Skip to main content
View expanded cover

Sensory Evaluation of Food pp 173–207Cite as

Measurement of Sensory Thresholds

  • Chapter

Abstract

One of the earliest characteristics of human sensory function to be measured was the absolute threshold. The absolute or detection threshold was seen as an energy level below which no sensation would be produced by a stimulus and above which a sensation would reach consciousness. The concept of threshold was central to Fechner’s psychophysics. His integration of Weber’s law to produce the first psychophysical relationship (S = k log I) in fact depends formally on the physical intensity, I, being measured with the absolute threshold as the unit (Boring, 1946). Early physiologists like Weber and Fechner used the classical method of limits to measure this point of discontinuity or beginning of the psychophysical function. In the method of limits, the energy or physical intensity level would be raised and lowered, and the average point at which the observer changed response from “no sensation” to “yes, I perceive something” would be taken as the threshold. This specification of the minimum energy level required for perception was one of the first operating characteristics of sensory function to be quantified. Historically, the other common property to be measured was the difference threshold or minimal increase in energy needed to produce a noticeable increase in sensation. Together, these two measures were used to specify the psychophysical function, which to Fechner was a process of adding difference thresholds once the absolute threshold had been passed.

Keywords

  • Sensory Evaluation
  • Psychometric Function
  • Sensory Threshold
  • Absolute Threshold
  • Psychophysical Function

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

A light may be so weak as not sensibly to dispel the darkness, a sound so low as not to be heard, a contact so faint that we fail to notice it. In other words, a finite amount of the outward stimulus is required to produce any sensation of its presence at all. This is called by Fechner the law of the threshold— something must be stepped over before the object can gain entrance to the mind. — William James, 1913, p. 16

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-7843-7_6
  • Chapter length: 35 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4615-7843-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acree, T. E. 1993. Bioassays for flavor. In T. E. Acree and R. Teranishi, eds. Flavor Science, Sensible Principles and Techniques. American Chemical Society Books, Washington, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acree, T. E., Barnard, J., and Cunningham, D. G. 1984. A procedure for the sensory analysis for gas chromatographic effluents. Food Chemistry, 14, 273–286.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amerine, M. A., Pangborn, R. M., and Roessler, E. B. 1965. Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Spice Trade Association. 1968. Pungency of capsicum spices and oleoresins. American Spice Trade Association Official Analytical Methods, 21. 0, 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, J. E. 1971. Olfactory genetics and anosmia. In L. M. Beidler, ed. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Springer, Berlin, pp. 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, J. E. 1979. Directions for preparing aqueous solutions of primary odorants to diagnose eight types of specific anosmia. Chemical Senses and Flavor, 4, 153–161.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, J. E., Venstrom, D., and Davis, A. R. 1968. Measurement of specific anosmia. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 143–164.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antinone, M. A., Lawless, H. T., Ledford, R. A., and Johnston, M. 1994. The importance of diacetyl as a flavor component in full fat cottage cheese. Journal of Food Science, 59, 38–42.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM. 1978. Compilation of Odor and Taste Threshold Values Data. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM. 1991a. Standard practice for determination of odor and taste threshold by a forced-choice method of limits. E-679–79. In Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 15. 07. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM. 1991b. Standard practice for defining and calculating individual and group sensory threshold from forced-chioce data sets of intermediate size. E1432–91. In Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 15. 07. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayya, N., and Lawless, H. T. 1992. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of high-in-tensity sweeteners and sweetener mixtures. Chemical Senses, 17, 245–259.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M. 1987. Psychophysics of taste. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 31, 1068–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoshuk, L. M., Murphy, C., and Cleveland, C. T. 1978. Sweet taste of dilute NaCl: psychophysi-cal evidence for a sweet stimulus. Physiology and Behavior, 21, 609–613.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, B., and Högman, L. 1992. Reliability and validity of odor measurements near the detection threshold. Chemical Senses, 17, 823–824.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, A. F. 1932. Genetics of sensory thresholds: taste for phenylthiocarbamide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 18, 120–130.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brennand, C. P., Ha, J. K., and Lindsay, R. C. 1989. Aroma properties and thresholds of some branched chain and other minor volatile fatty acids occurring in milk-fat and meat lipids. Journal of Sensory Studies, 4, 105–120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. 1942. Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. G. W., Clapperton, J. F., Meilgaard, M. C., and Moll, M. 1978. Flavor thresholds of added substances. American Society of Brewing Chemists Journal, 36, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, W. S. 1976. Olfaction and the common chemical sense: some psychophysical contrasts. Sensory Processes, 1, 57–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, W. S. and Murphy, C. L. 1980. Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odor and irritation. Nature, 284, 255–257.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cornsweet, T. M. 1962. The staircase method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 485–491.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D. G., Acree, T. E., Barnard, J., Butts, R. M. and Braell, P. A. 1986. CHARM analysis of apple volatiles. Food Chemistry, 19, 137–147.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day, E. A., Lillard, D. A., and Montgomery, M. W. 1963. Autoxidation of milk lipids. III. Effect on flavor of the additive interactions of carbonyl compounds at subthreshold concentrations. Journal of Dairy Science, 46, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen, T. E. 1960. Effects of practice and instruction on olfactory thresholds. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 10, 195–198.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, D. M. 1993. The power of sensory discrimination methods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 8, 353–370.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Finney, D. J. 1971. Pro bit analysis, 3d ed. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, J. E. R. 1978. A critical analysis of the odour unit number and its use. Chemical Senses and Flavour, 3, 227–233.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gillette, M., Appel, C. E., and Lego, M. C. 1984. A new method for sensory evaluation of red pepper heat. Journal of Food Science, 49, 1028–1033.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. G. 1989. Capsaicin sensitization and desensitization on the tongue produced by brief exposures to a low concentration. Neuroscience Letters, 107, 173–178.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V. S. 1987. Capsicum-production, technology, chemistry and quality. Part III. Chemistry of the color, aroma and pungency stimuli. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 24, 245–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, H., and Grosch, W. 1994. Identification of the character impact odorants of stewed beef juice by instrumental analysis and sensory studies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 42, 2862–2866.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. O. 1986. Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 18, 623–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. 1913. Psychology. Henry Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesteadt, W. 1980. An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 28 (1), 85–88.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H. T. 1980. A comparison of different methods used to assess sensitivity to the taste of phenylthiocarbamide PTC. Chemical Senses, 5, 247–256.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H. T., Antinone, M. J., Ledford, R. A., and Johnston, M. 1994. Olfactory responsive-ness to diacetyl. Journal of Sensory Studies, 9 (1), 47–56.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H. T., Rozin, P., and Shenker, J. 1985. Effects of oral capsaicin on gustatory, olfactory and irritant sensations and flavor identification in humans who regularly or rarely consumer chili pepper. Chemical Senses, 10, 579–589.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H. T., Thomas, C. J. C., and Johnston, M. 1995. Variation in odor thresholds for 1-carvone and cineole and correlations with suprathreshold intensity ratings. Chemical Senses, 20, 9–17.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linschoten, M. R., Harvey, L. O., Eller, P. A., and Jafek, B. W. 1996. Rapid and accurate measurement of taste and smell thresholds using an adaptive maximum-likelihood staircase procedure. Chemical Senses, 21, 633–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl, D. S., Lukes, B. K., McDaniel, M. R., and Henderson, L. A. 1986. A semi-ascending paired difference method for determining the threshold of added substances to background media. Journal of Sensory Studies, 1, 291–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Masuoka, S., Hatjopolous, D., and O’Mahony, M. 1995. Beer bitterness detection: testing Thurstonian and sequential sensitivity analysis models for triad and tetrad methods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 10, 295–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, A. B., Acree, T. E., and Barnard, J. 1988. Variation in odor detection thresholds determined by charm analysis. Chemical Senses, 13, 435–444.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, A. B., Acree, T. E., and Barnard, J., Barnard, J., Darlington, R. B., and Aeree, T. E. 1991. Sensory thresholds: estimation from dose-response curves. Journal of Sensory Studies, 6 (4), 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBurney, D. H., and Collings, V. B. 1977. Introduction to Sensation and Perception. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. V., and Carr, B. T. 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 2d ed. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mela, D. 1989. Bitter taste intensity: the effect of tastant and thiourea taster status. Chemical Senses, 14, 131–135.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milo, C., and Grosch, W. 1993. Changes in the odorants of boiled trout ( Salmo fario) as affected by the storage of the raw material. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 41, 2076–2081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., Quiflonez, C., and Nordin, S. 1995. Reliability and validity of electrogustometry and its application to young and elderly persons. Chemical Senses, 20 (5), 499–515.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, M. 1986. Sensory adaptation. Journal of Sensory Studies, 1, 237–257.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, M. and Ishii, R. 1986. Umami taste concept: implications for the dogma of four basic tastes. In Y. Kawamura and M. R. Kare, eds., Umami: A Basic Taste. Dekker, New York, pp. 75–93..

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, M. and Odbert, N. 1985. A comparison of sensory difference testing procedures: sequential sensitivity analysis and aspects of taste adaptation. Journal of Food Science, 50, 1055–1060.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pangborn, R. M. 1981. A critical review of threshold, intensity and descriptive analy-ses in flavor research. In Flavor 81. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piggott, J. R. 1990. Relating sensory and chemical data to understand flavor. Journal of Sensory Studies, 4, 261–272.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Punter, P. H. 1983. Measurement of human olfactory thresholds for several groups of structurally related compounds. Chemical Senses, 7, 215–235.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M. D., and Cain, W. S. 1986. Determinants of measured olfactory sensitivity. Perception and Psychophysics, 39 (4), 281–286.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. R., Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V., Marino, S., and Price, R. A. 1995. Propylthiouracil tasting: determination of underlying threshold distributions using maximum likelihood. Chemical Senses, 20, 529–533.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schieberle, P., and Grosch, W. 1988. Identification of potent flavor compounds formed in an aqueous lemon oil/citric acid emulsion. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 36, 797–800.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. A. and O’Connell, R. J. 1991. Individual differences in threshold and quality reports of subjects to various odors. Chemical Senses, 16, 57–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. A. and O’Connell, R. J. 1995. Enhanced sensitivity to adrostenone following regular expo-sure to pemenone. Chemical Senses, 20, 413–419.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. C., Cain, W. S., and Burke, R. J. 1988. Variability of olfactory thresholds. Chemical Senses, 13, 643–653.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P. H., Bensinger, M. G., and Biftu, T. 1977. Determination of pungency due to capsicum by gas-liquid chromatography. Journal of Food Science, 42, 660–665.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherill, G. B., and Levitt, H. 1965. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18 (1), 1–10.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cornell University, USA

    Harry T. Lawless

  2. University of Missouri, USA

    Hildegarde Heymann

Authors
  1. Harry T. Lawless
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hildegarde Heymann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawless, H.T., Heymann, H. (1999). Measurement of Sensory Thresholds. In: Sensory Evaluation of Food. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7843-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7843-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-7845-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-7843-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive