Abstract
It is especially fitting on this occasion to begin by acknowledging how pleased I am to be a participant in this symposium. I suspect that I am not alone among the assembled in considering myself fortunate to be here. For I was conceived after antibiotics yet before amniocentesis, late enough to have benefited from medicine’s ability to prevent and control fatal infectious diseases, yet early enough to have escaped from medicine’s ability to prevent me from living to suffer from my genetic diseases. To be sure, my genetic vices are, as far as I know them, rather modest, taken individually—myopia, asthma and other allergies, bilateral forefoot adduction, bowleggedness, loquaciousness, and pessimism, plus some four to eight as yet undiagnosed recessive lethal genes in the heterozygous condition—but, taken together, and if diagnosable prenatally, I might never have made it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kass, L.R. (1979). Implications of Prenatal Diagnosis for the Human Right to Life. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Biomedical Ethics and the Law. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6561-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6561-1_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-6563-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6561-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive