Abstract
It is suggested that all sciences pass through periods of demarcation difficulties, wherein science and superstition, fact and fiction, testable theory and arbitrary speculation confront each other. This ordeal by quackery finally resulted in the divorce of astronomy from astrology, of chemistry from alchemy, and of physics from metaphysics. Psychology is still in a stage during which such a demarcation is difficult to make and experimental psychology, psychometrics, behavioral genetics, learning theory, and other attempts to make psychology into a true science are confronted by pseudosciences like psychoanalysis, hermeneutics, existentialism, and other similar movements that are essentially hostile to the scientific study of human behavior. Even within the scientific group there are fissiparous tendencies preventing the achievement of a unified science; these are discussed in some detail, and suggestions are made as to how they could be overcome. It is concluded that a unified, paradigmatic science of psychology is possible only by the exclusion of nonscientific groups, beliefs and concepts and by greater tolerance within the scientific group of different approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achinstein, P. (1983). The nature of explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1984). What is a law of nature London: Cambridge University Press.
Ayer, A. J. (1959). Logical positivism. New York: Free Press.
Barnes, B. (1982). T. S. Kuhn and social science. London: Macmillan.
Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966). Social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
Bernal, J. D. (1954). Science in history ( 4 Vols.) London: C. A. Watts.
Buss, A. R. (1975). The emerging field of the sociology of psychological knowledge. American Psychologist, 30, 988–1002.
Cattell, R. B. (1980). Personality and learning theory ( 2 Vols.) New York: Springer.
Conant, J. B. (Ed.). (1964). The overthrow of the phlogiston theory: The chemical revolution (pp. 1775–1789 ). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
Di Loreto, A. (1976). Comparative psychotherapy. New York: Aldine.
Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Eysenck, H. J. (1976a). Ideology run wild. American Psychologist, 31, 311–312.
Eysenck, H. J. (1976b). The measurement of personality. Lancaster, England: Medical & Technical Publishers.
Eysenck, H. J. (1978). The development of personality and its relation to learning. In S. Murray-Smith (Ed.), Melbourne studies in education (pp. 134–181 ). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1979). The structure and measurement of intelligence. New York: Springer.
Eysenck, H. J. (1980a). The biosocial model of man and the unification of psychology. In A. J. Chapman & D. M. Jones (Eds.), Models of man (pp. 49–62 ). Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
Eysenck, H. J. (1980b). Man as a biosocial animal: Comments on the sociobiology debate. Political Psychology, 2, 43–51.
Eysenck, H. J. (1980c). The biosocial nature of man. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 3, 125–134.
Eysenck, H. J. (1981). A model of personality. New York: Springer.
Eysenck, H. J. (1982a). The sociology of psychological knowledge, the genetic interpretation of the IQ, and Marxist-Leninist ideology. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 35, 449–451.
Eysenck, H. J. (1982b). A model for intelligence. New York: Springer.
Eysenck, H. J. (1983a). Is there a paradigm in personality research? Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 369–397.
Eysenck, H. J. (1983b). Special review: M. L. Smith, G. V. Glass, and T. I. Miller-The benefits of psychotherapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21, 315–320.
Eysenck, H. J. (1984). The place of individual differences in a scientific psychology. In J. R. Royce & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233–235, 305314 ). New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1985a). The decline and fall of the Freudian empire. London: Viking Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1985b). The place of theory in a world of facts. In K. B. Madsen & L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 17–72, 103–114 ). New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1987). Psychotherapy to behaviour therapy: A paradigm shift. In D. B. Fishman, F. Rotgers, & C. M. Franks (Eds.), Paradigms in behaviour therapy: Present and promise. New York: Springer.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1969). Personality structure and measurement. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (1973). The experimental study of Freudian theories. London: Methuen.
Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A., Ostrowska, A., Sokolowska, M., Stein, A., Susser, M., & Wald, I. (1978). Cognitive development and social policy. Science, 200, 1357–1362.
Firkowska-Mankiewicz,. A., & Czarkowski, M. P. (1982). Social status and mental test performance in Warsaw children. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 237–247.
Fitch, W. M., & Margoliash, E. (1967). Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science, 155, 279–284.
Fuchs, A. H., & Kawash, G. (1974). Prescriptive dimensions for five schools of psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 10, 352–366.
Furedy, J. J., & Furedy, L. (1982). Socratic versus sophistic strains in the teaching of undergraduate psychology: Implicit conflicts and explicit. Teaching of Psychology, 9, 1420.
Grünbaum, S. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Guthke, J. (1978). Ist Intelligenz messbar Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Theories and personality (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.
Hitt, W. D. (1969). Two models of man. American Psychologist, 24, 651–659.
Hjelle, L. A., & Ziegler, D. J. (1981). Personality theories ( 2nd ed. ). New York: McGraw-Hill.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longmans.
Jardine, N. (1984). The birth of history and philosophy of science. London: Cambridge University Press.
Joffe, J. M. (1965). The effects of pre-natal maternal stress on emotionality and learning ability in rats selected for emotional reactivity. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
Jones, M. B., & Fennell, R. S. (1965). Runway performance by two strains of rats. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences, 28, 289–296.
Kamin, L. J. (1974). The science and politics of IQ. London: Wiley.
Kawash, G., & Fuchs, A. F. (1974). A factor analysis of ratings of five schools of psychology on prescriptive dimensions. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 10, 426–437.
Kendler, H. H. (1981). Psychology: A science in conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kimble, G. A. (1984). Psychology’s two cultures. American Psychologist, 39, 833–839.
Kline, P. (1981). Fact and fantasy in Freudian theory. London: Methuen.
Koch, S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge. American Psychologist, 36, 257–269.
Krasner, L., & Houts, A. C. (1984). A study of the “value” systems of the behavioural scientist. American Psychologist, 39, 840–850.
Krutezki, W. A. (1974). Die Entwicklund Leninscher Ideen in der sowjetischen Psychologie der Fähigkeiten. In W. A. Krutexki (Ed.), Lenins philosophisches Erbe und Ergebnisse der sowjetischen Psychologie (pp. 136–149 ). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Kuhn, T. S. (1959). The Copernican revolution. New York: Vintage Books.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459–482 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. London: Cambridge University Press.
Leith, G. O. (1974). Individual differences in learning interactions of personality and teaching methods. In Proceedings of Conference on Personality and Academic Progress (pp. 14–25 ). London, England: Association of Educational Psychologists.
Lenin, W. I. (1965). Ein liberater Professor über die Gleichheit. In W. I. Lenin (Ed.), Werke (Band 20 ). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Lipovechaja, N. G., Kantonistova, N. C., & Chamaganova. T. G. (1978). The role of heredity and environment in the determination of intellectual functions. Medicinskie Problemy Formirovanija Livcnosti, 17, 48–59.
McClearn, G. E. (1962). Genetic differences in the effect of alcohol upon behaviour of mice. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Alcohol and Road Traffic. London: H.M.S.O.
MacKinnon, E. M. (1982). Scientific explanation and atomic physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mangan, G. (1982). The biology of human conduct. London: Pergamon.
Mehlhorn, G., & Mehlhorn, H. (1981). Intelligenz. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1981). The rationality of science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pastore, N. (1949). The nature-nurture controversy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Popper, K. (1935). Logik der Forschung. Wien: J. Springer.
Popper, K. (1965). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Basic Books.
Prentsky, R. A. (1979). The biological aspects of normal personality. Baltimore: Medical & Technical Publishers.
Prioleau, L., Murdock, M., & Brody, N. (1983). An analysis of psychotherapy vs. placebo studies. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 275–285.
Rachman, S. J., & Wilson, G. T. (1980). The effects of psychological therapy. London: Pergamon.
Shigehisa, T., & Symons, J. R. (1973). Effect of intensity of visual stimulation on auditory sensitivity in relation to personality. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 205–213.
Simonton, D. K. (1976). Do Sorokin s data support his theory? A study of generational predications in philosophical beliefs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 187198.
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity and leadership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Snow, C. P. (1964). The two cultures and a second look. London: Cambridge University Press.
Sokal, R. R., & Sneath, P. H. S. (1963). Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Sorokin, P. A. (1941). Social and cultural dynamics. New York: American Books.
Staats, A. W. (1981). Paradigmatic behaviourism, unified theory, unified theory construction methods, and the zeitgeist of separation. American Psychologist, 36, 239–256.
Stark, W. (1958). The sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Strelau, J. (1983). Temperament, personality, activity. London: Academic Press.
Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1974). The structure of scientific theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thouless, R. H. (1935). The tendency to certainty in religious beliefs. British Journal of Psychology, 26, 16–31.
Toulmin, S. (1953). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.
Tweney, R. D., Doherty, M. E., & Mynatt, C. R. (Eds.). (1981). On scientific thinking. New York: Columbia University Press.
Urbantschitsch, V. (1883). Uber den Einfluss von Trigeminus-Reizen auf die Sinnesempfindungen insbesondere auf den Gisichtssinn. Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie, 30, 129–175.
Watson, R. I. (1967). Psychology: A prescriptive science. American Psychologist, 22, 435–443.
Weiss, V. (1982). Psychogenetik: Humangenetik in Psychologie und Psychiatrie. Jena: V. E. B. Gustav Fisher Verlag.
Weiss, V., & Mehlhorn, M. G. (1980). Der Hauptgenlocus der allgemeinen Intelligenz. Biologisches Zentralbatt, 99, 297–310.
Wertheimer, M. (1972). Fundamental issues in psychology. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eysenck, H.J. (1987). The Growth of a Unified Scientific Psychology. In: Staats, A.W., Mos, L.P. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6456-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6456-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-6458-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6456-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive