Skip to main content

Elm Improvement Via Biotechnological Methods

  • Chapter
Book cover Dutch Elm Disease Research

Abstract

Rapid progress has been made over the past two decades in in vitro culture and manipulation of forest tree tissues, cells and protoplasts. It is now possible to micropropagate elms from many different types of cells and tissues; cryogenically preserve rare or unusual elm genotypes; isolate, culture and obtain whole trees from elm protoplasts and produce somatic elm hybrids via protoplast fusion. This paper will provide an overview of the significant advances in elm in vitro culture and will speculate as to how the rapidly evolving genetic engineering technologies will be used in genetic improvement for elms. Over the next decade, we envision significant biotechnological progress in: 1) determining the targets and receptors for the fungus-host responses in Dutch elm disease via in vitro disease challenge studies, 2) isolating molecular mechanisms for resistance to Dutch elm disease, and 3) introducing Dutch elm disease-resistant genes into ornamentally desirable but disease-susceptible elms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Benfey, P.N. and N.-H. Chua. 1990. The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter: Combinatorial regulation of transcription in plants. Science 250:959–966.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bob, C.F., B.L. Redmond and D.F. Karnosky. 1986. On the nature of intra- and interspecific incompatibility in Ulmus. Amer. J. Bot. 73:465–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolyard, M.G. and M.B. Sticklen. 1992. Strategies for the production of DED-resistant American elms. 1992 International Dutch Elm Disease Workshop (In Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolyard, M.G., C. Srinivasan and M.B. Sticklen. 1991a. Shoot regeneration system for DED-susceptible and putatively resistant American elms. J. Cell Biochem. Suppl. 15A:A202 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolyard, M.G., R.K. Hajela and M.B. Sticklen. 1991b. Microprojectile and Agrobacterium mediated transformation of Pioneer elm. J. Arboric. 17:34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broglie, K., I. Chet, M. Holliday, R. Cressman, P. Biddle, S. Knowlton, C.J. Mauvais and R. Broglie. 1991. Transgenic plants with enhanced resistance to the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia Solani. Science 254:1194–1197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bugos, R.C., V.L.C. Chiang and W.H. Campbell. 1991. cDNA cloning, sequence analysis and seasonal expression of lignin-bispecific caffeic acid/5-hydroxyferulic acid O-methyltransferase. Plant Mol. Biol. 17:1203–1215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalupa, V. 1975. Induction of organogenesis in forest tree cultures. Commun. Inst. For. Czech. 9:39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou, P. 1992. Genetic transformation of crop plants using microprojectile bombardment. Plant J. 2:275–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diner, A.M. and D.F. Karnosky. 1987. Tissue culture application to forest pathology and pest control. In: Bonga, J. and D. Durzan (Eds.) Tissue Culture in Forestry. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. pp. 351–373.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Domir, S.C., M.B. Sticklen, M. Bolyard and R.D. Lineberger. 1992. Micropropagation and regeneration of DED-resistant elms using protoplast and tissue culture techniques. 1992 International Dutch Elm Disease Workshop (In Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorion, N., P. Danthu, S. Ohki, C. Preneux, B. Godin and C. Bigot. 1991. Plant regeneration from leaf protoplasts of common elm (Ulmus compestris Mill.). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 313:467–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne, L.C., R.S. Jeng and M. Hubbes. 1985. Accumulation of phytoalexins in Ulmus americana in response to infection by a non-aggressive and an aggressive strain of Ophiostoma ulmi. Can. J. Bot. 63:678–680.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, M.T., G.M. Strunz, M. Hubbes and R.S. Jeng. 1986. Inhibition of Ceratocystis ulmi by mansonones A,C,D,E,F and G isolated from Ulmus americana. Eur. J. For. Path. 16:217–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durzan, D.J. and S.M. Lopushanski. 1975. Propagation of American elm via cell suspension culture. Can. J. For. Res. 5:273–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D.D., D. McCabe, D. Russell, B. Martinell and B.H. McCown. 1991. Expression of inducible angiosperm promoters in a gymnosperm, Picea glauca (white spruce). Plant Mol. Biol. 17:19–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fillatti, J.J., J. Sellmer, B. McCown, B. Haissig and L. Comai. 1987. Agrobacterium mediated transformation and regeneration of Populus. Mol. Gen. Genet. 206:192–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., A.M. Diner and D.F. Karnosky. 1991. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformation and regeneration of a conifer: Larix decidua In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. (Plant) 3:201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquiot, C. 1949. Observations sur la neoformation de bourgeons chez le tissu cambial d’Ulmus compestris cultivé in vitro. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 229:529–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D.J., A.J. Passey, D.J. Barbara and M. Bevan. 1989. Genetic transformation of apple (Malus pumila Mill) using a disarmed Ti-binary vector. Plant Cell Reprt. 7:658–661.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, R.A. 1989. The GUS reporter gene system. Nature 342:837–838.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karnosky, D.F. 1979. Dutch elm disease: A review of the history, environmental implications, control and research needs. Environ. Cons. 6:311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnosky, D.F. and R.A. Mickler. 1984. Propagation and preservation of elms via tissue culture systems. In: M.L. Duryea and G.N. Brown (Eds.) Seedling physiology and reforestation success. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 29–36.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karnosky, D.F. and R.A. Mickler, 1986. Elms (Ulmus spp.). In: Y.P.S. Bajaj (Ed.). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry I. Springer-Verlag. New York. Pp. 326–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnosky, D.F., R.A. Mickler and D.D. Lange. 1982. Hormonal control of shoot and root induction in hypocotyl callus cultures of American elm. In Vitro 18:275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R., A. Chan, M. Daly and J. McPherson. Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236: 1299–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mante, S., P.H. Morgens, R. Scorz, J.M. Cordts and A.M. Callahan. 1991. Agrobacterium mediated transformation of plum (Prunus domestica L.) hypocotyl slices and regeneration of transgenic plants. Bio/Technology 9:853–857.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, G.H., C.A. Leslie, S.L. Uratsu, L.A. Martin and A.M. Candekar. 1988. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of walnut somatic embryos and regeneration of transgenic plants. Bio/Technology 6:800–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, A.D., J.A. Wahleithaer, M. Lund, H.T. Bonnett, A. Kelly, D.R. Meeks-Wagner, W.J. Peacock and E.S. Dennis. Chitinase, 13–1,3 glucanase, osmotin and extensin are expressed in tobacco expiants during flower formation. Plant Cell 2:673–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peach, C. and J. Veiten. 1991. Transgene expression variability (position effect) of CAT and GUS reporter genes driven by linked divergent T-DNA promoters. Plant Mol. Biol. 17:49–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pijut, P.M., R.D. Lineberger, S.C. Domir and L.R. Schreiber. 1988. Response of elm callus to culture filtrate of Ceratocystis ulmi and correlation with whole-plant disease reaction. HortScience 23:787 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijut, P.M., S.C. Domir, R.D. Lineberger and L.R. Schrieber. 1990. Use of culture filtrates of Ceratocystis ulmi as a bioassay to screen for disease-tolerant Ulmus americana. Plant Sci. 70:fl91–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redenbaugh, M.K., D.F. Karnosky and R.D. Westfall. 1981. Protoplast isolation and fusion in three Ulmus species. Can. J. Bot. 59: 1436–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smigocki, A.C. and F.A. Hammerschlag. 1991. Regeneration of plants from peach embryo cells infected with a shooty mutant strain of Agrobacterium. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116: 1092–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sticklen, M.B., S.C. Domir and R.D. Lineberger. 1986. Shoot regeneration from protoplasts of Ulmus x ‘Pioneer’. Plant Science 47:29–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sticklen, M.B, M.G. Bolyard, R.K. Hajela and L.C. Duchesne. 1991. Molecular and cellular aspects of Dutch elm disease. Phytoprotectkm 72: 1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szczegola, M., R. Jeng and M. Hubbes. 1987. Mansonone induction by Ophiostoma ulmi in callus cultures of elm species. Can. J. Plant Path. 9:286 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbeck, P., W. Swain and N.S. Yang. 1989. Inheritance and expression of genes for kanamycin and chloromphenical resistance in transgenic cotton plants. Crop Science 29:196–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karnosky, D.F., Podila, G.K. (1993). Elm Improvement Via Biotechnological Methods. In: Sticklen, M.B., Sherald, J.L. (eds) Dutch Elm Disease Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6872-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6872-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-6874-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6872-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics