Skip to main content
  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

This study has focused on two things: On the basis of some new information it has compared the workweek of fixed capital in the mid-70s with the workweek in 1929, and it has made a start in analyzing why the change has occurred. The economic significance of a longterm rise in average weekly hours worked by capital has already been discussed, but other implications are worth noting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abramovitz, Moses. Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870. National Bureau of Economic Research, Occasional Paper 42. New York, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Economic Growth in the United States.” American Economic Review 52:762–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitz, Moses, and David, Paul A. “Reinterpreting Economic Growth: Parables and Realities.” Papers and Proceedings of the American Economic Association, May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Engineering Council. The Twelve-Hour Shift in Industry. New York: E. P. Dutton,1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt, Roger R., and Clague, Christopher K. “An Economic Analysis of Capital Utilization.” Southern Economic Journal 42:69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • “An Econometric Analysis of Capital Utilization.” International Economic Review 19, no. 1 (February 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Multiple Shifts and the Employment Problem in Less-Developed Countries.” International Lahor Review 114:187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Working Capital and Shift-Work in Imperfect Capital Markets.” Unpublished, April 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartter, Allan. Proceedings of Ninth Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association (1956): 224–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Laurits R., and Jorgenson, Dale W. “The Measurement of U.S. Real Capital Input.” Review of Income and Wealth, series 15 (1969): 293–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “U.S. Real Product and Real Factor Input, 1929–1967.” Review of Income and Wealth, series 16 (1970): 19–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Measuring the Performance of the Private Sector of the U.S. Economy, 1929–1969.” In Measuring Economic and Social Performance, edited by Milton Moss. New York: Columbia University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clague, Christopher K. “The Theory of Capital Utilization: Some Extensions.” Unpublished, April 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen, Robert M. “The Effect of Cash Flow on the Speed of Adjustment.” In Tax Incentives and Capital Spending, edited by G. Fromm. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creamer, Daniel; Dobrovolsky, Sergei; and Borenstein, Israel. Capital in Manufacturing and Mining: Its Formation and Financing. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dankert, Clyde E. “Shorter Hours and Multiple Shifts: A Future Pattern?” Personnel 36: 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dankert, Clyde E.; Mann, Floyd C; and Northrup, Herbert R., eds. Hours of Work New York: Harper and Row, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, Edward F. The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives before Us. Committee for Economic Development, Supplementary Paper No. 13. New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Why Growth Rates Differ. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Accounting for United States Economic Growth 1929–1969. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Some Major Issues in Productivity Analysis: An Examination of Estimates by Jorgenson and Griliches” and “Final Comments.” Survey of Current Business 52 (May 1972), part II.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Accounting for Slower Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabricant, Solomon. Basic Facts on Productivity Change. National Bureau of Economic Research, Occasional Paper 63. New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellner, William. Trends and Cycles in Economic Activity. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, Murray F. “The Utilization of Capital Equipment.” Survey of Current Business 43:8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard, and Medoff, James. “New Estimates of Private Sector Unionism in the United States.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 32, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. “The Economics of Production.” American Economic Review 60:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, Raymond W. The National Wealth of the United States in the Postwar Period Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollop, Frank M., and Jorgenson, Dale W. “U.S. Productivity Growth by Industry, 1947–73.” In New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis, John W. Kendrick and Beatrice N. Vaccara, eds. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grose, Lawrence; Rottenberg, Irving; and Wasson, Robert. “New Estimates of Fixed Business Capital in the United States, 1925–65.” Survey of Current Business 46, no. 12 (December 1966): 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathfield, David F. “The Measurement of Capital Usage Using Electricity Consumption Data for the U.K.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A,135, Part 2:208–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, Janice N., and Sekscenski, Edward S. “Workers on Late Shifts in a Changing Economy.” Monthly Labor Review 102:14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, Bert G. Investment Demand and U.S. Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaszi, George; Wasson, Robert G; and Grose, Lawrence. “Expansion of Fixed Business Capital in the United States.” Survey of Current Business 42, no. 11 (November 1962): 9–18,28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W., and Griliches, Z. “The Explanation of Productivity Change.” Review of Economic Studies 34:249–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Issues in Growth Accounting: A Reply to Edward F. Denison” and “Final Reply.” Survey of Current Business 52 (May 1972), part II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, John W. Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Postwar Productivity Trends in the United States, 1948–1969. New York: Columbia University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. The Formation and Stocks of Total Capital. New York: Columbia University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, John W., and Grossman, Elliott S. Productivity in the United States. Trends and Cycles. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Young D., and Winston, Gordon C. “The Optimum Utilization of Capital Stock and the Level of Economic Development,” Economica 41:337–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, Simon. Capital in the American Economy: Its Formation and Financing. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, Simon, ed. Income and Wealth of the United States. Cambridge: Bowes and Bowes, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcomson, James M. “Capacity Utilization, the User Cost of Capital and the Cost of Adjustment.” International Economic Review 16:352–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, Robin. The Economics of Capital Utilization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurice, Marc. Shiftwork. Geneva: International Labor Office, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, John F. “Some Effects of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act upon Southern Industry.” Southern Economic Journal 9:15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Fredrick, W, and Nix, James C. “Premium Pay: An Analysis of Industrial Practices.” Monthly Labor Review, August 1951:148–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, John. “Fixed Nonresidential Business and Residential Capital in the United States, 1925–75.” Survey of Current Business 56, no. 4:46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq. “Some Approaches to the Theory and Measurement of Total Factor Productivity: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 8:1137–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrup, Herbert R., and Brinberg, Herbert R. Economics of the Work Week. National Industrial Conference Board, Studies in Business Economics, no. 24. New York, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nourse, Edwin G, and Associates. America’s Capacity to Produce. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, Charles M. “Late-Shift Employment in Manufacturing Industries.” Monthly Labor Review 93, no. 11:37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, Albert. The Economics of Work and Pay. 2d ed. New York: Harper and Row, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. New Measures of Wage-Earner Compensation in Manufacturing, 1914–57. National Bureau of Economic Research, Occasional Paper 75. New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, Charles L. “Some Effects of Changes in Working Hours on Investment, Output, and Real Wages.” Paper given at Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association Convention, September 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. “A Note on Profit Maximization and Its Implications.” Review of Economic Studies 11 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, P.J. “Economic Aspects of Shift and Night Work in Industrial Market Economies.” International Labor Review 117, no. 2 (March/April 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, Robert M. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1957:312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubman, Paul, and Gottschalk, Peter. “The Average Workweek of Capital in Manufacturing.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 66:448–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubman, Paul; Gottschalk, Peter; and Wilkinson, Maurice. “User Cost, Capital Utilization andlnvestment Theory.” International Economic Review 11:209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terleckyj, Nestor. “Factors Underlying Productivity: Some Empirical Observation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 53 (fune 1958): 593.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Sources of Productivity Change: A Pilot Study Based on the Experience of American Manufacturing Industries, 1948–1953.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ture, Norman B. Accelerated Depreciation in the United States, 1954–60. New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. Census of Manufactures, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Census of Manufactures, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Annual Survey of Manufactures, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Survey of Plant Capacity, MQ-C 1,1973,1974,1975,1976,1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Fixed Nonresidential Business and Residential Capital in the United States, 1973–75.” Survey of Current Business 56, no. 8:64.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Area Wage Statistics: Metropolitan Areas, United States and Regional Summaries. Bulletin 1900–82 (August 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • —. State Labor Laws for Women. Bulletin of the Women’s Bureau, no. 156, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “6.9 Million Workers on Late Shifts.” USDL Press Release 78–188, March 16, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Gordon C. “Capital Utilization in Economic Development.” Economic Journal 81:36–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Capital Utilization and Optimal Shift Work.” Bangladesh Economic Review 11:515–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “The Theory of Capital Utilization and Idleness.” Journal of Economic Literature 12:1301–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Gordon C, and McCoy, Thomas O. “Investment and the Optimal Idleness of Capital.” Review of Economic Studies 41:419–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalusky, John. “Shift Work-A Complex of Problems.” The AFL-CIO Federationist 85:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foss, M.F. (1997). Concluding Remarks. In: Shiftwork, Capital Hours and Productivity Change. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6201-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6201-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7843-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6201-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics