Advertisement

The Universal Service Obligation for Post: Some Australian Calculations

Chapter
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series book series (TREP, volume 25)

Abstract

Like most providers of national postal services Australia Post (AP) is obliged to provide a universal letter service which includes a standard domestic letter service at a uniform price. Despite this requirement, AP is also expected to operate on a commercial basis. Since 1989 management has been given considerable discretion but has also been required to pay all relevant taxes and to return dividend payments in accordance with its financial plan.

Keywords

Path Cost Public Enterprise Uniform Price Australian Government Publishing Service Obligation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australia, Steering Committee on National Performance Monitoring of Government Trading Enterprises. 1994. Community service obligations: some definitional, costing and funding issues Melbourne: Industry Commission.Google Scholar
  2. Australia, Minister for Transport and Communications. 1988. Reshaping the transport and communications government business enterprises Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  3. Australia, Industries Assistance Commission. 1989a. “Inquiry into government (non-tax) charges.” Industries Assistance Commission Information Paper Number 8. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  4. Australia, Bureau of Transport and Communications Economics. 1989b. The cost of Telecom’s Community Services Obligations Report 64. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  5. Australia, Commonwealth Treasury. 1990. “Social responsibilities and performance meas-urement for government business enterprises” Economic Round-Up (May):19–36.Google Scholar
  6. Australia, S. 1995. Competition Policy Reform Bill: Second Reading Speech Can-berra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  7. A Post. 1992. Corporate Plan 1992/95 to 1994/95 Triennium: Volume 2—Addendum: community service obligations Melbourne: Australia Post.Google Scholar
  8. Braeutigam, R. 1980. “An analysis of fully distributed cost pricing in regulated industries” Bell Journal of Economics 11(1):182–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, S., and D. Sibley. 1986. The theory of public utility pricing Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. De Ridder, J. 1989. “Community service obligation—the public service challenge.” Telecom Economic Paper, No.5. Melbourne: Telstra Australia Corporation.Google Scholar
  11. Dobbs, I., and J. Golay. 1995. “Costing the universal service obligation: the profitability, distributional and welfare consequences of retaining uniform prices.” Paper presented at the Cost of Universal Service, 3rd Konigswinter Seminar, Germany.Google Scholar
  12. Elsenbast, W., F. Pieper and U. Stumpf. 1995. “Estimating the universal service burden of public postal operators.” Wissenschaftliches Institut fur Kommunikationsdienste, Diskussionsbeitrag (Nr 150. Bad Honnef, Germany: Wissenschaftliches Institut fur Kommunikationsdienste.Google Scholar
  13. Faulhaber, G. 1975. “Cross-subsidisation: pricing in public enterprises.” American Economic Review 65:966–77.Google Scholar
  14. Kowalewski, K., and K. Muller. 1995. “Cost of the universal service obligation—the German perspective”. Deutsche Post, mimeo.Google Scholar
  15. Laffont, J-J and J. Tirole. 1993. A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Maddock, R. 1995. “Transactions costs and public enterprise reform: the case of post.” Paperpresented to the Bureau of Industry Economics Conference, Melbourne, July 1995.Google Scholar
  17. Sidak, G., and D. Spulber. 1996. Protecting competition from the postal monopoly Wash-ington, D.C.:American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
  18. Spulber, D. 1989. Regulation and markets Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations