Abstract
Light plays many roles in the lives of organisms other than that which we normally associate with the visual perception of patterns in the environment. Therefore, it is useful to distinguish between those situations in which (1) light is important to organisms primarily because of its energy content and (2) light functions as a signal, stimulus, or “trigger” and, from a biological viewpoint, energetic considerations are secondary.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. M. Williams and P. L. Adkisson, Physiology of insect diapause. XIV. An endocrine mechanism for the photoperiodic control of pupal diapause in the oak silkworm Antherea pernyi, Biol. Bull. 127, 511–525 (1964).
J. W. Truman and L. M. Riddiford, Neuroendocrine control of ecdysis in silkmoths, Science 67, 1624–1626 (1970).
J. W. Truman, Extraretinal photoreception in insects, Photobiology 23, 215–225 (1976).
J. L. Larimer, D. L. Trevino, and E. A. Ashby, A comparison of the spectral sensitivities of caudal photoreceptors of epigeal and cavernicolous crayfish, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 19, 409–415 (1966).
T. L. Page and J. L. Larimer, Extraretinal photoreception in entrainment of crustacean circadian rhythms, Photochem. Photobiol. 23, 245–251 (1976).
G. D. Block and D. G. McMahon, Cellular analysis of the Bulla ocular circadian pacemaker system III. Localization of the circadian pacemaker, J. Comp. Physiol. 155A, 387–395 (1984).
M. Zweig, S. H. Snyder, and J. Axelrod, Evidence for a nonretinal pathway of light to the pineal gland of newborn rats, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 56, 515–520 (1966).
J. S. Takahashi, H. Hamm, and M. Menaker, Circadian rhythms of melatonin release from individual superfused chicken pineal glands in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 2319–2322 (1980).
M. Menaker and S. Wisner, Temperature-compensated circadian clock in the pineal of Anolis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 6119–6121 (1983).
R. M. Eakin, The Third Eye, University of California Press, Berkeley (1973).
H. G. Hartwig and H. Oksche, Neurobiological aspects of extraretinal photoreceptive systems: Structure and function, Experientia 38, 991–996 (1982).
H. Meissl and S. R. George, Electrophysiological studies on neuronal transmission in the frog’s photosen-sory pineal organ, Vision Res. 24, 1727–1734 (1984).
T. Deguchi, Rhodopsin-like photosensitivity of isolated chicken pineal gland, Nature 290, 702–704 (1981).
R. G. Foster and B. K. Follett, The involvement of a rhodopsin-like photopigment in the photoperiodic response of the Japanese quail, J. Comp. Physiol. A 157, 519–528 (1985).
M. Menaker, Nonvisual light reception, Sci. Am. 226, 22–29 (1972).
M. Menaker, Extraretinal light perception in the sparrow. I. Entrainment of the biological clock, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 59, 414–421 (1968).
J. P. McMillan, H. C. Keatts, and M. Menaker, On the role of eyes and brain photoreceptors in the sparrow: Entrainment to light cycles, J. Comp. Physiol. 102, 251–256 (1975).
J. P. McMillan, J. A. Elliott, and M. Menaker, On the role of eyes and brain photoreceptors in the sparrow: Aschoff’s rule, J. Comp. Physiol. 102, 257–262 (1975).
S. Binkley, Constant light: Effects on the circadian locomotion rhythm of the house sparrow, Physiol. Zool. 3, 170–181 (1977).
J. P. McMillan, J. A. Elliott, and M. Menaker, On the role of eyes and brain photoreceptors in the sparrow: Arrhythmicity in constant light, J. Comp. Physiol. 102, 263–268 (1975).
H. Underwood and M. Menaker, Extraretinal photoreception in lizards, Photochem. Photobiol. 23, 227–243 (1976).
M. Menaker and H. C. Keatts, Extraretinal light perception in the sparrow. H. Photoperiodic stimulation of testis growth, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 60, 146–151 (1968).
H. Underwood and M. Menaker, Photoperiodically significant photoreception in sparrows: Is the retina involved? Science 167, 298–301 (1970).
M. Menaker, R. Roberts, J. A. Elliott, and H. Underwood, Extraretinal light perception in the sparrow. III. The eyes do not participate in photoperiodic photoreception, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 67, 320–325 (1970).
J. P. McMillan, H. Underwood, J. A. Elliott, M. H. Stetson, and M. Menaker, Extraretinal light perception in the sparrow. IV. Further evidence that the eyes do not participate in photoperiodic photoreception, J. Comp. Physiol. 97, 205–213 (1975).
M. B. Heaton and M. S. Harth, Non-visual light responsiveness in the pigeon: Developmental and comparative considerations, J. Exp. Zool. 188, 251–264 (1974).
R. J. Nelson and T. Zucker, Absence of extraocular photoreception in diurnal and nocturnal rodents exposed to direct sunlight, Comp. Biochem. Physio. 69A, 145–148 (1981).
J. S. Takahashi, P. J. DeCoursey, L. Bauman, and M. Menaker, Spectral sensitivity of a novel photoreceptive system mediating entrainment of mammalian circadian rhythms, Nature 308, 186–188 (1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Menaker, M. (1989). Extraretinal Photoreception. In: Smith, K.C. (eds) The Science of Photobiology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8061-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8061-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-43059-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-8061-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive