Skip to main content

Beyond Min Aggregation in Multicriteria Decision: (Ordered) Weighted Min, Discri-Min, Leximin

  • Chapter
The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators

Abstract

Conjunctive aggregation based on min operation provides too crude a ranking of the possible alternatives in multiple criteria aggregation, since decisions are only compared on the basis of the worst-rated criteria, and also since the levels of importance of the different criteria or constraints are not taken into account. Various types of weighted min operations are distinguished. Two refinements of the minbased ordering (and of the Pareto ordering which corresponds to a fuzzy set inclusion) are presented and relations between them are laid bare. These refinements aim to increase the discriminating power of the min-based aggregation, yet keeping its noncompensatory nature. A relationship between the leximin ordering and ordered weighted averages (OWA) is also discussed. Lastly, ordered weighted min operations are introduced and are shown to be of interest when only most of the criteria have to be taken into account in the evaluation.

This chapter is a revised and restructured version of a paper entitled “Ordered weighted operations,“discri-min” and leximin in multicriteria decision”, presented at the 2nd World Automation Congress (WAC′96) in the framework of the 1st International Symposium on Soft Computing for Industry (ISSCI–96) on May 27–30, 1996 in Montpellier (France).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Behringer, F. (1977) “On optimal decisions under complete ignorance: A new criterion stronger than both Pareto and maxmin.” Europ. J. of Operations Research, 1:295–306.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R., Zadeh, L.A. (1970) “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment.” Management Sciences, 17:141–164.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • De Baets, B. (1994) “Ordering alternatives in MCDM problems.” In Fuzzy logic and Intelligent Technologies in Nuclear Science, Da Ruan et al., eds., Singapore: World Scientific, 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Prade, H. (1994) “Propagation and Satisfaction of flexible constraints.” In Fuzzy Sets, Neural Networks and Soft Computing, R.R. Yager, L.A. Zadeh, eds., New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 166–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Prade, H. (1995) “Fuzzy constraints in job-shop scheduling.” J. of Intelligent Manufacturing, 6(4):215–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Prade, H. (1996) “Refinements of the maximin approach to decision-making in fuzzy environment.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 81:103–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Fortemps, P. (1996) “Computing improved optimal solutions to maxmin flexible constraint satisfaction problems.” Joint Report in preparation, IRIT, Toulouse and IMAGE, Faculte Polytechnique de Mons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H. (1992) “Inconsistency in possibilistic knowledge bases: To live with it or not live with it.” In Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty, L.A. Zadeh, J. Kacprzyk, eds., New York: Wiley, 335–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1980) Fuzzy Sets and Systems-Theory and Applications. New York: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1985) “Fuzzy cardinality and the modeling of imprecise quantification.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 16:199–230.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1986) “Weighted minimum and maximum operations in fuzzy set theory.” Information Sciences, 39:205–210.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Prade, H., Testemale, C. (1988) “Weighted fuzzy pattern matching.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 28:313–331.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fargier, H., Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1995) “Problèmes de satisfaction de contraintes flexibles: Une approche égalitariste.“ Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, 9(3):311–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fargier, H., Lang, J., Schiex, T. (1993) “Selecting preferred solutions in fuzzy constraint satisfaction problems.” In Proc. of the 1st Europ. Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies (EUFIT’93), ELITE, Aachen, Germany, 1128–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, R. (1992) “Towards a goal-oriented application of aggregation operators in fuzzy decision making.” In Proc. of the Inter. Conf. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU’92), Mallorca, Spain, July 6-10, 585–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch, M. (1995) “Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69(3):279–298.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1988) Axioms of Cooperative Decision-Making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro B.A.N., Muntz, R. (1996) “Fuzzy ranking of approximate answers.” In Proc. of the 1996 Workshop on Flexible Query-Answering Systems (FQAS’96), H. Christiansen, H.L. Larsen, T. Andreasen, eds., Roskilde, Denmark, May 22–24, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. (1962) “Tschebyscheff approximation in a compact metric space.” Bull. American Math. Soc, 68:405–410.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Trillas, E., Valverde, L. (1985) “On implication and indistinguishability in the setting of fuzzy logic.” Reprinted in Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems, D. Dubois, H. Prade, R.R. Yager, eds., San Francisco, CA: Morgan & Kaufmann, 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R. (1984) “General multiple objective decision making and linguistically quantified statements.” Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies, 21:389–400.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R. (1988) “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making.” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18:183–190.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R. (1996) “On the analytic representation of the leximin ordering and its application to flexible constraint propagation.” Tech. Report #MII-1602, Machine Intelligence Institute, Iona College, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Prade, H. (1997). Beyond Min Aggregation in Multicriteria Decision: (Ordered) Weighted Min, Discri-Min, Leximin. In: Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6123-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6123-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7806-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6123-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics