Skip to main content

External Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

  • Chapter
Atlas of the Prostate

Abstract

Controversies in the management of prostate cancer make treatment selection one of the most challenging areas in contemporary oncology. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the one treatment modality that has applications at every stage in the natural history of carcinoma of the prostate. In early disease, it is a curative therapy that can eradicate organ-confined tumor with maximal preservation of adjacent normal tissues. Its efficacy is similar to that of surgery and its side effect profile is favorable. In the past few years, we have seen major advances in the technique of dose delivery. Three-dimensional conformal planning has become widespread and has been proven to allow safe escalation of the radiation dose and to increase disease control [1–5]. Intensity modulated radiotherapy, an advanced form of three-dimensional planning currently under study, holds promise to further improve dose distribution. Another area of intense investigation has been the use of interstitial radioactive implants, alone or in combination with EBRT. In locally advanced prostate cancer (tumor with extension beyond the confines of the glandular capsule, into the seminal vesicles, or into regional structures), EBRT combined with androgen deprivation has become the standard of care [6–9]. For those patients who have undergone surgical resection as the primary form of management, retrospective studies have identified a role for adjuvant EBRT; it provides improved local control for tumors with poor pathologic features (eg positive margins, high grade, advanced pathologic tumor stage) [10–17]. Randomized studies looking at the impact of this treatment on overall survival have now been completed; the results are awaited. EBRT also has a role in salvage therapy for patients with late local recurrences following surgery, whether detected on biochemical studies or by physical examination [14,18–21]. Finally, EBRT has a well-established role in the management of symptomatic osseous metastases, and it generally provides quick and effective pain control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al.: Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Intl Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998, 41: 491–500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Pinover WH, et al.: Survival advantage for prostate cancer patients treated with high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Cancer J Sci Am 1999, 5: 152–158.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pollack A, Smith LG, von Eschenbach AC: External beam radiotherapy dose response characteristics of 1127 men with prostate cancer treated in the PSA era. lot J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 48: 507–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kupelian PA, Mohan DS, Lyons J, et al.: Higher than standard radiation doses (≥72 Gy) with or without androgen deprivation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Intl Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 46: 567–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Smith LG, et al.: Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. J. Clin Oncol 2000, 18: 3904–3911.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pilepich MV, Winter K, John MJ, etal.: Phase III radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) trial 86–10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Intl Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 50: 1243–1252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawton CA, Winter K, Murray K, et al.: Updated results of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85–31 evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 49: 937–946.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zagars KG, Johnson DE, Von Eschenbach AC, Hussey DH: Adjuvant estrogen following radiation therapy for stage C adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results of a prospective randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988, 14: 1085–1091.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolla M, Gonzalez D, Warde P, et al.: Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin. N Engl J Med 1997, 37: 295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Petrovich Z, Lieskovsky G, Langholz B, et al.: Nonrandomized comparison of surgery with and without adjuvant pelvic irradiation for patients with pT3NO adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Am J Clin Oncol 2001, 24: 537–546.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Syndikus I, Pickles T, Kostashuk E, Sullivan LD: Postoperative radiotherapy for stage pT3 carcinoma of the prostate: improved local control. J Urol 1996, 155: 1983–1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anscher MS, Robertson CN, Prosnitz R: Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologic stage T3/4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate: ten-year update. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995, 33: 37–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schild SE, Wong WW, Grado GL, et al.: The result of radical retropubic prostatectomy and adjuvant therapy for pathologic stage C prostate cancer. lnt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996, 34: 535–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Catton C, Gospodarowicz M, Warde P, et al.: Adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Radiother Oncol 2001, 59: 51–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vicini FA, Ziaja EL, Kestin LL, et al.: Treatment outcome with adjuvant and salvage irradiation after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology 1999, 54: 111–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morris MM, Dallow KC, Zietman AL, et al.: Adjuvant and salvage irradiation following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 38: 731–736.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Valicenti RK, Gomella LG, Ismail M, et al.: Durable efficacy of early postoperative radiation therapy for high-risk pT3NO prostate cancer: the importance of radiation dose. Urology 1998, 52: 1034–1040.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pisansky TM, Kozelsky TF, Myers RP, et al.: Radiotherapy for isolated serum prostate specific antigen elevation after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2000, 163: 845–850.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anscher MS, Clough R, Dodge R: Radiotherapy for a rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: the first 10 years. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 48: 369–375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cadeddu JA, Partin AW, De Weese TL, Walsh PC: Long-term results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1998, 159: 173–177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nudell DM, Grossfeld GD, Weinberg VK, et al.: Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: treatment outcomes and failure patterns. Urology 1999, 54: 1049–1057.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McGwan DG: The value of extended field radiation therapy in carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1981, 7: 1333–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Asbell SO, Kroll JM, Pilepich MV, et al.: Elective pelvic irradiation in stage A2, B carcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG 77–06. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988, 15: 1307–1316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Partin AW, Yoo J, Carter WH, et al.: The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1993, 150: 110–114.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pisansky TM, Zincke H, Sumer VJ, et al.: Correlation of pretherapy prostate cancer characteristics with histologic findings from pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996, 34: 33–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bagshaw MA, Kaplan ID, Cox RC: Prostate cancer: radiation therapy for localized disease. Cancer 1993, 71 (3 suppl): 939–952.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hanks GE: Treatment for early stage prostate cancer: radiotherapy. In Important Advances in Oncology. Edited by Hellman S, DeVita V, Rosenberg S, et al. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Perez CA, Lee H, Georgiou A, et al.: Technical and tumor-related factors affecting outcomes of definitive irradiation for localized carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993, 26: 565–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. The American Urologial Association: The American Urological Association Prostate Cancer Clinical Guidelines Panel Report on the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Baltimore: American Urological Association; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bagshaw MA, Cow RS, Ray GR: Status of radiation therapy of prostate cancer at Stanford University. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1988, 7: 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lawton CA, Won M, Pilepich MV, et al.: Long-term treatment sequelae following external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG studies 7506 and 7706. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991, 21: 935–939.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Perez CA, Pilepich MV, Garcia D, et al.: Definitive radiation therapy in carcinoma of the prostate localized to the pelvis: experience at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology. NCI Monogr 1988, 7: 85–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Forman JD, Zinreich E, Lee D, et al.: Improving the therapeutic ratio of external beam irradiation for carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985, 11: 2073–2080.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Michalski JM, Purdy JA, Winter K, et al.: Preliminary report of toxicity following 3D radiation therapy for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 46: 391–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dearnaley DP, Khoo VS, Norman AR, et al.: Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999, 353: 267–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanks GE, Leibel SA, Krall JM, Kramer S: Patterns of care studies: dose-response observations for local control of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985, 11: 153–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Leibel SA, Zelefsky MJ, Kutcher GJ, et al.: Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in localized carcinoma of the prostate: interim report of a phase 1 dose-escalation study. J Urol 1994, 152: 1792–1798.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schultheiss TE, Lee R, Hunt M, et al.: Late GI and GU complications in the treatment of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 37: 3–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Forman JD, Duclos M, Shamsa F, et al.: Hyperfractionated conformal radiotherapy in locally advanced prostate cancer: results of a dose escalation study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996, 34: 655–662.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vicini FA, Abner A, Baglan KL, et al.: Defining a dose-response relationship with radiotherapy for prostate cancer: is more really better? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 51: 1200–1208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Russell KJ, Caplan RJ, Laramore GE, et al.: Photon versus fast neutron external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: results of a randomized prospective trial. Int JRadiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994, 28: 47–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Laramore GE, Krall JM, Thomas FJ, et al.: Fast neutron radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: final report of a RTOG randomized clinical trial. Am Clin Oncol 1993, 16: 164–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Forman JD, Duclos M, Sharma R, et al.: Conformal mixed neutron and photon irradiation in localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: preliminary estimates of the therapeutic ratio. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996, 35: 259–266.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Barocas DA, Han M, Epstein JI, et al.: Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer? Urology 2001, 58: 746–751.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Leibovich BC, Engen DE, Patterson DE, et al.: Benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with a positive surgical margin. J Urol 2000, 163: 1178–1182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Corn BW,Winter K, Pilepich MV: Does androgen suppression enhance the efficacy of postoperative irradiation? A secondary analysis of RTOG 85–31. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Urology 1999, 54: 495–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Current Medicine, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ben-Josef, E., Porter, A.T. (2003). External Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. In: Bruskewitz, R.C. (eds) Atlas of the Prostate. Current Medicine Group, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6505-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6505-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Current Medicine Group, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-6507-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6505-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics