Recent developments in the detection and determination of pesticides and their residues by oscillographic polarography

Conference paper
Part of the Residue Reviews / Rückstands-Berichte book series (RECT, volume 6)


Although polarography is being used advantageously in many fields of science, its utilization for the detection and determination of pesticide and fungicide residues has been limited. However, recent developments in polarographic instrumentation and techniques have generated renewed interest in the polarography of these materials. An excellent review of the application of polarography to pesticide and fungicide residues has already been presented in “Residue Reviews” by Martens and Nangniot (1963).


Methyl Parathion Drop Mercury Electrode Polarographic Determination Fungicide Residue Thiuram Disulfide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Airey, L.: The application of the cathode ray oscillograph to polarography: General layout and uses of the cathode ray polarograph. Analyst 72, 304 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, J. A. R.: Polarographic determination of azinphos-methyl residues in certain crops. Analyst 87, 786 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowen, C. V., and F. I. Edwards: Polarographic determination of O-p-Nitrophenyl Thiophosphate (Parathion). Anal. Chem. 22, 706 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brezina, M., and P. Zuman: Polarography in medicine, biochemistry, and pharmacy. (Translated by S. Wawzonek.) New York-London: Interscience 1958.Google Scholar
  5. Condliffe, W. F., and A. J. H. Skrimshire: Polarographic determination of copper, lead, tin, and zinc in foodstuffs. J. Polarogr. Soc. 7, 10 (1961).Google Scholar
  6. Davidek, J., and G. Janicek: Polarographic determination of DDT. Experienta 17, 473 (1961).Google Scholar
  7. Delahay, P.: An experimental study of the characteristic features of oscillographic polarography. J. Phys. Colloid Chem. 53, 1279 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gajan, R. J.: Application of oscillographic polarography to the determination of organic phosphorous pesticide residues. J. Assoc. Official Agr. Chemists 45, 401 (1962).Google Scholar
  9. Gajan, R. J.: Application of oscillographic polarography to the determination of organic phosphorous pesticide residues. II. A rapid screening procedure for the determination of parathion in some fruits and vegetables. Publication pending (1963).Google Scholar
  10. Getz, M. E.: Six phosphate pesticide residues in green leafy vegetables: Cleanup method and paper chromatographic identification. J. Assoc. Official Agr. Chemists 45, 393 (1962).Google Scholar
  11. Hasegawa, K.: Polarographic differentiation of ethyl parathion, methyl parathion, and EPN. Kagaku Keisata Kenkgusho Hokoku 15, 62 (1962); Chem. Abstr. 57, 6360 a (1962).Google Scholar
  12. Heyrovsky, J.: The development of polarographic analysis. Analyst 81, 189 (1956A).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heyrovsky, J.: Trends in polarographic analysis. Chemical Age 74, 1449 (1956 b).Google Scholar
  14. Heyrovsky, J.: Anwendung des Kathodenstrahloszillographen in der Polarographie mit Wechselstrom. Chem. Technol. 9, 257 (1957).Google Scholar
  15. Heyrovsky, J., and J. Forejt: Oszillographische Polarographie. 2. Phys. Chem. 193, 77 (1943).Google Scholar
  16. Israel, Y.: Rapid polarographic determination of low concentrations of mercuric ion. Anal. Chem. 31, 1473 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jedlicka, V., and A. Pasek: Pesticides in food. V. Determination of hydrocyanic acid in food products by oscillographic polarography. Ceschol Farn. 8, 138 (1959); Anal. Abstr. 6, 4968 (1959).Google Scholar
  18. Jedlicka, V., and A. Pasek: Oscillographic determination of contaminating substances in foodstuffs. Chem. Zvesti 14, 757 (1960); Anal. Abstr. 8, 3027 (1961).Google Scholar
  19. Kolthoff, I. M., and J. J. Lingane: Polarography. 2 Vol., 2nd ed. New York-London: Interscience 1952.Google Scholar
  20. Kalvoda, R.: Anwendung der oszillographischen Polarographie in der quantitativen Analyse. XI. Oszillographie des Schwefels. Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun. 21, 825 (1956).Google Scholar
  21. Kemula, W., and A. Krzenminska: Chromato polarographic investigations. XIV. Separation and determination of DDT isomers. Chem. Anal. 5, 611 (1960); Chem. Abstr. 57, 8960 h (1962).Google Scholar
  22. Klein, A. K., and R. J. Gajan: Determination of pentachloronitrobenzene in vegetables. J. Assoc. Official Agr. Chemists 44, 712 (1961).Google Scholar
  23. Loveland, J. W., and P. J. Elving: Cathode ray oscilloscope investigation of phenomena at polarizable mercury electrodes. Chem. Reviews 51, 67 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martens, P. H., and P. Nangniot: La determination de résidus d’insecticides et de fongicides par la méthode polarographique. Residue Reviews 2, 26 (1963).Google Scholar
  25. Matheson, L. A., and N. Nicols: The cathode ray oscillograph applied to the dropping mercury electrode. Tans. Electrochem. Soc. 73, 193 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meites, L.: Polarographic techniques. New York-London: Interscience 1955.Google Scholar
  27. Milner, G. W. C.: The principals and applications of polarography. London-New York-Toronto: Longmans 1957.Google Scholar
  28. Müller, R. H., R. L. Garman, M. E. Droz, and J. Petras: The cathode ray polarograph. Ind. Eng. Chem., Anal. ed. 10, 339 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nangniot, P.: La polarographie appliquée au dosage de petites doses d’insecticides et de fongicides. I. Le soufre élémentaire. Bull. Inst. Agron. Stat. Rech. (Gembloux) 28, 276 (1960 a).Google Scholar
  30. Nangniot, P.: Possibilités de dosage de traces de TMTD par la voie polarographique. Mededeel. Landbouwhogeschool Opzoekst. (Gent) 25, 1285 (1960 b).Google Scholar
  31. Nangniot, P.: La polarographie appliquée au dosage de petites doses d’insecticides et de fongicides. II. Le dérivés de l’acide dithiocarbamique. 1. Le ziram, 2. le ferbam, 3. Le zineb. Bull. Inst. Agron. Stat. Rech. (Gembloux) 28, 365 (1960 c).Google Scholar
  32. Randles, J. E. B.: The application of the cathode ray oscillograph to polarography: Underlying principals. Analyst 72, 301 (1947).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Reynolds, G. F., and H. M. Davis: An improved Randies type cathode ray polarograph. Analyst 78, 314 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Romazanovich, N. P., and K. G. Berezina: Polarographic analysis of certain analogs of DDT. Zavod Lab. 27, 1453 (1961); Anal. Abstr. 9, 2957 (1962).Google Scholar
  35. Sevcek, A.: Oscillographic polarography using periodical triangular voltage. Coll. Czech. Chem. Comm. 13, 349 (1948).Google Scholar
  36. Shapiro, L. M.: Polarographic properties of some organophosphorous compounds. Toksikol i Farmakol. Yadokhim primenyaemykh v Sel’sk. Zdravookr. khoz. Minskii. Gas. Med. Inst. i. Naucha Issled. Lab. Min. Zdrarookhr Beloorussk. USSR 95 (1961); Chem. Abstr. 57, 4467 b (1962).Google Scholar
  37. Sirois, J.: The simultaneous determination by polarography of copper, zinc, and manganese in plant materials. Analyst 87, 900 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snowden, F. C., and H. T. Page: A cathode ray polarograph. Anal. Chem. 22, 969 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sohr, H.: Das oszillopolarographische Verhalten einiger organischer Phosphorverbindungen. Chem. Zvesti. 16, 316 (1962).Google Scholar
  40. Webster, J. C., and J. A. Dawson: A polarographic method for the determination of tetrachloronitrobenzene residues on potatoes. Analyst 77, 203 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weissberger, A.: Physical methods of organic chemistry. 3rd Ed., vol. I, part 4. New York-London: Interscience 1960.Google Scholar
  42. Yamano, H., T. Matsumura, and K. Fukuda: Polarographic identification of insecticides. Kagaku Keisata Kenkyusho Hokolu 15, 65 (1962); Chem. Abstr. 57, 6360 b (1962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag OHG · Berlin · Göttingen · Heidelberg 1964

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of FoodFood and Drug Administration, Department of Health, Education, and WelfareUSA

Personalised recommendations