11. Boone, I. U., B. S. Rogers, and D. L. Williams: Toxicity, metabolism, and tissue distribution of carbon-14-labeled N,N′,N″-triethylenethiophosphoramide (Thio-TEPA) in rats. Toxicol, appl. Pharmacol. 4, 344 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borkovec, A. B.: Sexual sterilization of insects by chemicals. Science 137, 1034 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borkovec, A. B., and C. W. Woods: Aziridine chemosterilants. Sulfur-containing aziridines. Adv. Chem. Series 41, 47 (1963).Google Scholar
  14. Bottini, A. T., and V. Dev: Structure-activity relationship of ethylenimines. II. Methyl-substituted derivatives of tetramin. J. Med. Pharm. Chem. 5 (No. 5), 925 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bushland, R. C., and D. E. Hopkins: Experiments with screw-worm flies sterilized by X-rays. J. Econ. Entomol. 44, 725 (1951).Google Scholar
  16. Bushland, R. C., and D. E. Hopkins: Sterilization of screw-worm flies by X-rays and gamma rays. J. Econ. Entomol. 46, 648 (1953).Google Scholar
  17. Carlson, E. A., and I. I. Oster: Chemical-mutagen induced mosaicism at the dumpy locus. Genetics 46, 856 (1961).Google Scholar
  18. Cattenach, B. M., and R. G. Edwards: The effects of triethylenemelamine on the fertility of male mice. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 67 B, 54 (1958).Google Scholar
  19. Chamberlain, W. F.: Chemical sterilization of the screw-worm. J. Econ. Entomol. 55, 240 (1962).Google Scholar
  20. Chamberlain, W. F., and D. E. Hopkins: Effect of colchicin on screw-worms. J. Econ. Entomol. 53, 1133 (1960).Google Scholar
  21. Clark, A. M.: Mutagenic activity of the alkaloid heliotrine in Drosophila. Nature 163 (No. 4663), 731 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark, A. M.: Sterilization of Drosophila by some pyrrolizidine alkaloids. 2. Vererbungsl. 91, 74 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Craig, A. W., and H. Jackson: The metabolism of 32-P-labeled triethylene-phosphoramide in relation to its anti-tumour activity. Brit. J. Parmacol. 10, 321 (1955).Google Scholar
  24. Cressman, A. W.: Response of citrus red mite to chemical sterilants. J. Econ. Entomol. 56, 111 (1963).Google Scholar
  25. Davis, D. E.: Gross effects of triethylenemelamine on gonads of starlings. Anat. Record 142 (No. 3), 353 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Epstein, J., R. W. Rosenthal, and R. J. Ess: Use of 7-(4-nitrobenzyl) pyridine as analytical reagent for ethylenimines and alkylating agents. Anal. Chem. 27, 1435 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fahmy, O. G., and M. J. Fahmy: Cytogenetic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors in Drosophila melanogaster. II. The mechanism of induction of dominant lethals by 2,4,6-tri(ethylenimine)-l,3,5-triazine. Genetics 52, 603 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fahmy, O. G., and M. J. Fahmy: Cytogenetic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors in Drosophila melanogaster. VI. The mutagenic cell-stage response of the male germ line to the nitrogen mustard derivatives of amino acids, carboxylic acids, and amines. Genetic Research 1, 173 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fahmy, O. G., and M. J. Fahmy: Cytogenetic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors in Drosophila melanogaster. XI. Mutagenic efficiency of the methyloxy esters on the sperm in relation to molecular structure. Genetics 46, 1111 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Feldmesser, J., M. Beroza, and R. V. Rebois: Effect of chemosterilants on saprophytic nematodes. J. Parasit. 48 (No. 2), 44 (1962).Google Scholar
  31. Fox, B. W., H. Jackson, A. W. Craig, and T. D. Glover: Effects of alkylating agents on spermatogenesis in the rabbit. J. Reprod. Fertil. 5, 13 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldacre, R. J., A. Loveless, and W. C. J. Ross: Mode of production of chromosome abnormalities by the nitrogen mustards: The possible role of cross-linking. Nature 163, 667 (1949).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldsmith, E. D.: Anti-metabolites as larvicidal and sterility agents in the insect. Proc. 64th Ann. Meeting Amer. Assoc. Econ. Entomol. Dec. 1952.Google Scholar
  34. Goldsmith, E. D., and I. Frank: Sterility in the female fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, produced by the feeding of a folic acid antagonist. Amer. J. Physiol. 171 (No. 3), 726 (1952).Google Scholar
  35. Goldsmith, E. D., M. H. Harnly, and E. B. Tobias: Folic acid analogs in lower animals. I. The insecta: Drosophila melanogaster. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 52, 1342 (1950).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goldsmith, E. D., E. B. Tobias, and M. H. Harnly: Folic acid antagonists and the development of Drosophila melanogaster. Anat. Rec. 101, 93 (1948).Google Scholar
  37. Golumbic, C., J. S. Fruton, and M. Bergmann: Chemical reactions of the nitrogen mustard gases. I. The transformations of methyl-bis(ß-chloroethyl)amine in water. J. Org. Chem. 11, 518 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, S. A.: Trends in insect control agents. J. Washington Acad. Sci. 52 (No. 2), 29 (1962).Google Scholar
  39. Harries, F. H.: Effect of certain antibiotics and other compounds on the two-spotted spider mite. J. Econ. Entomol. 54, 122 (1961).Google Scholar
  40. Harris, R. L.: Chemical induction of sterility in the stable fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 55, 882 (1962).Google Scholar
  41. Ihndris, R. W.: Synonyms of cancer chemotherapy agents. Cancer Chemother. Rep. 15, 67 (1961).Google Scholar
  42. Ihndris, R. W.: Synonyms of cancer chemotherapy agents. Appendix I. NSC numbers. Cancer Chemother. Rep. 18, 129 (1962).Google Scholar
  43. Jackson, H.: Antifertility substances. Pharmacol. Rev. 11, 135 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Jackson, H., B. W. Fox, and A. W. Craig: The effect of alkylating agents on male rat fertility. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 14, 149 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jackson, H., B. W. Fox, and A. W. Craig: Antifertility substances and their assessment in the male rodent. J. Reprod. Fertil. 2, 447 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jacobson, M., and W. A. Jones: Insect sex attractants. II. The synthesis of a highly potent gypsy moth sex attractant and some related compounds. J. Org. Chem. 27, 2523 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Joechle, W.: Biology and biochemistry of reproduction and contraception. Angew. Chem., Internat. ed. 1, 537 (1962).Google Scholar
  48. Kilgore, W. W., and R. R. Painter: The effect of 5-fluorouracil on the viability of house fly eggs. J. Econ. Entomol. 55, 710 (1962).Google Scholar
  49. Knipling, E. F.: Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J. Econ. Entomol. 48, 459 (1955).Google Scholar
  50. Knipling, E. F.: Sterile male method of population control. Science 130, 902 (1959).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Knipling, E. F.: Use of insects for their own destruction. J. Econ. Entomol. 53, 415 (1960 a).Google Scholar
  52. Knipling, E. F.: The eradication of the screw-worm fly. Scient. Amer. 203 (No. 4), 54 (1960 b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Knipling, E. F.: Potentialities and progress in the development of chemosterilants for insect control. J. Econ. Entomol. 55, 782 (1962).Google Scholar
  54. Labreque, G. C.: Studies with three alkylating agents as house fly sterilants. J. Econ. Entomol. 54, 684 (1961).Google Scholar
  55. Labreque, G. C., P. H. Adcock, and C. N. Smith: Tests with compounds affecting house fly metabolism. J. Econ. Entomol. 53, 803 (1960).Google Scholar
  56. Labreque, G. C., D. W. Meifert, and R. L. Fye: A field study on the control of house flies with diemosterilant techniques. J. Econ. Entomol. 56, 150 (1963 a).Google Scholar
  57. Labreque, G. C., D. W. Meifert, and H. K. Gouck: Effectiveness of three 2-methylaziridine derivatives as house fly diemosterilants. Florida Entomol. 46, 7 (1963 b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Labreque, G. C., and C. N. Smith: Mating competitiveness of chemosterilized and normal house flies. Science 136, 388 (1962 a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Labreque, G. C., C. N. Smith, and D. W. Meifert: A field experiment in the control of house flies with chemosterilant baits. J. Econ. Entomol. 55, 449 (1962 b).Google Scholar
  60. Lindquist, A. W.: The use of gamma radiation for control or eradication of the screw-worm. J. Econ. Entomol. 48, 467 (1955).Google Scholar
  61. Lindquist, A. W.: Chemicals to sterilize insects. J. Washington Acad. Sci. 109 Nov. 1961.Google Scholar
  62. Loebbecke, E. A., and R. C. Von Borstel: Mutational response of Habrobracon oocytes in metaphase and prophase to ethyl methanesulfonate and nitrogen mustard. Genetics 47, 853 (1962).Google Scholar
  63. Mitlin, N.: Inhibition of development in the house fly by 3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl compounds. J. Econ. Entomol. 49, 683 (1956).Google Scholar
  64. Mitlin, N., and A. M. Baroody: Use of the house fly as a screening agent for tumor-inhibiting agents. Cancer Res. 18, 708 (1958 a).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Mitlin, N., and A. M. Baroody: The effect of some biologically active compounds on growth of house fly ovaries. J. Econ. Entomol. 51, 384 (1958 b).Google Scholar
  66. Mitlin, N., B. A. Butt, and T. J. Shortino: Effect of mitotic poisons on house fly oviposition. Physiol. Zool. 30, 133 (1957).Google Scholar
  67. Montgomery, J. A.: The relation of anticancer activity to chemical structure. Cancer Res. 19, 447 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Morgan, P. B., and G. C. Labreque: The effect of apholate on the ovarian development of house flies. J. Econ. Entomol. 55, 626 (1962).Google Scholar
  69. Mukherjee, M. C.: Sterility in Drosophila melanogaster consequent on using a mammalian oral contraceptive. Science and Culture 27, 497 (1961).Google Scholar
  70. Nadkarni, M. V., E. G. Trams, and P. K. Smith: Preliminary studies on the distributions and fate of TEM, TEPA, and myleran in the human. Cancer Res. 19, 713 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Ogsten, A. G., E. R. Holiday, J. St. L. Philpot, and L. A. Stocken: Trans. Faraday Soc. 44, 45 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Piquett, P. G., and J. C. Keller: A screening method for diemosterilants of the house fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 55, 261 (1962).Google Scholar
  73. Plapp, F. W., Jr., W. S. Bigley, G. A. Chapman, and G. W. Eddy: Metabolism of metaphoxide in mosquitoes, house flies, and mice. J. Econ. Entomol. 55, 607 (1962).Google Scholar
  74. Purdom, C. E.: Mutagenic effects of nitrogen mustard derivatives of azobenzene compounds in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem. Pharmacol. 5, 206 (1960).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rapoport, I. A.: Derivatives of carbamic acid and mutations. Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med. 23, 198 (1947).Google Scholar
  76. Roehrborn, G.: Mutagenitatsuntersuchungen mit l,4-Dimethylsulfonoxy-l,4-dimethylbutan an Drosophila melanogaster. 2. Vererbungsl. 90, 457 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roehrborn, G.: Chemische Konstitution und mutagene Wirkung. Klassifizierungsversuch chemischer Mutagene. Experientia 16, 523 (1960).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Roehrborn, G.: Chemische Konstitution und mutagene Wirkung. II. Triazinderivate. 2. Vererbungsl. 93, 1 (1962).Google Scholar
  79. Ross, W. C. J.: The reactions of certain epoxides in aqueous solutions. J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 2257.Google Scholar
  80. Ross, W. C. J.: Biological alkylating agents. London: Butterworths 1962.Google Scholar
  81. Shaw, J. G., and M. S. Riviello: Sterility in the Mexican fruit fly caused by chemicals. Science 137, 754 (1962 a).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shaw, J. G., and M. S. Riviello: Investigaciones sobre empleo de productos quimicos como esterilizantes sexuales para la mosca de la fruta. Ciencia 22 (No. 1–2), 17 (1962 b).Google Scholar
  83. Stacey, K. A., M. Cobb, S. F. Cousens, and P. Alexander: Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 68, 682 (1958).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Steinberger, E.: A quantitative study of the effect of an alkylating agent (triethylenemelamine) on the seminiferous epithelium of rats. J. Reprod. Fertil. 3, 250 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Steinberger, E., W. O. Nelson, A. Boccabella, and W. J. Dixon: The radiomimetic effect of triethylenemelamine on reproduction in the male rat. Endocrinol. 65, 40 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tenhet, J. N.: Effect of pyrethrum on oviposition of the cigarette beetle. J. Econ. Entomol. 40, 910 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Vandenbergh, J. G., and D. E. Davis: Gametocidal effects of triethylenemelamine on a breeding population of redwinged blackbirds. J. Wildlife Management 26, 366 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weidhaas, D. E.: Chemical sterilization of mosquitoes. Nature 195, 786 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Weidhaas, D. E., H. R. Ford, J. B. Gahan, and C. N. Smith: Preliminary observations on the chemosterilization of mosquitoes. Proc. N. J. Mosq. Extermin. Assoc. 48, 106 (1961).Google Scholar
  90. Whitelock, O. V. St.: Comparative clinical and biological effects of alkylating agents. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 68, 657 (1958).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag OHG · Berlin · Göttingen · Heidelberg 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexej B. Bořkovec
    • 1
  1. 1.Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research ServiceU. S. Department of AgricultureBeltsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations