Skip to main content

Stochastic consumer behaviour models

  • Chapter
Building Implementable Marketing Models

Abstract

There is a fundamental difference between stochastic consumer behaviour models and most models described up to now in that,

‘a stochastic model is a model in which the probability components are built in at the outset rather than being added ex post facto to accomodate discrepancies between predicted and actual results’ (Massy, Montgomery and Morrison, 1970, p. 4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nicosia (1972) calls these models behaviouristic. The label ‘behavioural’ is reserved for models where other factors are explicitly considered.

    Google Scholar 

  2. tT means that t is an element (or member) of the set T, or, in other words, is a short hand notion for writing t belongs to T.

    Google Scholar 

  3. In other words, what is the total demand in a specified interval of time.

    Google Scholar 

  4. In this book, we do not consider the question which stochastic process describes the purchase data best. The interested reader is referred to Morrison (1966), Montgomery (1969), and Wierenga (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Although it is not our purpose to give a detailed study of brand choice models some introduction is inevitable. For an extensive review, see, for example, Massy, Montgomery, Morrison (1970) and Wierenga (1974). Introductory treatments are Montgomery and Urban (1969, pp. 53–93), Simon and Freimer (1970, Ch. 10). For a treatment of Markov models we refer to Leeflang (1974, Ch. 3, 7).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The latter name is used by Bass (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. For an example of estimation of transition probabilities from panel data, see Telser (1962a).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See also Telser (1962b, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See also Section 4.1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See also the application from Lambin (1970), discussed above.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also Jones (1973). In the same way a homogeneous Bernouilli model can be transformed into a heterogeneous Bernouilli model, as is shown by Massy, Montgomery and Morrison (1970, pp. 59–78).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See in this resepct Ehrenberg’s (1965) pessimistic view on the possibilities of Markov chain applications in brand choice processes.

    Google Scholar 

  13. No authors listed.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A fact confirmed in an empirical context by Colard (1975), whose basic assumption was a heterogeneous multinomial probability model.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Starr (1975, pp. 199–200). Herniter (1974) compared the Hendry Model with his own entropy model (Herniter, 1973). For an axiomatic definition and an extensive treatment of entropy in an economic context, see Theil (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brand 3 is only sold in cups.

    Google Scholar 

  17. We remind the reader that the illustration is hypothetical and that the conclusions may, therefore, perhaps be somewhat overstated.

    Google Scholar 

  18. We can leave out the brand index since in learning models one generally considers only two brands.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Kuehn (1962), and Herniter and Howard (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Again it is assumed that g = l.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See, for example, Carman (1966), McConnell (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See, for example, Kotier (1971, p. 474).

    Google Scholar 

  23. The variable v = the average amount purchased by all individuals is replaced in this model by λ k the average amount purchased by an individual k, k = 1,…, N.

    Google Scholar 

  24. troll is an interactive estimation and simulation package developed by the Computer Research Center, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. For a description of the estimation method, see Eisner and Pindyck (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. On poisson-type purchase models, see equations (10.31) to (10.33).

    Google Scholar 

  26. For a more thorough discussion about the way a normative model could be built using a consumer behaviour model and a response model, we refer to Leeflang (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lilien (1976) is another example of allocating a retail outlet building budget across market areas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 H. E. Stenfert Kroese B. V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naert, P.A., Leeflang, P.S.H. (1978). Stochastic consumer behaviour models. In: Building Implementable Marketing Models. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6586-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6586-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-207-0674-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6586-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics